Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:39 PM Mar 2016

WaPo's take on upcoming delegate math

Bernie Sanders’s insurmountable delegate problem, in one simple graph

There's actually more than one graph, but ...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/31/bernie-sanderss-insurmountable-delegate-problem-in-one-simple-graph/

Whether or not New Yorkers view as one of their own, they clearly prefer Clinton as the Democratic presidential nominee. Polling has repeatedly shown Clinton with a lead in the state; a new survey from Quinnipiac University, released on Thursday, has Clinton up by 12 percentage points.

This comes on the heels of a survey showing Sanders stretching out his lead in Wisconsin. Sanders is up four points in that state, according to a Marquette Law School survey released this week.

But we must be clear: These states are not equivalent. This is not a tie, with Clinton winning one state and Sanders winning another. It is, instead, a clear demonstration of why Bernie Sanders almost certainly won't be the Democratic nominee.

After all, it comes down to delegates. Wisconsin has 86 delegates; New York has 247. Since the party distributes its delegates proportionally, that means that Sanders's slight Wisconsin lead would earn him a slightly bigger portion of the state's small delegate haul. Clinton's larger New York lead would earn her a larger portion of the state's large delegate haul.


But we should take no vote anywhere for granted.



2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo's take on upcoming delegate math (Original Post) BlueMTexpat Mar 2016 OP
That's the point - winning states doesn't necessarily mean winning delegates. George II Mar 2016 #1
You think the Bernie folks want super delegates now, just wait until the upaloopa Mar 2016 #2

George II

(67,782 posts)
1. That's the point - winning states doesn't necessarily mean winning delegates.
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:46 PM
Mar 2016

Even if it was, Sanders would be woefully behind - Clinton has won 18, Sanders 14. And Sanders has won states in the lower range of delegates, Clinton in the higher range. That's why she has a ~230 delegate lead.

The way the two states shape up, Sanders will win roughly 44 delegates in Wisconsin, Clinton 42 and Sanders will win 98 delegates in New York, Clinton 149.

So, they're "tied" for wins in the next two primaries, but Clinton has 191 delegates, Sanders 142. Sanders' "tie" will leave him 49 delegates further behind.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
2. You think the Bernie folks want super delegates now, just wait until the
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 02:58 PM
Mar 2016

pledge delegate math makes it impossible for him to win

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»WaPo's take on upcoming d...