Latin America
Related: About this forumVenezuela in Crisis: Too Much US intervention, Too Little Socialism
Venezuela in Crisis: Too Much US intervention, Too Little Socialism
July 14, 2016
by W. T. Whitney
Lisa Sullivan was worried: her neighbor was up and waiting in line since 2 am, searching, unsuccessfully, to buy food for her large family. The U. S. native living in Venezuela for decades is concerned too about Venezuelas worsening economic and political crisis.
Most Venezuelans have experienced major social gains courtesy of the Bolivarian Revolution, which according to its leader Hugo Chávez, president from 1999 until 2013, was a socialist revolution. Oil exports fueled these gains and currently low oil prices are shaking the foundations of Venezuelas social democracy.
Now as before U. S. intervention is on full display. The U. S. Senate in April passed a bill renewing economic sanctions against Venezuelan leaders originally imposed in 2014. The House of Representatives followed suit on July 6. President Obama will be signing the bill. In an executive order he declared Venezuela to be a threat to U. S. national security.
The State Department on July 7 alerted U.S. travelers to violent crime in Venezuela and warned that political rallies and demonstrations can occur with little notice. Venezuelas government denounced the illegitimate sanctions as imperial pretensions. The U.S. government backed an unsuccessful coup against the Chávez government in 2002 and since has distributed tens of millions of dollars to opposition groups. After three years, it still withholds recognition of Nicolas Maduro as Venezuelas president. These actions speak of a U. S. goal of regime change.
More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/07/14/venezuela-in-crisis-too-much-us-intervention-too-little-socialism/
Good Reads:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016163549
Marksman_91
(2,035 posts)DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Why is there no mention of the world-record crime-rate in Caracas?
Why is there no mention of Venezuela's problematic currency-policy?
Why is there no mention that Venezuela makes it's money by selling oil and that the price of oil is too low?
Why is there no mention that Venezuela has failed to set up monetary reserves?
Why is there no mention of the drought that prevents the hydroelectric dams from working full-time?
Why is there no mention of Maduro refusing to do anything differently in terms of policy?
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)Ideologues don't concern themselves with trivialities. If their models for more perfect societies don't work, they prefer not to look at how their social and economic nostrums fail when put into practice and go back to theory.
DU's rose-tinted glasses-wearing Sandalistas would doubtless claim that saying such distasteful thing "proves" that I am somehow a tool of international bankers and mega-corporations. They're wrong. I strongly oppose the right wing theoreticians currently foisting their disastrous economic models on places like Oklahoma, Kansas, Wisconsin, and Mississippi because their thinking processes operate in all-too-similar ruts--letting political theory override real-world observation and analysis.
Response to Vogon_Glory (Reply #3)
Post removed
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)FBaggins
(26,733 posts)I'd be very interested to know where more socialism would even be possible.