Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
Thu Dec 29, 2011, 03:14 PM Dec 2011

A broader definition of rape

---

The language the advisory board crafted defines rape as a crime against a woman or man that involves any vaginal or anal penetration by any object or body part. It also includes oral sexual penetration as a rape act. It drops the word "forcibly," and states that these acts are a crime if they occur without consent.

This overdue change is not just symbolic. Academics, legislators and public officials rely on the statistics when crafting laws and setting policy. What's more, understating rape's occurrence, women's advocates say, not only misleads the public about the prevalence of the crime, but also hinders funding for enforcement and treatment programs.

"From a citizen's point of view, you can't monitor something if you can't measure it," said Carol Tracy, executive director of the Women's Law Project, who began lobbying the FBI to make the change 10 years ago.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-rape-20111222,0,5797126.story

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
5. The only question is, could a man be charged with rape....
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 10:44 PM
Dec 2011

...if during consentual sexual activity he initiated a particular sexual act without asking which she rebuffed and he stopped.....do you always get one "no"?

 

lumberjack_jeff

(33,224 posts)
6. The FBI statistical reporting will change, not the underlying laws.
Sat Dec 31, 2011, 01:29 AM
Dec 2011

Until this change, many crimes that people would generally consider rape would not counted as such by the FBI.

If the hypothetical example you are talking about wasn't a crime last year, it's still not a crime today. If was a crime... then it still is.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
7. Agreed, but it also must have a very definite definition
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 01:50 AM
Jan 2012

Otherwise Fundie Christians will claim we're "raping them with our eyes"

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
8. Yeah, I always wondered what I was supposed to be interested in instead.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 10:32 AM
Jan 2012

When you are just a big fancy male ape, it's sort of natural to be interested in other apes, and esp. cute little female apes of breeding age.

Nevertheless, one ought to be polite, and not stare at women who do not want to be stared at, or anybody else for that matter.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
9. But of course, but there is no such thing as "raping a woman with your eyes"
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jan 2012

As the Dworkins and McKinnons would suggest

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»A broader definition of r...