Men's Group
Related: About this forumA broader definition of rape
---
The language the advisory board crafted defines rape as a crime against a woman or man that involves any vaginal or anal penetration by any object or body part. It also includes oral sexual penetration as a rape act. It drops the word "forcibly," and states that these acts are a crime if they occur without consent.
This overdue change is not just symbolic. Academics, legislators and public officials rely on the statistics when crafting laws and setting policy. What's more, understating rape's occurrence, women's advocates say, not only misleads the public about the prevalence of the crime, but also hinders funding for enforcement and treatment programs.
"From a citizen's point of view, you can't monitor something if you can't measure it," said Carol Tracy, executive director of the Women's Law Project, who began lobbying the FBI to make the change 10 years ago.
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-rape-20111222,0,5797126.story
Boston_Chemist
(256 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)is perfect wording because it should leave no doubt.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)...if during consentual sexual activity he initiated a particular sexual act without asking which she rebuffed and he stopped.....do you always get one "no"?
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)Until this change, many crimes that people would generally consider rape would not counted as such by the FBI.
If the hypothetical example you are talking about wasn't a crime last year, it's still not a crime today. If was a crime... then it still is.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)Otherwise Fundie Christians will claim we're "raping them with our eyes"
bemildred
(90,061 posts)When you are just a big fancy male ape, it's sort of natural to be interested in other apes, and esp. cute little female apes of breeding age.
Nevertheless, one ought to be polite, and not stare at women who do not want to be stared at, or anybody else for that matter.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)As the Dworkins and McKinnons would suggest