Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
Fri May 15, 2015, 04:25 PM May 2015

Weekend Economists Visit Borinquen, La Isla del Encanto May 15-17, 2015

FUN FACT: Today is a numerical palindrome 5/15/15/ or 51515




See that sad little, forgotten island in the Greater Antilles on the far right? That's where we are going this Weekend...




Puerto Ricans often call the island Borinquen - a derivation of Borikén, its indigenous Taíno name, which means "Land of the Valiant Lord". The terms boricua and borincano derive from Borikén and Borinquen respectively, and are commonly used to identify someone of Puerto Rican heritage. The island is also popularly known in Spanish as la isla del encanto, meaning "the island of enchantment".

Columbus named the island San Juan Bautista, in honor of the Catholic Saint John the Baptist, while the capital city was named Ciudad de Puerto Rico (English: Rich Port City). Eventually traders and other maritime visitors came to refer to the entire island as Puerto Rico, while San Juan became the name used for the main trading/shipping port and the capital city.




60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Weekend Economists Visit Borinquen, La Isla del Encanto May 15-17, 2015 (Original Post) Demeter May 2015 OP
Thom Hartmann "The Crash of 2016" Demeter May 2015 #1
Thom Hartmann on "The Crash of 2016: The Plot to Destroy America—and What We Can Do to Stop It" Demeter May 2015 #11
Optimists! MattSh May 2015 #35
TPP - Wikileaks has released a bombshell Demeter May 2015 #2
I missed one! We Lost a Bank Last Weekend! Demeter May 2015 #3
GREECE'S Creditors push for reform proposals as talks resume Demeter May 2015 #4
SEC a stumbling block in banks' forex guilty pleas: sources Demeter May 2015 #5
Draghi: ECB Remains Committed to Full QE Implementation Demeter May 2015 #6
Of course they do. mother earth May 2015 #13
Trade supporters breathe easier as U.S. trade bill clears Senate hurdle Demeter May 2015 #7
The Federal Reserve: Railing against bailing Demeter May 2015 #8
The Man Who Stole Puerto Rico Demeter May 2015 #9
Consumer caution keeps retail sales flat in April Demeter May 2015 #10
Our Democracy Is Doomed: Match the Plutocrat to the GOP Candidate He Owns Demeter May 2015 #12
Dollar weakens against the euro for the 5th straight week Demeter May 2015 #14
Oooh! Puerto Rico!! DemReadingDU May 2015 #15
I'm already started Demeter May 2015 #16
Is that Margaritaville just above Venezuela? Fuddnik May 2015 #17
Basic facts about Puerto Rico Demeter May 2015 #18
The Road to Hell is Paved With Good Intentions Demeter May 2015 #19
Will the TransPacific Partnership Agreement Go into the Deep Freeze? Demeter May 2015 #20
The history of Puerto Rico Demeter May 2015 #21
Spanish rule (1493–1898) Demeter May 2015 #22
QE Exit Strategy, Part One: ZIRP Demeter May 2015 #23
RRP means Reverse RePo, is the reply Demeter May 2015 #25
Is Washington Coming To Its Senses? By Paul Craig Roberts Demeter May 2015 #24
The One Percenters' Tax Loopholes and Unindicted Frauds: Audacious Oligarchy Demeter May 2015 #26
Schumer Organizes Democratic Collapse on TPP Demeter May 2015 #27
So here are your 14 Democratic pro-TPP senators Demeter May 2015 #28
More than 1,000 plaintiffs file lawsuit to keep Japan out of TPP Demeter May 2015 #29
Consumer Confidence Plunges Below Any Economist's Estimate; Consumers Shock Economists Demeter May 2015 #30
Consumers Did What They Said Demeter May 2015 #31
Court vacates $85 million award for Oregon National Guardsmen in Iraq health case Demeter May 2015 #32
New York District Court Denies Immunity To NYPD Officers Who Arrested A Citizen For Filming Them Demeter May 2015 #33
How the IRS seized a man’s life savings without ever charging him with a crime Demeter May 2015 #34
Washington Post and NYTimes do not allow me to read them without paying. kickysnana May 2015 #38
What’s in a Name? Political Correctness - Strategic Culture Foundation MattSh May 2015 #36
World population-food supply balance is becoming increasingly unstable, study finds MattSh May 2015 #37
Going off on my own tangent for a couple of minutes... MattSh May 2015 #39
I'm a tad worried by Xchrom guys...... Hotler May 2015 #40
Me too. Fuddnik May 2015 #41
Not since March 18 DemReadingDU May 2015 #58
I would strongly recommend running out and buying the June Issue Of Harpers. Must read. Fuddnik May 2015 #42
Some still think he can't do anything wrong DemReadingDU May 2015 #57
Why 25,000 Detroit Residents Will Soon Have Their Water Turned Off Demeter May 2015 #43
FROM JANUARY Ukraine Agrees To Monsanto Land Grab For $17 Billion IMF Loan Demeter May 2015 #44
FROM FEBRUARY US to allow armed drone exports Demeter May 2015 #45
Senate Democrats Work w/GOP Throw Medicare Under Bus as Part of TPP Fast Track Sausage-Making Demeter May 2015 #46
Don’t Be So Sure the Economy Will Return to Normal Demeter May 2015 #47
that's essentially what they're doing at the call center I just left magical thyme May 2015 #60
Wall Street Just Got More Pessimistic About the U.S. Economy. Will the Fed Follow Suit? Demeter May 2015 #48
University Quake Scientists Dismissed: Dean's E-Mail Demeter May 2015 #49
Kansas could lose millions for limiting welfare recipients to $25 at ATMs Demeter May 2015 #50
MEANWHILE...Silicon Valley Is Letting Go of Its Techie Island Fantasies Demeter May 2015 #51
Ukraine says creditors must accept debt proposals BEGINNNING TO SWEAT Demeter May 2015 #52
Ukraine economy shrinks 17.6 percent in Q1 as government struggles to cope with conflict Demeter May 2015 #53
Questions Raised Over Poroshenko's Role In Valuable Kyiv Land Deal Demeter May 2015 #54
Vladimir Putin calls Ukraine fascist and country’s new law helps make his case Demeter May 2015 #55
The weather is unsettled...damp and warm and cloudy Demeter May 2015 #56
Germany to Ban Paper Money and Dry out the Drugs Market Demeter May 2015 #59
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
11. Thom Hartmann on "The Crash of 2016: The Plot to Destroy America—and What We Can Do to Stop It"
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:36 PM
May 2015


ANOTHER INTERVIEW

MattSh

(3,714 posts)
35. Optimists!
Sat May 16, 2015, 12:25 PM
May 2015

I've got this feeling that it will happen sooner than that. Then again, I thought this a few times the last couple of years.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
3. I missed one! We Lost a Bank Last Weekend!
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:05 PM
May 2015
Edgebrook Bank, Chicago, Illinois, was closed May 8th by the Illinois Department of Financial & Professional Regulation – Division of Banking, which appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. To protect the depositors, the FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with Republic Bank of Chicago, Oak Brook, Illinois, to assume all of the deposits of Edgebrook Bank.

The sole branch of Edgebrook Bank will reopen during normal business hours. Depositors of Edgebrook Bank will automatically become depositors of Republic Bank of Chicago. Deposits will continue to be insured by the FDIC, so there is no need for customers to change their banking relationship in order to retain their deposit insurance coverage up to applicable limits. Customers of Edgebrook Bank should continue to use their current branch until they receive notice from Republic Bank of Chicago that systems conversions have been completed to allow full-service banking at all branches of Republic Bank of Chicago.

Depositors of Edgebrook Bank can continue to access their money by writing checks or using ATM or debit cards. Checks drawn on the bank will continue to be processed. Loan customers should continue to make their payments as usual.

As of March 31, 2015, Edgebrook Bank had approximately $90.0 million in total assets and $90.0 million in total deposits. In addition to assuming all of the deposits of Edgebrook Bank, Republic Bank of Chicago agreed to purchase approximately $79.7 million of the failed bank's assets. The FDIC will retain the remaining assets for later disposition...The FDIC estimates that the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) will be $16.8 million. Compared to other alternatives, Republic Bank of Chicago's acquisition was the least costly resolution for the FDIC's DIF. Edgebrook Bank is the fifth FDIC-insured institution in the nation to fail this year, and the second in Illinois. The last FDIC-insured institution closed in the state was Highland Community Bank, Chicago, on January 23, 2015.
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
4. GREECE'S Creditors push for reform proposals as talks resume
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:10 PM
May 2015
http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite1_1_14/05/2015_550056

Negotiations between Greece and its creditors resumed at the technical level via teleconference on Thursday. Meanwhile, with pressure for a deal growing as cash reserves dwindle, Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis proposed that Greece push back the repayment of bonds held by the European Central Bank.

The so-called Brussels Group, comprising representatives of the government and the country’s creditors, spoke by teleconference on Thursday. The Greek side was based at the Maximos Mansion while Varoufakis convened a separate meeting with his general secretaries at the ministry. According to sources, the technical talks focused on lingering differences between the two sides: the size of the budget gap, which will determine the extent of the measures that Greece will be obliged to take, pension and labor sector reforms, as well as changes to value-added tax. Another teleconference is understood to be planned for Friday with the Greek team expected to travel to Brussels over the weekend ahead of a possible face-to-face meeting on Monday. According to sources, creditors want Greece to present them with a list of proposed reforms in the coming days, preferably by Sunday.

Earlier in the day government spokesman Gavriil Sakellaridis admitted that the creditors were pushing Greece on certain thorny issues including private sector wages which they continue to regard as too high.

Varoufakis did not go into detail about reforms being discussed. But he told Parliament that VAT on the Greek islands, many of which enjoy a favorable status, will not be increased before summer.

Comments made by the minister earlier at a conference sponsored by the Economist, according to which the scheduled repayment of Greek bonds held by the ECB this summer should be pushed back, caused a stir. Varoufakis noted, in comments later in Parliament, that the idea of a “swap” between the Greek government and the ECB “fills Mr Draghi’s soul with fear,” referring to the bank’s president, Mario Draghi. He added that the ECB chief “is in a big struggle against the Bundesbank.”

In a related development, Bundesbank chief Jens Weidmann criticized the ECB over its provision of emergency funding to Greece, noting that it is not the role of the ECB to finance governments.


 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
5. SEC a stumbling block in banks' forex guilty pleas: sources
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:11 PM
May 2015
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/05/15/us-forex-rigging-pleas-idUSKBN0NZ2FZ20150515?feedType=RSS

Banks want assurances from U.S. regulators that they will not be barred from certain businesses before agreeing to plead guilty to criminal charges over the manipulation of foreign exchange rates, causing a delay in multibillion-dollar settlements, people familiar with the matter said.

In an unprecedented move, the parent companies or main banking units of JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), Citigroup Inc (C.N), Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc (RBS.L), Barclays Plc (BARC.L) and UBS Group AG (UBSG.VX) are likely to plead guilty to rigging foreign exchange rates to benefit their transactions.

The banks are also scrambling to line up exemptions or waivers from the Securities and Exchanges Commission and other federal regulators because criminal pleas trigger consequences such as removing the ability to manage retirement plans or raise capital easily.

In the past, waivers have generally been granted without a hitch. However, the practice has become controversial in the past year, particularly at the SEC, where Democratic Commissioner Kara Stein has criticized the agency for rubber stamping requests and being too soft on repeat offenders...
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
6. Draghi: ECB Remains Committed to Full QE Implementation
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:14 PM
May 2015
https://www.marketnews.com/content/updatedraghi-ecb-remains-committed-full-qe-implementation

European Central Bank President Mario Draghi said Thursday that the Bank was committed to the full implementation of its quantitative easing programme.

Speaking as part of the Michael Camdessus Central Banking Lecture to the International Monetary Fund in Washington, Draghi said that though the Governing Council was seeing substantial effects from its currency policy stance on both asset prices and economic confidence, it would nonetheless keep its current purchase targets in place until at least September 2016 or "until we see a sustained adjustment in the path of inflation."

"While we have already seen a substantial effect of our measures on asset prices and economic confidence, what ultimately matters is that we see an equivalent effect on investment, consumption and inflation," Draghi argued. "To that effect, we will implement in full our purchase programme as announced."

"After almost 7 years of a debilitating sequence of crises, firms and households are very hesitant to take on economic risk," Draghi continued. "For this reason quite some time is needed before we can declare success, and our monetary policy stimulus will stay in place as long as needed for its objective to be fully achieved on a truly sustained basis."


Speaking to the success of the Bank's various easing policies, Draghi also noted the impact credit measures have had on bank lending in the Eurozone economy.

"Our bank lending survey confirms that competition for good credit among banks has increased. This has squeezed margins and caused bank lending rates to fall," Draghi said. "Lower rates have in turn created more net demand for borrowing. And banks have then begun to search for the "next tier" of borrowers, leading to a gradual easing of credit standards and - we expect - a further strengthening of competitive pressures."

Draghi also addressed a recurring theme within the Bank's monetary policy remit: the potential increase of financial stability risks as a result of a prolonged period of low interest rates and easing measures. The ECB President acknowledged the need to be vigilant with respect to financial imbalances, but noted there was little indication at present that such imbalances were emerging, particularly in real estate markets or credit growth.

"While a period of low interest rates will inevitably result in some local misallocation of resources, it does not follow that it has to threaten overall financial stability," Draghi said. "This hinges crucially on monetary policy being embedded in a complementary set of supervisory and regulatory policies that create incentives for balance sheet adjustment and responsible financial behaviour."

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
13. Of course they do.
Fri May 15, 2015, 06:03 PM
May 2015


Published on Mar 11, 2015
European Central Bank’s Trillion Euro QE plan to make the economy grow will only help keep the banks a float.

(And for those who don't understand the reason for the drive toward privatization, this interview spells it out. Same poison hijacking the nations and people everywhere.)
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
7. Trade supporters breathe easier as U.S. trade bill clears Senate hurdle
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:22 PM
May 2015
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/05/14/us-usa-trade-idUSKBN0NZ0AY20150514

A 12-nation Pacific trade agreement cleared a crucial test in the U.S. Senate on Thursday, giving a resounding thumbs-up to legislation that holds the key to President Barack Obama's diplomatic pivot to Asia. Just two days after Democrats defied Obama to block debate on a bill to "fast-track" trade deals such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade deal through Congress, the Senate voted 65 to 33 to move ahead with consideration of the measure. Strong support for the bill on this second go-round suggests senators are unlikely to reject the bill, although heated debate is still expected in the Senate over amendments and later in the House of Representatives, where many Democrats staunchly oppose the TPP on fears trade liberalization will cost U.S. jobs.

The about-face came after Democrats won a separate vote on a bill punishing countries that manipulate their currencies to keep their exports cheap, and followed a renewed round of personal lobbying by Obama. Thirteen of 44 Democrats joined with Republicans, who voted in lock-step to give backers of the legislation more than the 60 votes needed to proceed in the 100-member Senate.

Under fast-track, the U.S. Congress can approve or reject trade deals such as the TPP deal, but it cannot amend the contents of the pact, a centerpiece of Obama's strategy to counter China's rising economic and diplomatic clout in Asia. Obama's aggressive defense of fast-track has put him at odds with the left wing of the Democratic Party, pitting him against Senator Elizabeth Warren, a leading liberal voice. The president played down those differences on Thursday, saying he shared many of the left's concerns about trade but that blocking trade deals was not the way to fix problems.

The Senate is expected to debate amendments to the fast-track bill next week and Republican Senator Rob Portman, a former U.S. Trade Representative, said he would seek to write sanctions against currency manipulators into trade deals, a move backed by U.S. automakers such as Ford Motor Co. The White House, which has warned such sanctions would derail the TPP, has so far side-stepped a clash by convincing Democrats to isolate currency rules into a separate customs bill. That passed the Senate with the support of all Democrats and more than half the chamber's Republicans. Portman said he would also seek to include those rules - allowing import duties against currency cheats - into fast-track itself. Democratic Senator Charles Schumer said action on currency might be needed as a sweetener for fast-track in the House, where many Democrats say labor and environmental protections fall short and some conservative Republicans oppose any more power for Obama. "There's a broad feeling we have to do something against China," Schumer said. Many lawmakers blame China's trade gains on an overly-weak Chinese currency. Obama said he had spoken to Schumer and other lawmakers concerned about currency manipulation on how to find language that would not have a "blow-back" effect on U.S. monetary policy.

House Speaker John Boehner, a Republican, said any attempt to legislate currency levels would be “laughable,” signaling that Republicans, who have a majority in the House, would push strongly against currency rules.

Passage is already far from assured, with House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi voicing concerns of her own...The fast-track bill would effectively give Obama and his successor six years to negotiate additional trade deals that could not be amended by Congress. “I would hope there could be some addressing of the length of time,” Pelosi told reporters.


HOTLER, PICK UP THE WHITE COURTESY PHONE, PLEASE!
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
8. The Federal Reserve: Railing against bailing
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:23 PM
May 2015
http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21651282-congress-launches-new-attacks-americas-central-bank-railing-against-bailing

DURING a financial panic, said Walter Bagehot, a former editor of The Economist, a central bank should help the deserving and let the reckless go under. Bagehot reckoned that the monetary guardians should follow four rules: lend freely, but only to solvent firms, against good collateral and at high rates. Many American politicians complain that the Federal Reserve is all too happy to lend, but that it ignores Bagehot’s other dictums. On May 13th two senators of very different hues—Elizabeth Warren, a darling of the left, and David Vitter, a southern conservative—joined forces to introduce a bill that would restrict the Fed’s ability to lend during the next financial panic. Does that make sense?

Emergency lending under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act was one of the most controversial policy responses to the financial crisis. In a letter to Janet Yellen, the chair of the Fed, Ms Warren and Mr Vitter say that from 2007 to 2009 the Fed provided over $13 trillion to support financial institutions. The loans were cheap. A study from 2013 by the Levy Institute, a nonpartisan think-tank, found that many of them were “below or at the market rates” (sometimes less than 1%). Many of the banks that benefited were insolvent at the time. And much of the $13 trillion went to just three banks (Citigroup, Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley), leading many to suspect that the Fed was indulging favoured firms.

Critics focus on details but miss the big picture, counters the Fed. Elizabeth Duke, a former governor, says that the Fed targeted its lending programmes at the right markets, such that it helped to stop the crisis from getting even worse. Jerome Powell, a current governor, points out that “every single loan we made was repaid in full, on time, with interest.”

But whether the Fed should be able to offer this kind of financial support at all is a different question. Choosing certain firms or markets to receive credit over others is inherently problematic, says a recent paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. The prospect of easy money encourages firms to take excessive risks. And according to a paper by Alexander Mehra, then of Harvard Law School, the Fed “exceeded the bounds of its statutory authority” when it bought privately issued securities as well as making loans.

The Dodd-Frank Act, passed in 2010, was supposed to ensure that the Fed never again made such large, open-ended commitments. Congress told the Fed’s board to ensure that emergency lending propped up the financial system as a whole, not individual firms. However, say Ms Warren and Mr Vitter, the Fed has not implemented the new rules in the spirit of the law. The new bill proposes a number of Bagehot-like changes: to toughen up the definition of insolvency, such that the Fed lends only to viable firms; to offer any lending programme to many different institutions; and to ensure that when the Fed does lend, it charges punitive rates....
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
9. The Man Who Stole Puerto Rico
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:27 PM
May 2015
http://waragainstallpuertoricans.com/2015/05/08/the-man-who-stole-puerto-rico/

General Nelson A. Miles

“Porto Ricans are a heterogenous mass of mongrels incapable of self-government… savages addicted to head-hunting and cannibalism.”

– Senator William B. Bate (D-Tennessee)

“The whole hemisphere will be ours in fact. By virtue of our superiority of race, it already is ours morally.”

– President William Howard Taft


On May 12, 1898, twelve US Navy ships bombarded San Juan for three hours. The sky turned black with cannon smoke. Homes were hit. Streets were torn. El Morro lighthouse and La Iglesia de San José, a 16th century church, were shelled repeatedly. Thirty thousand people fled the town in abject terror. A few weeks later, planting his flag in the Ponce town square, US commander Gen. Nelson A. Miles, declared that:

“The chief object of the American military forces will be…to give to the people of your beautiful island the largest measure of liberties consistent with military occupation.

We have not come to make war against a people of a country that for centuries has been oppressed, but on the contrary, to bring you protection, to promote your prosperity, to bestow upon you the immunities and blessings of the liberal institutions of our government…and to give the advantages and blessings of enlightened civilization.”


The “blessings” and “advantages” were few. Instead, immediately after the US invasion of 1898, a wave of carpetbaggers swarmed over the island like a plague of locusts. Within forty years, they picked her clean of her natural resources. Any Puerto Rican who opposed this too vigorously was shot, imprisoned, or simply “disappeared.”

Every few years, the US government sent four men to ensure this colonial relationship: the Chief Auditor of the island, the Treasurer, the Chief of Police, and the Governor.

The Governor had the greatest authority, since he could hire and fire the other three...
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
10. Consumer caution keeps retail sales flat in April
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:33 PM
May 2015
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-retail-sales-april-20150514-story.html

S. consumers kept their money in their wallets in April, stalling retail sales despite warmer weather and the Easter holiday, which traditionally give stores a spring boost.

Retail sales were flat last month compared with March, the Commerce Department said Wednesday. The tally ticked up 0.1% without motor vehicle and parts spending, which tends to be volatile.

Analysts said shoppers continue to be wary of spending, which led to a string of lackluster months in winter before the slight climb in retail sales last month.

"Clearly consumers are not about to embark on a spending spree," said Sung Won Sohn, an economist at Cal State Channel Islands. "Consumers' caution is supported by less spending on discretionary items, from electronics to furniture."

Although some experts had predicted pent-up demand would push shoppers into stores once the weather thawed, many consumers opted to pay down debt or sock away their savings from cheaper gasoline prices. And now that fuel prices have rebounded, shoppers have even less cash to splurge on trips to the mall....

FUNNY HOW THAT WORKS
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
12. Our Democracy Is Doomed: Match the Plutocrat to the GOP Candidate He Owns
Fri May 15, 2015, 05:51 PM
May 2015
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/our-democracy-doomed-match-plutocrat-gop-candidate-he-owns?akid=13106.227380.sFBFLV&rd=1&src=newsletter1036354&t=5

“Whether it's the Koch brothers or Soros on the left or Sheldon," former GOP presidential candidate Newt Gingrich recently said, “if you're going to have an election process that radically favors billionaires and is discriminating against the middle class—which we now have—then billionaires are going to get a lot of attention.”



The 2012 GOP race was marked by the presence of billionaires anointing candidates with their millions and gaining outsized influence over the outcome, duration, and policies of the GOP primary. The 2016 race, only a couple months old, looks to be following the same course. Here are the candidates the billionaires are looking at so far:


  1. Sheldon Adelson Adelson, the 12th richest man in America at an estimated $32 billion, may be the biggest single figure in Republican politics. With seemingly endless amounts of money to spend and a monomaniacal focus on neoconservative foreign policy, Adelson not only gains the attentions of GOP candidates but also skews their policies. The right doesn’t lack for pressure to support Israel, but Adelson makes that support a dealbreaker. Is there a more gauche way to put that? “It is not complicated for Republican politicians to come to the RJC and say they’ll stand with Israel,” said Senator Ted Cruz, speaking at Adelson’s summit in as Vegas recently. “Unless you’re a blithering idiot, that’s what you say when you come to the RJC.” Yes, but usually that’s the part you don’t say out loud. In 2012 Adelson spent $100 million, the most of any single donor, with $15 million ultimately going to Gingrich’s otherwise floppy campaign. This year hopefuls like Cruz, Rick Perry, and Scott Walker, all of whom appeal to his fiscal conservatism, are auditioning for his fortunes. But early reports have it that Marco Rubio, who’s fashioned himself as the foreign policy candidate of the 2016 field, has Adelson’s eye. “Adelson’s attraction to Rubio is in no small part centered on the Florida senator’s outspoken support for Israel, an issue near and dear to the billionaire’s heart,” Politico reported recently. “Rubio has reached out to Adelson more often than any other 2016 candidate, sources close to Adelson say, and has provided him with the most detailed plan for how he’d manage America’s foreign policy.”

    It’s also been rumored that religious conservative candidate Mike Huckabee has gotten Adelson’s attention, in what could be a virtual repeat of Gingrich’s candidacy. While Huckabee doesn’t boast the party-wide appeal to win more than Iowa and a couple of southern states, with Adelson’s war chest he could survive for much longer, pressing his aggressive evangelical message along the way. Huckabee skipped 2012 due to a lack of funds and an expressed disinterest in fundraising. But having won the Adelson Defender of Israel award last year, he perhaps has an inside shot at the one donor who would solve that problem for him.

    As has been pointed out, by dangling his wealth Adelson can influence without spending by dragging candidates closer to his position. See Senator Rand Paul, whose non-interventionist foreign policy views make him unique among the hawkish crowd, and also put him at odds with the casino mogul. There were rumors that Adelson would fund a drive to stop Paul should his candidacy gain momentum. With that in mind Paul met with Adelson when he was in Washington, D.C. in March to attend Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s controversial congressional address. Paul reported a productive meeting between the two. And while he likely won’t see any of Adelson’s money—Adelson’s theory that Iran should be nuked doesn’t sit too well with Paul’s policies—he may have at least neutralized a very wealthy threat. Meanwhile, Adelson influenced Paul’s policies without spending a dime.

  2. Foster Freiss 2012 candidate Rick Santorum owed most of his surprisingly successful campaign to financial investor Foster Friess, who used his wealth to prolong Santorum’s run, as Adelson did for Gingrich. But unlike Gingrich, whose campaign sputtered over its own pointlessness, Santorum wound up winning 11 primaries, forcing eventual nominee Mitt Romney to defend his conservative flank and use up needed campaign funds, weakening him for the general election. The upshot: Santorum and his socially conservative agenda were firmly established within the GOP. Friess must have felt this a worthy payout for his $2 million: he recently announced he would bankroll Santorum again in 2016. However, this time around, Santorum may find his portion of the GOP field more crowded, with figures like Huckabee and Cruz trying to claim the religious conservative mantle. And Friess has flirted with Walker in the past, donating to his successful defeat of a recall campaign.

  3. Robert Mercer Just days after Ted Cruz became the first major GOP candidate to announce his campaign, he reported a startling $31 million fundraising effort spread across four different PACs. According to political watchers, this was a record for money raised in a single week, instantly establishing Cruz as a serious primary contender. So who’s bankrolling Cruz? Robert Mercer. A hedge fund investor, Mercer appears to be attracted to Cruz’s near-comical devotion to fiscal conservatism, which includes a plan to abolish the IRS. (Mercer’s troubles with the IRS might have something to do with that.) Mother Jones has a good rundown of Mercer’s previous contributions totaling $40 million, which makes him one of the biggest donors of the 2014 cycle, for which he saw far greater success than Adelson did in 2012. Mercer and his wife were behind most of Cruz’s $31 million haul. The pair has helped Cruz found a bench of super PACs to which donors can donate for specific causes, “whether it’s competing in the early primary states, putting ads on the air, or investing in data and analytics,” per the National Review.

  4. Koch Brothers David and Charles Koch, a pair of hugely wealthy businessmen maniacally committed to implementing a big-business libertarianism across the country, spent $400 million in 2012, albeit with not much to show for it. According to their budget, they expect to more than double that in 2016, planning to spend $889 million on a collection of electoral measures, state candidates, and a presidential nominee. That budget gives the Koch brothers a financial footprint equal to the two major political parties. The constellation of 300-400 high-priced donors the Koch brothers have assembled “represent[s] the largest concentration of political money outside the party establishment.” Those several hundred donors route their contributions through a phalanx of funds, which target everything from policy issues to state candidates. The Kochs expect to spend about a third of its $900 million on the national race, a figure still comparative to what the major parties spent last time around. No wonder people are talking about “the Koch Primary.” Nearly every major potential GOP candidate, from Cruz to Chris Christie, have paid private visits to the Kochs. Rand Paul has golfed with them. Marco Rubio has made himself a regular speaker at Americans for Prosperity events. Even longshot candidates like Indiana Governor Mike Pence have made their presence known to the Kochs. The brothers said recently they have narrowed their selections down to five candidates, telling USA Today it is between Cruz, Paul, Rubio, Walker, and Bush. The Kochs do not intend to make their pick soon, instead intimating they may support several candidates initially—and expect to hear a tailored message in return. "What we expect them to do is to compete on who has a more positive message for America, rather than what's wrong with some other candidate and did he smoke pot when he was 15 or whatever,” Charles Koch said. An early rumor said the Kochs were starry-eyed for Scott Walker, whom they have supported since he first arrived on the scene in 2009, supporting the fight against Wisconsin public sector unions that made Walker a nationwide figure and contributing millions to his campaign to defeat a recall in response. The list of potential candidates the Koch brothers released days after the Walker rumor suggest they were trying to tamp down the notion that they’d already selected a candidate.

    The Kochs are less interested in establishment candidates. Mitt Romney hasn’t gotten an invitation to the Kochs' annual retreat. Meanwhile, Jeb Bush, whose prolific early fundraising gives him an independence his rival candidates lack, skipped this year’s Koch retreat due to a “scheduling conflict”—a sign he’s flush enough with campaign cash not to be beholden to any particular benefactor.

    Evan McMurry is a political editor at Mediaite, interviews editor at Newfound: An Inquiry of Place, a regular reviewer at Bookslut, and the founding editor of A Flea In The Fur of the Beast. Find him on Twitter or contact him at evanmcmurry@yahoo.com.
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
14. Dollar weakens against the euro for the 5th straight week
Fri May 15, 2015, 06:09 PM
May 2015
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dollar-threatens-5th-straight-week-of-weakness-against-euro-2015-05-15?siteid=YAHOOB

The dollar depreciated against the euro for a fifth straight week on Friday, as weak U.S. economic data prompted traders to push back their expectations for when the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates.

A preliminary reading of consumer sentiment in May by the University of Michigan came in at 88.6, down from 95.9 in April — a seven-year low. That, combined with a disappointing result for the May Empire State manufacturing index and the Federal Reserve’s April reading on industrial-production activity pushed the dollar 0.3% lower against the euro Friday. The data showed that the second-quarter rebound that many economists, including Federal Reserve policy makers, had hoped for has yet to fully materialize.

“It’s not the huge rally we had [in the second quarter] last year,” said Colin Cieszynski, chief markets strategist at CMC Markets.

The euro EURUSD, +0.3418% traded at $1.1446, a three-month high, compared with $1.1400 Thursday; the pound GBPUSD, -0.3169% traded at $1.5725, compared with $1.5774 Thursday; the dollar USDJPY, +0.09% traded at ¥119.38, compared with ¥119.21.

The ICE U.S. Dollar Index DXY, -0.17% a measure of the dollar’s strength against a basket of six rivals, was down 0.2% to 93.2710.

Earlier in the week, a retail-sales report showed that consumer spending was flat in April.

Rate-hike expectations have shifted dramatically this year, said Kathy Lien, managing director of FX Strategy at BK Asset Management. The futures market is now pricing in a greater than 50% probability that the central bank will raise interest rates in December for the first time since 2006, compared with September. ...MORE
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
18. Basic facts about Puerto Rico
Sat May 16, 2015, 07:36 AM
May 2015

Puerto Rico (English /ˌpɔrtə ˈriːkoʊ/ or /ˌpwɛərtə ˈriːkoʊ/; Spanish: ˈpweɾto ˈriko), officially the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Spanish: Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, pronounced: esˈtaðo ˈli?ɾe asoˈsjaðo ðe ˈpweɾto ˈriko, literally the Free Associated State of Puerto Rico), is a United States territory located in the northeastern Caribbean, east of the Dominican Republic, and west of both the United States Virgin Islands and the British Virgin Islands.

Puerto Rico is an archipelago that includes the main island of Puerto Rico and a number of smaller islands, the largest of which are Vieques, Culebra, and Mona. The main island of Puerto Rico is, by land area, the smallest of the Greater Antilles. With around 3.5 million people, it ranks third in population among that group of four islands, which include Cuba, Hispaniola (Haiti and the Dominican Republic) and Jamaica. The capital and largest city is San Juan. Due to its location, Puerto Rico has a tropical climate with warm weather year-round and does not observe daylight saving time. Its official languages are Spanish, which is prevalent, and English.

Originally populated for centuries by aboriginal people known as Taíno, the island was claimed by Christopher Columbus for Spain during his second voyage to the Americas on November 19, 1493. Like Cuba, Puerto Rico remained a Spanish colony until 1898. Despite the Laws of Burgos of 1512 and other decrees for the protection of Indians, some Taíno people were forced into slavery in the early years of colonization. The population suffered extremely high fatalities from epidemics of European infectious diseases.

During the four centuries of Spanish rule, the island's culture and physical landscape were transformed. European knowledge, customs and traditions were introduced, namely Roman Catholicism, the Spanish language, and advances such as agriculture, construction in stone, and the printing press. Numerous public buildings, forts, churches and public infrastructure built during Spanish rule are still standing to this day, forming an indelible part of the island's cultural heritage.

Regular convoys of the West Indies Fleet linked the island to Spain, sailing from Cádiz to the Spanish West Indies every year. From the start of Puerto Rico's colonization by Spain in 1508, its inhabitants were Spanish citizens, and it remained Spanish territory despite invasion attempts by the French, Dutch, and the British. On November 25, 1897, Spain granted limited self-government to the island by royal decree in the Autonomic Charter, including a bicameral legislature. But in 1898, Spain ceded its control of the island to United States following the Spanish–American War, under the terms of the Treaty of Paris.

Today, people born in Puerto Rico are natural-born U.S. citizens. The territory operates under a local constitution, and Puerto Ricans elect their own governor. However, Puerto Rico lacks voting members in Congress and is subject to the plenary jurisdiction of the United States under the Puerto Rico Federal Relations Act of 1950. As of 2015, Puerto Rico remains a U.S. territory, although a 2012 referendum showed a majority (54% of the electorate) in favor of a change in status, with full statehood the preferred option.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
20. Will the TransPacific Partnership Agreement Go into the Deep Freeze?
Sat May 16, 2015, 07:51 AM
May 2015

I'D PREFER THE BONFIRE, AND MAYBE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BANNING SUCH THINGS...

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/05/will-the-transpacific-partnership-agreement-go-into-the-deep-freeze.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29

Yves here. It’s been discouraging to see a significant portion of members of the commentariat take a “These awful trade deals are inevitable, lie back and think of England” attitude as far as fighting the trade deals are concerned, and are unwilling to make even the small investment of time required to call their Senators and Representative to put their opposition on record.

The battle is going far better than the opposition expected. Obama had planned to have Fast Track authority sail through the Senate so as to prove to the House, where he faces a real fight, that the bill has bipartisan support, Majority Leader John Boehner has made clear that he is not going to pass a bill without having meaningful Democratic party air cover, and he hasn’t seen enough evidence of that in whip counts. The fact that Obama got a visible black eye in the Senate and has lost time in moving the bill forward has strengthened the position of opponents and called more public attention to the process. It also has underminded Obama’s plan to make approval of Fast Track authority seem uncontroversial and inevitable.

This post explains why merely delaying Obama so that he does not get the bill passed in May throws a likely fatal wrench into the entire deal. The Administration is already about as late as it can be in getting the deal done, given the moving parts overseas and the President moving into lame duck territory. One thing the author gets wrong is when Congress goes out of session. The last day for business this month for the House is this Thursday, the 21st, and for the Senate, Friday the 22nd.

So your calls are critical to stiffening the spine of the rebels and letting the traitors know that voters will take their vengeance for a sellout in the next election. As reader Kokuanani pointed out:


As I’ve posted elsewhere with regard to contacting your Senators and Rep., NUMBERS COUNT. The staff members reading e-mails and answering the phones are only reporting the volume of incoming communication and which “side” it supports. Your fabulous essay on the evils of the TPP and Fast Track will never reach the voting member. So don’t waste your time writing it.

Pick one or two arguments (e.g., “secrecy”) and make them. Briefly. Like a sentence or two. Spend the rest of your time getting friends and family to contact Senate offices. The e-mail forms [links provided by Yves] make this ridiculously easy. All you need is a zip code showing you’re in the state. You can walk your pals through the process.

I don’t know how effective contacting the DNC would be, but it can’t hurt, and can alert them that they can’t rely on you for fund-raising or votes.


So please keep the pressure on next week, and get the word to friends, family, and other allies. Here are the Senate contact details and those for your Representative.

By Martin Khor, Executive Director of the South Centre, Geneva. Cross-posted from The Star. WRITTEN FROM A MALAYSIAN PERPSECTIVE


Is the TransPacific Partnership Agreement about to be concluded, or will it be put into deep freeze instead? The answer may be known in the next few days or weeks as the controversial TransPacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) negotiations face another crunch time. Last week, U.S. top negotiator Michael Froman was in Kuala Lumpur for a series of meetings. He told the public that Malaysia’s concerns, especially on bumiputra policy, would be taken into account and that by joining the TPP, Malaysia’s economy and exports would grow significantly. Froman also said there was no rush to conclude the TPPA.

In fact, there is an urgency for the talks to conclude within a few weeks because of the US political calendar. Chief negotiators are scheduled to meet in Guam later this week to iron out outstanding issues so that a meeting of trade ministers of the 12 countries can conclude the deal in the Philippines at the end of this month, following the Apec Summit. Why the hurry? The final TPPA has to be approved by the U.S. Congress latest by December to avoid preoccupation with next year’s U.S. presidential elections. An agreement has to be reached by the ministers by May or June, or else the deadline may be missed and the TPPA may have to await a new president and Congress. Other countries won’t negotiate their “bottom line” (or final positions) until the U.S. obtains “fast track authority” from Congress, meaning Congress can only vote yes or no to the whole TPPA, but can’t amend the agreement. The current sitting of Congress ends on May 18, and it has to fast-track the bills by then, or else the negotiators and ministers are unlikely to achieve a breakthrough in their meetings this month. This is one of the many hurdles to cross if the TPPA talks are to succeed.

  • Firstly, Obama’s trade policy is unpopular both with the public and the Democrats. There are doubts whether the fast-track bills (known as Trade Promotion Authority) can be passed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives. If even one of these does not accept the bill, then the TPPA talks will be in trouble, as partners of the United States will have no confidence that what their negotiators agree to will be approved by Congress, which has power over trade deals.

  • Second are the contentious issues in the negotiations which are difficult to resolve. Most of the countries are opposed to the U.S. demands on intellectual property. These will hike the price of medicine, causing them to be even more out of reach of the ordinary people; make it difficult for generic producers to operate; affect access to information and educational materials; and impact on farmers’ rights to save and exchange seeds.

  • Third is the question of benefits. Malaysia’s exports can be expected to increase due to better market access to the other TPPA countries. However, imports will also increase as Malaysia’s tariffs are eliminated. Since our tariffs are generally higher than those of the United States, the most important partner, Malaysia would have to make more concessions and it can be expected that the trade balance would be negatively affected.

  • Fourth are the additional conditions that the United States may impose on other TPP countries, as it has done in previous FTAs with Peru, Guatemala and Australia. Congress members also demand that TPPA countries that are “currency manipulators” (Malaysia has been mentioned as a candidate country) be punished, and that countries involved in human trafficking (Malaysia has been mentioned) be excluded from agreements that enjoy the fast-track treatment.

  • Another issue is the TPPA’s investor-state dispute settlement system (ISDS), which gives power to foreign companies to challenge government policies in a foreign tribunal and to obtain compensation (up to billions of dollars) for loss of future profits. In April, a group of renowned legal experts, including Obama’s old Harvard University law mentor Laurence Tribe, sent a letter to congressional leaders pronouncing that the ISDS is contrary to America’s legal traditions and principles and undermines its democratic norms.

  • Malaysia and some other countries find serious difficulty in the proposed TPPA rules to curb the operations of state-owned enterprises or even private companies in which the government has a stake. This may affect big companies such as Petronas and the many enterprises under Khazanah and possibly PNB and EPF. Negotiations on whether companies can be exempted are under way. Future enterprises will certainly be affected.

  • Government procurement will be opened to foreign goods and companies, above a certain project threshold value. The bumiputra preferences, a cornerstone of the Malaysian political economy, will be affected (though the extent and nature of the effects are still being negotiated). This is within the larger issue of loss of preferences and advantages for local companies and goods (bumiputra and non-bumiputra) via the chapters on investment, procurement, competition and services.

    All these issues are already being hotly debated. If the TPPA negotiations conclude, the texts will at some stage be made public, and the debate can be expected to intensify. But there are many hurdles to cross before that happens, and whether the political deadline can be met is still a big question. This will be answered in the next few weeks.
  •  

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    21. The history of Puerto Rico
    Sat May 16, 2015, 08:03 AM
    May 2015

    The history of Puerto Rico began with the settlement of the archipelago of Puerto Rico by the Ortoiroid people between 3,000 and 2,000 BC. Other tribes, such as the Saladoid and Arawak Indians, populated the island between 430 BC and 1000 AD. At the time of Christopher Columbus's arrival in the New World in 1492, the dominant indigenous culture was that of the Taínos. The Taíno peoples numbers went dangerously low during the latter half of the 16th century because of new infectious diseases carried by Europeans, exploitation by Spanish settlers, and warfare.

    Located in the northeastern Caribbean, Puerto Rico formed a key part of the Spanish Empire from the early years of the exploration, conquest and colonization of the New World. The island was a major military post during many wars between Spain and other European powers for control of the region in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. The smallest of the Greater Antilles, Puerto Rico was a stepping-stone in the passage from Europe to Cuba, Mexico, Central America, and the northern territories of South America.

    Throughout most of the 19th century until the conclusion of the Spanish–American War, Puerto Rico and Cuba were the last two Spanish colonies in the New World; they served as Spain's final outposts in a strategy to regain control of the American continents. These two possessions, however, had been demanding more autonomy and had pro-independence movements since the start of the movements in 1808. Realizing that it was in danger of losing its two remaining Caribbean territories, the Spanish Crown revived the Royal Decree of Graces of 1815. The decree was printed in Spanish, English and French in order to attract Europeans, with the hope that the independence movements would lose their popularity and strength with the arrival of new settlers. Free land was offered to those who wanted to populate the islands on the condition that they swear their loyalty to the Spanish Crown and allegiance to the Roman Catholic Church.

    In 1898, during the Spanish–American War, Puerto Rico was invaded and subsequently became a possession of the United States. The first years of the 20th century were marked by the struggle to obtain greater democratic rights from the United States. The Foraker Act of 1900, which established a civil government, and the Jones Act of 1917, which made Puerto Ricans U.S. citizens, paved the way for the drafting of Puerto Rico's Constitution and its approval by Congress and Puerto Rican voters in 1952. However, the political status of Puerto Rico, a Commonwealth controlled by the United States, remains an anomaly.


    Pre-colonial Puerto Rico

    The settlement of Puerto Rico began with the establishment of the Ortoiroid culture from the Orinoco region in South America, an Archaic Period culture of Amerindian hunters and fishermen who migrated from the South American mainland. An archeological dig at the island of Vieques in 1990 found the remains of what is believed to be an Ortoiroid man (named Puerto Ferro man) which was dated to around 2000 BC.

    The Ortoiroid were displaced by the Saladoid, a culture from the same region that arrived on the island between 430 and 250 BC.

    The Igneri, a tribe from the region of the Orinoco river in northern South America, migrated to the island between 120 and 400 AD. The Arcaico and Igneri co-existed on the island between the 4th and 10th centuries, and perhaps clashed.

    Between the seventh and 11th centuries, the Arawak are thought to have settled the island. During this time the Taíno culture developed, and by approximately 1000 AD, it had become dominant. Taíno culture has been traced to the village of Saladero at the basin of the Orinoco River in Venezuela; the Taíno migrated to Puerto Rico by crossing the Lesser Antilles.

    At the time of Columbus' arrival, an estimated 30 to 60 thousand Taíno Amerindians, led by the cacique (chief) Agüeybaná, inhabited the island. They called it Boriken, "the great land of the valiant and noble Lord". The natives lived in small villages led by a cacique and subsisted on hunting, fishing and gathering of indigenous cassava root and fruit.

    When the Spaniards arrived in 1493, the Taíno were already in conflict with the raiding Carib, who were moving up the Antilles chain. The Taíno domination of the island was nearing its end, and the Spanish arrival marked the beginning of their extinction. Their culture, however, remains part of that of contemporary Puerto Rico. Musical instruments such as maracas and güiro, the hammock, and words such as Mayagüez, Arecibo, iguana, and huracán (hurricane) are examples of the legacy left by the Taíno.

    The ancient history of the archipelago known today as Puerto Rico is not well known. Unlike other larger, more advanced indigenous communities in the New World (Aztec and Inca) whose people left behind abundant archeological and physical evidence of their societies, the indigenous population of Puerto Rico left scant artifacts and evidence. The scarce archaeological findings and early Spanish scholarly accounts from the colonial era constitute the basis of knowledge about them. The first comprehensive book on the history of Puerto Rico was written by Fray Íñigo Abbad y Lasierra in 1786, almost three centuries after the first Spaniards arrived on the island.




    Between the 7th and 11th centuries, the Taíno culture developed on the island; by approximately 1000 AD, it had become dominant. At the time of Columbus' arrival, an estimated 30,000 to 60,000 Taíno Amerindians, led by the cacique (chief) Agüeybaná, inhabited the island. They called it Boriken, meaning "the great land of the valiant and noble Lord."[26] The natives lived in small villages, each led by a cacique. They subsisted by hunting and fishing, done generally by men, as well as by the women's gathering and processing of indigenous cassava root and fruit. This lasted until Columbus arrived in 1493.[27][28]

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    22. Spanish rule (1493–1898)
    Sat May 16, 2015, 08:18 AM
    May 2015

    Christopher Columbus, the explorer credited with the discovery of Puerto Rico


    Juan Ponce de León (Santervás de Campos, Valladolid, Spain), was the first governor of Puerto Rico. His grandson Juan Ponce de Leon II was the first indigenous governor of Puerto Rico.


    On September 25, 1493, Christopher Columbus set sail on his second voyage with 17 ships and 1,200 to 1,500 men from Cádiz. On November 19, 1493 he landed on the island, naming it San Juan Bautista in honor of Saint John the Baptist.

    The first settlement, Caparra, was founded on August 8, 1508 by Juan Ponce de León, a lieutenant under Columbus, who was greeted by the Taíno Cacique Agüeybaná and who later became the first governor of the island. Ponce de Leon was actively involved in the Higuey massacre of 1503 in Puerto Rico. In 1508, Sir Ponce de Leon was chosen by the Spanish Crown to lead the conquest and exploitation of the Taíno Indians for gold mining operations.

    The following year, the settlement was abandoned in favor of a nearby islet on the coast, named Puerto Rico (Rich Port), which had a suitable harbor. In 1511, a second settlement, San Germán was established in the southwestern part of the island. According to the "500TH Florida Discovery Council Round Table", on March 3, 1513, Juan Ponce de León organized and commenced an expedition (with a crew of 200, including women and free blacks) departing from "Punta Aguada" Puerto Rico.

    Puerto Rico was the historic first gateway to the discovery of Florida, which opened the door to the settlement of the southeastern United States.

    They introduced Christianity, cattle, horses, sheep, the Spanish language and more to the land (Florida) that later became the United States of America. This settlement occurred 107 years before the Pilgrims landed.

    During the 1520s, the island took the name of Puerto Rico while the port became San Juan. The Spanish settlers established the first repartimiento system, under which natives were distributed to Spanish officials to be used as slave labor. On December 27, 1512, under pressure from the Roman Catholic Church, Ferdinand II of Aragon issued the Burgos' Laws, which modified the repartimiento into a system called encomiendas, aimed at ending the exploitation. The laws prohibited the use of any form of punishment toward the indigenous people, regulated their work hours, pay, hygiene, and care, and ordered them to be catechized.

    In 1511, the Taínos revolted against the Spanish; cacique Urayoán, as planned by Agüeybaná II, ordered his warriors to drown the Spanish soldier Diego Salcedo to determine whether the Spaniards were immortal. After drowning Salcedo, they kept watch over his body for three days to confirm his death. The revolt was easily crushed by Ponce de León and within a few decades much of the native population had been decimated by disease, violence, and a high occurrence of suicide. As a result, Taíno culture, language, and traditions were generally destroyed, and were claimed to have "vanished" 50 years after Christopher Columbus arrived. Since the early 21st century, efforts have been made to revive and rebuild Taíno culture.

    The Roman Catholic Church of chappel, realizing the opportunity to expand its influence, also participated in colonizing the island. On August 8, 1511, Pope Julius II established three dioceses in the New World, one in Puerto Rico and two on the island of Hispaniola under the archbishop of Seville. The Canon of Salamanca, Alonso Manso, was appointed bishop of the Puerto Rican diocese. On September 26, 1512, before his arrival on the island, the first school of advanced studies was established by the bishop. Taking possession in 1513, he became the first bishop to arrive in the Americas. Puerto Rico would also become the first ecclesiastical headquarters in the New World during the reign of Pope Leo X and the general headquarters of the Spanish Inquisition in the New World.

    As part of the colonization process, African slaves were brought to the island in 1513. Following the decline of the Taíno population, more slaves were brought to Puerto Rico; however, the number of slaves on the island paled in comparison to those in neighboring islands. Also, early in the colonization of Puerto Rico, attempts were made to wrest control of Puerto Rico from Spain. The Caribs, a raiding tribe of the Caribbean, attacked Spanish settlements along the banks of the Daguao and Macao rivers in 1514 and again in 1521 but each time they were easily repelled by the superior Spanish firepower. However, these would not be the last attempts at control of Puerto Rico. The European powers quickly realized the potential of the newly discovered lands and attempted to gain control of them.

    The first school in Puerto Rico and the first school in the United States after Puerto Rico became a US territory, was the Escuela de Gramatica (Grammar School). The school was established by Bishop Alonso Manso in 1513, in the area where the Cathedral of San Juan was to be constructed. The school was free of charge and the courses taught were Latin language, literature, history, science, art, philosophy and theology.

    European threats

    Sparked by the possibility of immense wealth, many European powers made attempts to wrest control of the Americas from Spain in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. Success in invasion varied, and ultimately all Spanish opponents failed to maintain permanent control of the island. In 1528, the French, recognizing the strategic value of Puerto Rico, sacked and burned the southwestern town of San Germán. They also destroyed many of the island's first settlements, including Guánica, Sotomayor, Daguao and Loíza before the local militia forced them to retreat. The only settlement that remained was the capital, San Juan. French corsairs would again sack San Germán in 1538 and 1554.

    Spain, determined to defend its possession, began the fortification of the inlet of San Juan in the early 16th century. In 1532, construction of the first fortifications began with La Fortaleza (the Fortress) near the entrance to San Juan bay. Seven years later the construction of massive defenses around San Juan began, including Fort San Felipe del Morro astride the entrance to San Juan bay. Later, Fort San Cristóbal and Fort San Jerónimo—built with a financial subsidy from the Mexican mines—garrisoned troops and defended against land attacks. In 1587, engineers Juan de Tejada and Juan Bautista Antonelli redesigned Fort San Felipe del Morro; these changes endure. Politically, Puerto Rico was reorganized in 1580 into a captaincy general to provide for more autonomy and quick administrative responses to military threats.

    On November 22, 1595, English privateer Sir Francis Drake—with 27 vessels and 2,500 troops—sailed into San Juan Bay intending to loot the city. However, they were unable to defeat the forces entrenched in the forts. Knowing Drake had failed to overcome the city's defenses by sea, on June 15, 1598, the Royal Navy, led by George Clifford, 3rd Earl of Cumberland, landed troops from 21 ships to the east in Santurce. Clifford and his men met Spanish resistance while attempting to cross the San Antonio bridge (from an area known today as Condado) into the islet of San Juan. Nonetheless, the English conquered the island and held it for several months. They were forced to abandon the island owing to an outbreak of dysentery among the troops. The following year Spain sent soldiers, cannons, and a new governor, Alonso de Mercado, to rebuild the city of San Juan.

    The 17th and 18th centuries saw more attacks on the island. On September 25, 1625, the Dutch, under the leadership of Boudewijn Hendrick (Balduino Enrico), attacked San Juan, besieging Fort San Felipe del Morro and La Fortaleza. Residents fled the city but the Spanish, led by Governor Juan de Haro, were able to repel the Dutch troops from Fort San Felipe del Morro. The fortification of San Juan continued; in 1634, Philip IV of Spain fortified Fort San Cristóbal, along with six fortresses linked by a line of sandstone walls surrounding the city. In 1702, the English assaulted the town of Arecibo, located on the north coast, west of San Juan, with no success. In 1797, the French and Spanish declared war on the United Kingdom. The British attempted again to conquer the island, attacking San Juan with an invasion force of 7,000 troops and an armada consisting of 64 warships under the command of General Ralph Abercromby. Captain General Don Ramón de Castro and his army successfully resisted the attack.

    Amidst the constant attacks, the first threads of Puerto Rican society emerged. A 1765 census conducted by Lt. General Alejandro O'Reilly showed a total population of 44,883, of which 5,037 (11.2%) were slaves, a low percentage compared to the other Spanish colonies in the Caribbean. In 1786 the first comprehensive history of Puerto Rico—Historia Geográfica, Civil y Política de Puerto Rico by Fray Iñigo Abbad y Lasierra—was published in Madrid, documenting the history of Puerto Rico from the time of Columbus' landing in 1493 until 1783. The book also presents a first hand account of Puerto Rican identity, including music, clothing, personality and nationality.

    In 1779, Puerto Ricans fought in the American Revolutionary War under the command of Bernardo de Gálvez, who was named Field Marshal of the Spanish colonial army in North America. Puerto Ricans participated in the capture of Pensacola, the capital of the British colony of West Florida and the cities of Baton Rouge, St. Louis and Mobile. The Puerto Rican troops, commanded by Brigadier General Ramón de Castro, helped defeat the British and Indian army of 2,500 soldiers and British warships in Pensacola.

    Early 19th century

    The 19th century brought many changes to Puerto Rico, both political and social. In 1809, the Spanish government, in opposition to Napoleon, was convened in Cádiz in southern Spain. While still swearing allegiance to the king, the Supreme Central Junta invited voting representatives from the colonies. Ramón Power y Giralt was nominated as the local delegate to the Cádiz Cortes. The Ley Power ("the Power Act&quot soon followed, which designated five ports for free commerce—Fajardo, Mayagüez, Aguadilla, Cabo Rojo and Ponce—and established economic reforms with the goal of developing a more efficient economy. In 1812, the Cádiz Constitution was adopted, dividing Spain and its territories into provinces, each with a local corporation or council to promote its prosperity and defend its interests; this granted Puerto Ricans conditional citizenship.

    On August 10, 1815, the Royal Decree of Grace was issued, allowing foreigners to enter Puerto Rico (including French refugees from Hispaniola), and opening the port to trade with nations other than Spain. This was the beginning of agriculture-based economic growth, with sugar, tobacco and coffee being the main products. The Decree also gave free land to anyone who swore their loyalty to the Spanish Crown and their allegiance to the Roman Catholic Church. Thousands of families from all regions of Spain (particularly Asturias, Catalonia, Majorca and Galicia), Germany, Corsica, Ireland, France, Portugal, the Canary Islands and other locations, escaping from harsh economic times in Europe and lured by the offer of free land, soon immigrated to Puerto Rico. However, these small gains in autonomy and rights were short lived. After the fall of Napoleon, absolute power returned to Spain, which revoked the Cádiz Constitution and reinstated Puerto Rico to its former condition as a colony, subject to the unrestricted power of the Spanish monarch.

    The integration of immigrants into Puerto Rican culture and other events changed Puerto Rican society. On June 25, 1835, Queen María Cristina abolished the slave trade to Spanish colonies. In 1851, Governor Juan de la Pezuela Cevallos founded the Royal Academy of Belles Letters. The academy licensed primary school teachers, formulated school methods, and held literary contests that promoted the intellectual and literary progress of the island.

    In 1858, Samuel Morse introduced wired communication to Latin America when he established a telegraph system in Puerto Rico. Morse's oldest daughter Susan Walker Morse (1821–1885), would often visit her uncle Charles Pickering Walker who owned the Hacienda Concordia in the town of Guayama. Morse, who often spent his winters at the Hacienda with his daughter and son-in-law, who lived and owned the Hacienda Henriqueta, set a two-mile telegraph line connecting his son-in-law's hacienda to their house in Arroyo. The line was inaugurated on March 1, 1859 in a ceremony flanked by the Spanish and American flags. The first lines transmitted by Morse that day in Puerto Rico were:

    "Puerto Rico, beautiful jewel! When you are linked with the other jewels of the Antilles in the necklace of the world's telegraph, yours will not shine less brilliantly in the crown of your Queen!"

    Minor slave revolts had occurred in the island during this period, However the revolt planned and organized by Marcos Xiorro in 1821, was the most important of them all. Even though the conspiracy was unsuccessful, he achieved legendary status among the slaves and is part of Puerto Rico's folklore.

    Struggle for sovereignty


    The last half of the 19th century was marked by the Puerto Rican struggle for sovereignty. A census conducted in 1860 revealed a population of 583,308. Of these, 300,406 (51.5%) were white and 282,775 (48.5%) were persons of color, the latter including people of primarily African heritage, mulattos and mestizos. The majority of the population in Puerto Rico was illiterate (83.7%) and lived in poverty, and the agricultural industry—at the time, the main source of income—was hampered by lack of road infrastructure, adequate tools and equipment, and natural disasters, including hurricanes and droughts. The economy also suffered from increasing tariffs and taxes imposed by the Spanish Crown. Furthermore, Spain had begun to exile or jail any person who called for liberal reforms.


    "The first Puerto Rican Flag" used in the unsuccessful Grito de Lares (Lares Uprising)

    On September 23, 1868, hundreds of men and women in the town of Lares—stricken by poverty and politically estranged from Spain—revolted against Spanish rule, seeking Puerto Rican independence. The Grito de Lares ("Lares Cry" or "Lares Uprising&quot was planned by a group led by Dr. Ramón Emeterio Betances, at the time exiled to the Dominican Republic, and Segundo Ruiz Belvis. Dr. Betances had founded the Comité Revolucionario de Puerto Rico (Revolutionary Committee of Puerto Rico) in January 1868. The most important figures in the uprising were Manuel Rojas, Mathias Brugman, Mariana Bracetti, Francisco Ramirez Medina and Lola Rodríguez de Tió. The uprising, although significant, was quickly controlled by Spanish authorities.

    Following the Grito de Lares revolt, political and social reforms occurred toward the end of the 19th century. On June 4, 1870, due to the efforts of Román Baldorioty de Castro, Luis Padial and Julio Vizcarrondo, the Moret Law was approved, giving freedom to slaves born after September 17, 1868 or over 60 years old; on March 22, 1873, the Spanish National Assembly officially abolished, with a few special clauses, slavery in Puerto Rico.

    In 1870, the first political organizations on the island were formed as two factions emerged. The Traditionalists, known as the Partido Liberal Conservador (Liberal Conservative Party) were led by José R. Fernández, Pablo Ubarri and Francisco Paula Acuña and advocated assimilation into the political party system of Spain. The Autonomists, known as the Partido Liberal Reformista (Liberal Reformist Party) were led by Román Baldorioty de Castro, José Julián Acosta, Nicolás Aguayo and Pedro Gerónimo Goico and advocated decentralization away from Spanish control.

    Both parties would later change their names to Partido Incondicional Español (Unconditional Spanish Party) and Partido Federal Reformista (Reformist Federal Party), respectively. In March 1887, the Partido Federal Reformista was reformed and named the Partido Autonomista Puertorriqueño (Puerto Rican Autonomist Party); it tried to create a political and legal identity for Puerto Rico while emulating Spain in all political matters. It was led by Román Baldorioty de Castro, José Celso Barbosa, Rosendo Matienzo Cintrón and Luis Muñoz Rivera.

    Leaders of "El Grito de Lares", who were in exile in New York City, joined the Puerto Rican Revolutionary Committee, founded on December 8, 1895, and continued their quest for Puerto Rican independence. In 1897, Antonio Mattei Lluberas and the local leaders of the independence movement of the town of Yauco, organized another uprising, which became known as the "Intentona de Yauco". This was the first time that the current Puerto Rican flag was unfurled in Puerto Rican soil. The local conservative political factions, which believed that such an attempt would be a threat to their struggle for autonomy, opposed such an action. Rumors of the planned event spread to the local Spanish authorities who acted swiftly and put an end to what would be the last major uprising in the island to Spanish colonial rule.

    The struggle for autonomy came close to achieving its goal on November 25, 1897, when the Carta Autonómica (Charter of Autonomy), which conceded political and administrative autonomy to the island, was approved in Spain. In the past 400-plus years, after centuries of colonial rule, Práxedes Mateo Sagasta, the Prime Minister of Spain granted the island an autonomous government on November 25, 1897 in the empire's legislative body in Cádiz, Spain, and trade was opened up with the United States and European colonies.

    The charter maintained a governor appointed by Spain, who held the power to veto any legislative decision he disagreed with, and a partially elected parliamentary structure. That same year, the Partido Autonomista Ortodoxo (Orthodox Autonomist Party), led by José Celso Barbosa and Manuel Fernández Juncos, was founded. On February 9, 1898, the new government officially began. Local legislature set its own budget and taxes. They accepted or rejected commercial treaties concluded by Spain. In February 1898, Governor General Manuel Macías inaugurated the new government of Puerto Rico under the Autonomous Charter which gave town councils complete autonomy in local matters. Subsequently, the governor had no authority to intervene in civil and political matters unless authorized to do so by the Cabinet. General elections were held in March and on July 17, 1898 Puerto Rico's autonomous government began to function, but not for long.
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    23. QE Exit Strategy, Part One: ZIRP
    Sat May 16, 2015, 08:44 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/05/exit-strategy-part-one-zirp.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29

    By Perry G. Mehrling, Professor of Economics at Barnard. Originally published at his website

    The Fed has announced plans to raise rates in the imminent future, but the market does not believe it. Why not? Conventional wisdom appears to be that the Fed will chicken out, just as it did during the so-called Taper Tantrum. The Fed has signaled its appreciation that “liftoff” will involve increased volatility, and has stated its resolve this time simply to let that volatility happen, but markets don’t believe it...I want to suggest a slightly different source of disconnect, concerning expectations about what exactly will happen in the monetary plumbing when the Fed raises rates. Case in point is the recent Credit Suisse memo, apparently the first of a series, that forecasts “a much larger RRP facility–think north of a trillion” whereas the FOMC itself “expects that it will be appropriate to reduce the capacity of the RRP facility soon after it commences policy firming”. That’s a pretty big disconnect.

    Pozsar and Sweeney (authors of the CS memo) think about the exit from ZIRP (Zero Interest Rate Policy) from the perspective of wholesale money demand, which they insist is “a structural feature of the system” and “the dominant source of funding in the US money market”. Before the crisis, that money demand was funding the shadow banking system, largely through the intermediation of repo dealer balance sheets. Now, it is funding the Fed’s balance sheet, largely through the intermediation of prime money funds and US bank balance sheets, both of which issue money-like liabilities and invest the proceeds in excess reserves held at the Fed. The big problem that now looms is that neither prime money funds nor banks want that business any more. Capital regulations have made the bank side of the business unprofitable, and looming requirements that prime money funds mark to market (so-called floating NAV rather than constant NAV) will force them out of the business as well. Where is that money demand going to go? Pozsar and Sweeney say it will go directly to the Fed, causing the swelling of the Reverse Repo Facility pari passu with the shrinking of excess reserves. The mechanism will be a shift from prime money funds and bank deposits into government-only money funds, which will absorb the flow by accumulating RRP.

    In other words, the Fed will not be able to shrink its balance sheet as part of this first stage of exit from quantitative easing. It will only be able to shift the way that balance sheet is funded–much less excess reserves held by banks, much more RRP held by government-only money funds. Nevertheless, because this shift will allow the Fed to regain control over the Fed Funds rate, it will accept that consequence. Exit from ZIRP comes before exit from QE.

    Are you with me so far?

    NO. I'VE ASKED YVES WHAT RRP IS....
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    25. RRP means Reverse RePo, is the reply
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:18 AM
    May 2015

    Still doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I fail to see any improvement.

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    24. Is Washington Coming To Its Senses? By Paul Craig Roberts
    Sat May 16, 2015, 08:51 AM
    May 2015

    IT'S DOUBTFUL...MORE LIKELY HEADING FOR THE NEAREST EMERGENCY EXIT

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41861.htm

    There is much speculation about US Secretary of State John Kerry’s rush visit to Russia in the wake of Russia’s successful Victory Day celebration on May 9. On May 11, Kerry, who was snubbing Russia on the 9th, was on his way to Russia, and Putin consented to see him on May 12. As time passes we will find out why Kerry was snubbing Putin on May 9 and 3 days later was criticizing Washington’s puppet regime in Ukraine. For what is known at this time, a possible explanation is that Washington is coming to its senses.

    If you watched the 1 hour 20 minute video of the Victory Day Parade, you are aware that the celebration sent a powerful message. Russia is a first class military power, and Russia is backed by China and India, whose soldiers marched with Russia’s in the parade. So, while the increasingly irrelevant West, absorbed in its own self-importance, snubbed
    the celebration of the victory that the Red Army gave them over Hitler, the three largest countries in the world were present united. Russia has the largest land mass, and China and India, also large land masses, have the world’s largest populations. The celebration in Moscow made it clear that Washington has failed miserably to isolate Russia. What Washington has done is to make the BRICS more unified. With the President of China sitting at the right hand of Putin, the celebration also made it completely clear even to the morons in the Obama regime that Washington is no longer the Uni-power.

    Consider now the impact on Washington’s vassal states in Europe, the crux of the American Empire. Europeans are aware that two of the most powerful military states in history did not survive their invasions of Russia. Napoleon lost the Grande Army in Russia, and Hitler lost the Wehrmacht in Russia. It has dawned on Europeans that they are being shoved into conflict with Russia in the interest of Washington’s claim to be the World Hegemon. Europeans are accustomed to obey Washington, but when it came to being forced into conflict with Russia, Europeans began to express dissent. Signs of an independent European foreign policy appeared with Merkel and Hollande’s meeting with Putin to resolve the Ukrainian crisis orchestrated by Washington.

    Faced with the failure of its policy of isolating Russia and the emergence of an independent foreign policy in Europe, Washington sent Kerry as a supplicant to Putin to work out a way to de-escalate the Ukrainian crisis. Putin being a peacemaker will permit Washington to save face. But this will not please the neoconsevatives or the military/security complex. The former are invested heavily in claims of Amerika Uber Alles, and the latter are lusting for the abundant revenues from a new cold, or hot, war.

    Obama, Kerry, and Cameron have to become magicians. They have to transition from demonizing Putin to working with him. Having failed with force against Russia, the West is now employing seduction. If Western peoples hope to escape from the Police State that Washington has imposed on the entire Western World, we must pray that Putin does not fall for the seduction. There is no world leadership in the West. There is only selfishness and hubris. Western “leadership” is exploitative. The West loots the non-West and is now turning on itself with its looting of Ireland and Greece, with Italy, Spain, and Portugal the next targets for looting. The American public itself has been looted of its jobs, career aspirations, and civil liberties. The Western model of “democratic capitalism” turns out to be neither democratic nor capitalist, but a form of fascism ruled by an oligarchy. The United States is where regime change is most badly needed.

    Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts' latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West and How America Was Lost.

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    26. The One Percenters' Tax Loopholes and Unindicted Frauds: Audacious Oligarchy
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:26 AM
    May 2015
    http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-carried-interest-tax-loophole.html


    What set this conversation going is the 'carried interest' tax loophole that allows wealthy hedge fund manager to pay much lower taxes on what is really ordinary income. There are many more egregious loopholes readily available to the tax-lawyered-up wealthy, and you probably have not even heard of, or can imagine, most of them. What interested me more about this is not so much the discussion of an obvious tax loophole, but the reactions of the participants, and the lack of self-awareness.

    Ken Langone is the epitome of what is wrong with the one percent and their distorted view of reality. And Stephanie Ruhle is their cheerleader and hagiographer. Erik Schatzker gets props for at least trying to inject some realism and balance into the discussion in the most polite way. Well, he is a Canadian after all.



    Anyone who can distill 'poor Angelo Mozilo' and 'Barney Frank did it' as the only lessons out of the carnage and suffering of the housing financial crisis with its rampant, largely unindicted fraud, brazenly committed by financial institutions and their enablers in ratings agencies, is living in an alternate universe. And unfortunately that is the case. The uber-wealthy often live in a bubble of delusion because few if any will ever tell them the truth, and if they do, they do not wish to hear it and shout them down or use their money and influence to shut them up. This is the well spring of hubris and overreach. No one wants to tell the Emperor that he is naked. No one can tell a Caligula that his horse is a poor choice for the Senate. No one wants to explain to the powerful that they have gone too far, and that the times, they are a changin'. They seem to have to get hit with reality in the face, and that is too bad for a lot of innocent bystanders.

    Langone is a walking, squawking, self-delusional example of the credibility trap in action. And he is certainly not alone. He has a lot of brothers among the uber-wealthy, and kissing cousins in the Congress and politicians in general, and throughout the media, think tanks, and universities. This is why there will not be any kind of meaningful internal reform until the people clip the wings of the moneyed interests from buying elections, and politicians, and the networks. And this should be an object lesson to any people overseas who think that the terrible consequences they have suffered endured from the exports of fraudulent paper and practices of the Anglo-Americans over the past ten years have changed. They have not. And the utterly distorted, unrepentant, and unreformed world view of the unfortunately powerful one percent is the reason. Why stop when you are winning...

    Here is a link to the interview on Bloomberg in case the embedded version is not working for you. Ken Langone On Bloomberg: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2015-05-15/ken-langone-obama-engaging-in-rich-vs-poor-in-u-s-

    This original work on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 US License

    I make every attempt to respect the rights of others. If you feel that something here has infringed your work please let me know and I will correct it immediately. It is not always easy to determine the status of material posted to the Internet with regard to fair use and public domain.
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    27. Schumer Organizes Democratic Collapse on TPP
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:41 AM
    May 2015
    http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2015/05/schumer-organizes-democratic-collapse.html

    Here's the Washington Post's headline: Schumer at Center of Democrats’ Trade Drama

    But as the article makes clear, "Schumer is at the center of Dem trade drama" is easy code for "Schumer is lead perp for Dem trade collapse." Sen. Chuck Schumer, soon-to-be Leader, got his wish, a Fast Track bill that would pass the Senate, plus a separate currency bill that "pro–billionaire-controlled trade" senators can use for ground cover. The telling quote:

    Of course, the likely outcome is the separate measures will pass out of the Senate, but the currency-related measure faces a rough road in the House and at the White House.

    Pro-trade Democrats, though, will be able to say they voted to get tough on trade even as they voted for a six-year fast-track trade bill.


    Nice job, Mr. Schumer. Notice both pieces. First, as a separate bill the currency restrictions will pass, but can be vetoed separately from Fast Track. A win for Fast Track. Also, passing the currency bill allows pro-TPP Democrats to brag about how they "tried," useful fog for the campaign trail. Again, nice job, Mr. Schumer. Now the rest of the Wash Post piece, which contains a fascinating look at the back-and-forth, and the lead architect of that back-and-forth, which will lead to Fast Track passing in the Senate. That lead architect is Chuck Schumer:

    Senate Democrats’ epic trade revolt against President Barack Obama’s fast-track bill — and the furious efforts to salvage it — had one senator at the center of it all: Charles E. Schumer.

    The New York Democrat, who has become the heir apparent to Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, found himself in an awkward position, to say the least. A provision he authored to get tough on countries that manipulate their currencies was threatening to bring down the White House’s entire trade agenda; its absence on the Senate floor was why Democrats filibustered Obama’s fast-track trade package Tuesday.

    By the end of the day Wednesday, the crisis — what White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest kept calling a “procedural snafu” — had been averted, with Schumer helping to seal the deal.

    Although the New Yorker has opposed the trade bills — he voted against fast track in committee — as the caucus’ future leader, he has to balance the anti-trade sentiment among the vast majority of Democratic senators with his loyalty to the White House and the desires of a sizable number of pro-trade Democrats, such as Sen. Patty Murray of Washington.

    In short, it’s a sign of the kind of leader Schumer will be.


    Don't forget to notice "progressive" Patty Murray's role in this. As a member of Democratic leadership, she seems to have had to choose between "following the neo-liberal leader" — in this case, Barack Obama on TPP — and standing with all other progressives in the "Democratic coalition," including every labor union. Murray is choosing to play ball with Senate leadership against progressives. Watch her carefully going forward. This looks a lot like the victory of careerism winning over principle.

    Confirmation that Schumer is playing both sides — pro-billionaire, pro-"progressive" — comes later in the article:

    Schumer all along — both in committee and at the microphones Tuesday — said his goal was not to use his currency proposal as a poison pill to kill fast track, which is why he offered it as an amendment to the separate customs bill last month.


    The main reason for the explosion of popular joy after the vote that upheld the filibuster was that poison pill. Schumer and the White House (via its late-night meeting with 10 named Democratic senators) re-energized the pro-TPP senators, restiffened their pro-TPP spines. In the end, those ten plus four others (see below) should be more than enough to defeat the next Democratic filibuster.

    - See more at: http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2015/05/schumer-organizes-democratic-collapse.html#sthash.Qojvqe7O.dpuf
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    28. So here are your 14 Democratic pro-TPP senators
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:42 AM
    May 2015

    So here are your 14 Democratic pro-TPP senators, as I see it. First, from the White House press report, "[t]he following senators attended the meeting":

    Michael Bennet (D-CO)
    Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
    Ben Cardin (D-MD)
    Tom Carper (D-DE)
    Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND)
    Tim Kaine (D-VA)
    Patty Murray (D-WA)
    Bill Nelson (D-FL)
    Mark Warner (D-VA)
    Ron Wyden (D-OR)

    Second, from The Hill:

    Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
    Claire McCaskill (D-MO)

    Finally, these two more-or-less obvious names:

    Cory Booker (D-NJ) — who declined to vote on the filibuster
    Chuck Schumer (D-NY) — who helped collapse the resistance

    With 54 Republican senators voting Yes to end a filibuster, it would be hard to uphold it when 14 anti-progressive Democrats are willing to vote with them.

    JUST IN:
    The roll-call vote for the second filibuster has been released. The filibuster was defeated 65–33 with two Republicans not voting.

    New names on the pro-TPP list: Coons (D-DE), Shaheen (D-NH). Since the Fast Track proponents had five votes to spare (threshold: 60 votes), I take both as voting as they wished. Booker and Schumer voted No, but their votes weren't needed. Since the floor vote threshold will be a simple majority, I don't expect either to have to show his hand publicly yet.

    - See more at: http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2015/05/schumer-organizes-democratic-collapse.html#sthash.Qojvqe7O.dpuf

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    29. More than 1,000 plaintiffs file lawsuit to keep Japan out of TPP
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:43 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2015/05/15/national/crime-legal/ex-minister-turns-courts-bid-keep-japan-tpp-talks/#.VVdJUFIerkr

    More than 1,000 people filed a lawsuit against the government on Friday, seeking to halt Japan’s involvement in 12-country talks on a Pacific Rim free trade agreement, which they called “unconstitutional.”

    A total of 1,063 plaintiffs, including lawmakers, claimed in the case brought to the Tokyo District Court that the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership would undermine their basic human rights under the Constitution.

    The lawsuit is led by Masahiko Yamada, 73, a lawyer who served as agriculture minister in 2010 as part of the Democratic Party of Japan government.

    “The TPP could violate the Japanese right to get stable food supply, or the right to live, guaranteed by Article 25 of the nation’s Constitution,” Yamada, who abandoned his party in 2012 over then-Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda’s push to join the TPP talks, said Thursday before the court filing.

    The envisaged pact would benefit big corporations but would jeopardize the country’s food safety and medical systems, and destroy the domestic farm sector, according to the plaintiffs.

    MORE
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    30. Consumer Confidence Plunges Below Any Economist's Estimate; Consumers Shock Economists
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:47 AM
    May 2015
    http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/05/consumer-confidence-plunges-below-any.html

    Consumer confidence is the third miss by economists in a single day. Please consider the Bloomberg Consensus Estimate for Consumer Confidence.

    image:

    Consumer confidence has fallen back noticeably this month, down more than 6 points to a much lower-than-expected 95.2. This compares very poorly with the Econoday consensus for 103.0 and is even far below the Econoday low estimate of 100.5. The weakness, ominously, is the result of falling assessments of the jobs market, both the current jobs market and expectations for the future jobs market. The second quarter, which is expected to be much stronger than the weather-depressed first quarter, isn't likely to get off to a fast start, at least as far as this report goes.

    The most striking weakness in April is the assessment of future conditions with the expectations component down 8.5 points to 87.5 for the weakest reading going all the way back to September. And the most striking weakness among the sub-components is employment, where fewer see more jobs opening up 6 months from now and more see fewer jobs available. This spills over into income where fewer see an increase ahead and more see a decrease.

    But also weak is the present situation component which is down more than 2-1/2 points to 106.8 for its weakest reading since December. Here the most closely watched sub-component is the jobs-hard-to-get reading which is up nearly 1 full percentage point to 26.4 percent. This reading will hold back expectations at least to some degree for a big bounce back in the April employment report from a very weak March.

    Inflation expectations are down sharply this month, 4 tenths lower to 4.8 percent which is one of the lowest readings of the recovery. Gas prices have been edging higher but are still low, the latter no doubt a major factor behind the latest reading.

    Buying plans are mixed with automobile and vacation plans down but not home plans which are up. But home buying won't be a featured activity for consumers if their expectations for employment are weak. Today's report, showing weakness in the jobs assessment and in inflation expectations, won't be pulling forward expectations for the Federal Reserve's first rate hike.


    Missing the Boat

    Not only was the consensus outside the range of reading predictions, economists did not even get the leading sign correct. Economists expected an improvement from 101.3 to 103.0 but instead the index plunged 7.6%.

    Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/05/consumer-confidence-plunges-below-any.html#5Oa6odUmUH7RIt9w.99
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    31. Consumers Did What They Said
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:48 AM
    May 2015


    In a huge shock to economists, consumers actually did what consumers said they would do rather than what economists models predicted.

    And economists still don't believe it. They are looking for 3% growth this year, whereas I think the US is in recession.

    Mike "Mish" Shedlock
    http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
    Read more at http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2015/05/consumer-confidence-plunges-below-any.html#5Oa6odUmUH7RIt9w.99
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    32. Court vacates $85 million award for Oregon National Guardsmen in Iraq health case
    Sat May 16, 2015, 09:51 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/05/15/us-usa-military-chemicals-idUSKBN0O004820150515

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned on Thursday a jury verdict awarding $85 million to 12 Army National Guardsmen who accused defense contractor KBR of failing to protect them from cancer-causing chemicals when they served in Iraq. An Oregon jury awarded each of the guardsmen $850,000 in noneconomic damages and another $6.25 million in punitive damages in 2012 for "reckless and outrageous indifference" to their health while they were providing security for civilian workers restoring an Iraq oil industry water plant in 2003 after the U.S.-led invasion.

    KBR has been appealing that decision for the last year, arguing the U.S. District Court in Portland did not have jurisdiction in the case. The appeals court agreed and referred it back to Oregon district court where it could be either dismissed or transferred to another court, KBR lead trial attorney Geoffrey Harrison said.

    “The court of appeals ruling is exactly what KBR asked the district court to do nearly five years ago and it is the exact result that KBR sought in this appeal, which is vacating the legally and factually incorrect judgment of the trial court in its entirety,” Harrison said.


    An attorney for the veterans, David Sugerman of Portland, said the guardsmen were disappointed but pursuing options going forward.

    "We are not about to give up," he said. "KBR has gotten out from under an $85 million verdict on a technicality."


    Harrison said it was possible the case could be moved to a Texas court where approximately 133 similar claims are being heard.

    Lawyers for the guardsmen argued in the Oregon case that the soldiers were exposed to cancer-causing chemicals and got sick after the plant was contaminated with sodium dichromate, a chemical used to fight corrosion. Sodium dichromate contains hexavalent chromium, a toxic chemical made famous in the film "Erin Brockovich."

    "They have a variety of health problems and they are as well concerned about future health issues from this carcinogen and toxin that they were contaminated by," Sugerman said. "KBR told them it was safe as long as they didn’t bathe in it, and there are a number of guys that have very serious health problems."


    KBR dismissed the soldiers’ contentions.

    “These plaintiffs were not exposed to dangerous amounts of sodium dichromate and did not suffer any damages as a result of anything KBR did or did not do,” Harrison said.


    I SUPPOSE NOBODY'S DIED YET, THEN....

    MattSh

    (3,714 posts)
    36. What’s in a Name? Political Correctness - Strategic Culture Foundation
    Sat May 16, 2015, 02:26 PM
    May 2015

    The corporate media in the West has imposed another rule on journalists that is straight out of George Orwell’s 1984 Newspeak dictionary. Place names in Ukraine that have been used by journalists, historians, novelists, and others for decades are now to be spelled according to the diktats of the Ukrainian government, its diaspora activists and lobbyists around the globe, and a class of non-governmental organization employees who are well-paid to police the Internet for «violators». Among the place names in question are the Ukrainian capital of Kiev and the western Ukrainian city of Lvov. The Ukrainians and their NGO grammar police insist that the names be spelled as «Kyiv» and «Lviv», respectively. It is inevitable that these agents of political correctness will soon descend upon restaurants around the world, as well as commercial food producers, to demand that «Chicken Kiev» be changed to «Chicken Kyiv» on menus and food packaging.

    Kiev has been and presumably always will be the correct English spelling for the Ukrainian capital. Pol Pot’s dictatorship in Cambodia may have insisted on calling the country «Kampuchea,» but it continued to be referred to as «Cambodia» in most countries. The dictator of the Ivory Coast convinced many that his country was henceforth to be known as «Côte d’Ivoire», the French name of the country. Only diplomatic protocol aficionados went along with the name change. The identical name game also transpired with «Myanmar,» which the Burmese military junta insisted was the only permissible name for the country, not Burma, which the country had been known as for years. Burma was a name that attached itself to World War II’s «Burma Road» campaign and «Burma Hump» airlift operations and even inspired a shaving cream product called «Burma Shave».

    Peking and Canton became Beijing and Guangzhou, respectively, merely because the Chinese romanized their alphabet. There was no nationalistic fervor to change place names otherwise there would be no Peking University today. The same applies to Korean, which also Romanized and thus, Pusan became Busan. However, there remains Pusan National University in South Korea. India may insist that Bombay is now Mumbai, but the Bombay Stock Exchange remains the name for the trading operation. Nor has Bombay Gin changed its name to «Mumbai Gin». Similarly, the Madras Stock Exchange and the Madras High Court just haven’t seemed to bother changing their names to «Chennai,» as the Indian government prefers to call Madras. And one of the darkest incidents in the history of British colonial rule in India remains known as the «Black Hole of Calcutta,» not Kolkata.

    Macedonia was forced to join the United Nations under the artificial name of «FYROM», or Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia», because Greece objected to the use of Macedonia, claiming it put in jeopardy its sovereignty over northern border areas, which are also known as Macedonia. For the sake of brevity and clarity, most journalists and writers refer to the country simply as Macedonia.

    Ukrainian insistence on the use of Kyiv and Lviv, instead of Kiev and Lvov, is reminiscent of the «grammar fascists» of another country, Israel. There, successive Binyamin Netanyahu-led governments have insisted that place names no longer be known by their English or Arabic names but by straight transliterations of their Hebrew names. Therefore, Jerusalem is no longer Jerusalem, as Christians have known it for over two thousand years, but «Yerushalayim». And no longer will signs and other documents in Arabic use the name «Al Quds» for the city but only the Arabic text for Yerushalayim, which is pronounced in Arabic as «Urshalim,» an entirely artificial name. Nazareth, the birthplace of Jesus, will be known only as «Natzrat» and not Nazareth or the Arabic name «Al Nasra». And Jaffa, the ancient Arab town that is famous for its Jaffa oranges, will, the Israelis insist be known only as Yafo. The Netanyahu regime insists that these changes are intended to drive home the point that Israel is a Jewish state and has no regard for its religious or ethnic minorities.

    Complete story at - http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/05/14/what-in-a-name-political-correctness.html

    MattSh

    (3,714 posts)
    37. World population-food supply balance is becoming increasingly unstable, study finds
    Sat May 16, 2015, 02:29 PM
    May 2015

    Researchers report that as the world population increases and food demand has grown, globalization of trade has made the food supply more sensitive to environmental and market fluctuations. This leads to greater chances of food crises, particularly in nations where land and water resources are scarce and therefore food security strongly relies on imports.

    The study assesses the food supply available to more than 140 nations (with populations greater than 1 million) and demonstrates that food security is becoming increasingly susceptible to perturbations in demographic growth, as humanity places increasing pressure on use of limited land and water resources.

    "In the past few decades there has been an intensification of international food trade and an increase in the number of countries that depend on food imports," said Paolo D'Odorico, a professor of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia and one of the study's authors. "On average, about one-fourth of the food we eat is available to us through international trade. This globalization of food may contribute to the spread of the effects of local shocks in food production throughout the world."

    D'Odorico's paper is published this week in the online early edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Food security, D'Odorico said, is typically defined as the availability of and access to a sufficient amount of food to meet the requirements of human societies at all places and all times.

    Complete story at - http://phys.org/news/2015-05-world-population-food-increasingly-unstable.html

    MattSh

    (3,714 posts)
    39. Going off on my own tangent for a couple of minutes...
    Sat May 16, 2015, 03:32 PM
    May 2015

    Because... Well, just because!

    Musical Interlude - Russian Sailor's Dance - From the May 9th Victory Day celebrations in Moscow.

    Fuddnik

    (8,846 posts)
    42. I would strongly recommend running out and buying the June Issue Of Harpers. Must read.
    Sat May 16, 2015, 11:49 PM
    May 2015

    I got mine in the mail today, so I don't know if it's hit the shelves yet.



    "Anyone who voted twice for Obama and was baffled twice by what followed—there must be millions of us—will feel that this president deserves a kind of criticism he has seldom received,” David Bromwich writes in this month’s cover story, “What Went Wrong.” I trust I am not revealing too much about my own political leanings when I say that Bromwich delivers on the promise of his bluntly titled essay. His analysis of President Barack Obama’s personal failings and public failures—his “peculiar avoidance of the business of politics”; his inability to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay, a decision he characterized, perhaps too candidly, as “the path of least resistance”—is overdue and essential, whether you voted for the current president twice, once, or not at all."

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    43. Why 25,000 Detroit Residents Will Soon Have Their Water Turned Off
    Sun May 17, 2015, 06:57 AM
    May 2015

    The city of Detroit may be bankrupt financially, but moral bankruptcy abounds as well as city officials began handing out notices to as many as 25,000 residents to tell them that they have ten days to pay or their taps will be turned off.

    “We want the water shut-offs to end. Period. End of story,” says DeMeeko Williams of the Detroit Water Brigade.

    Some of Detroit’s poorest citizens are losing their water in the second round of water cut-offs even though they live right next to a body of water that carry’s one-fifth of the world’s water supply.

    Child welfare authorities even moved into homes to take children from their parents in abodes that had their water cut off earlier in 2014. The cut-offs are nothing more than a demonstration of greed.

    Water rates have risen more than 119% in the last decade in Detroit, affecting primarily the poor. Every winter, aging pipes spew water into the street, and while the city ‘has no money to repair this crumbling infrastructure,’ they continue to tap the poorest for resources to pay for water.

    What’s worse – as a “cost cutting measure,” the water department stopped sending bills, expecting residents to just figure out what they owed. The department then installed “smart meters” that read backwards, causing may families to receive bills saying they owed thousands of dollars.

    Read more: http://naturalsociety.com/why-25000-detroit-residents-will-soon-have-their-water-turned-off/#ixzz3aONsDfQe

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    44. FROM JANUARY Ukraine Agrees To Monsanto Land Grab For $17 Billion IMF Loan
    Sun May 17, 2015, 06:59 AM
    May 2015
    https://www.popularresistance.org/ukraine-agrees-to-monsanto-land-grab-for-17-billion-imf-loan/

    The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) is helping biotech run the latest war in Ukraine. Make no mistake that what is happening in the Ukraine now is deeply tied to the interests of Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, and other big players in the poison food game.

    Monsanto has an office in Ukraine. While this does not shout ‘culpability’ from every corner, it is no different than the US military’s habit to place bases in places that they want to gain political control. The opening of this office coincided with land grabs with loans from the IMF and World Bank to one of the world’s most hated corporations – all in support of their biotech takeover.

    Previously, there was a ban on private sector land ownership in the country – but it was lifted ‘just in time’ for Monsanto to have its way with the Ukraine.

    In fact, a bit of political maneuvering by the IMF gave the Ukraine a $17 billion loan – but only if they would open up to biotech farming and the selling of Monsanto’s poison crops and chemicals – destroying a farmland that is one of the most pristine in all of Europe. Farm equipment dealer, Deere, along with seed producers Dupont and Monsanto, will have a heyday.

    In the guise of ‘aid,’ a claim has been made on Ukraine’s vast agricultural riches. It is the world’s third largest exporter of corn and fifth largest exporter of wheat. Ukraine has deep, rich, black soil that can grow almost anything, and its ability to produce high volumes of GM grain is what made biotech come rushing to take it over....
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    45. FROM FEBRUARY US to allow armed drone exports
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:13 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31523207

    The US has announced it will begin allowing sales of armed drones to some friendly and allied countries.

    Only the UK has been allowed to purchase armed unmanned aircraft. Other countries have unarmed craft.

    Countries purchasing drones must sign agreements they will only be used for military campaigns and the US will review how the country is complying.

    The change comes amid China exporting drones from its own unmanned programme to at least nine countries....
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    46. Senate Democrats Work w/GOP Throw Medicare Under Bus as Part of TPP Fast Track Sausage-Making
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:22 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/05/senate-democrats-work-with-republicans-throw-medicare-under-the-bus-part-tpp-fast-track-sausage-making.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+NakedCapitalism+%28naked+capitalism%29

    I got an email blast on Medicare and TPP from Democracy for America, so I immediately discounted it because DFA, and besides, there wasn’t any linky goodness, but then I thought “This could be really bad,” so I looked into it. Here’s the paragraph in question from DFA:

    There’s a big — brand new — attack on Medicare that’s just been added in the Senate to the Fast Track bill for the TPP. The bill would cut a whopping $700 million from Medicare, hurting seniors who need access to health care.

    That’s right, Republicans insisted on cutting Medicare spending to pay for a Trade Adjustment Assistance program that Democrats got added to the bill in order to support workers who lost their jobs due to trade deals like the TPP.


    This would be execrable sausage-making for both Democrats and Republicans. For Democrats, Medicare is one of the remaining reasons to think they’re committed to social insurance; and for Republicans, their base — remember “Keep your government hands off my Medicare”? — skews old. So my questions are:


      1) Has Trade Adjustment Assistance been added to the TPP Fast Track bill?

      2) Has $700 million been cut from Medicare as a result?

      3) Does Trade Adjustment Assistance serve any public purpose?


    Has Trade Adjustment Assistance been added to the TPP Fast Track bill? In a word, no. The Trade Adjustment Assistance Act (TAA) and the Trade Promotion Authority (“Fast Track”) are separate pieces of legislation, so when DFA says that TAA has “just been added in the Senate to the Fast Track bill for the TPP,” that’s not correct. Still, that doesn’t mean that a deal wasn’t cut, and that seems to be just what’s happened. National Journal:

    The Trade Adjustment Assistance reauthorization bill hasn’t received as much attention as the fast-track trade authority bill, but Democrats see it as a priority: The program helps workers who have been put out of a job because of foreign trade with job-training and placement as well as health-insurance costs. The House and Senate are expected to move the bill in tandem with the fast-track trade measure, said an aide to Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden, who hashed out the trade deal with Sen. Orrin Hatch and Rep. Paul Ryan, both Republicans.


    And the bills indeed moved in tandem; the Senate voted for closure of both Fast Track and TAA last Thursday, May 14.

    Has $700 million been cut from Medicare as a result?
    Because that’s a lot of money, even today.[1] In a word, yes.[2] Modern Health Care:

    The Trade Adjustment Assistance Act, sponsored by Rep. David Reichert (R-Wash.), would rely on $700 million in reduced Medicare spending in 2024 to pay for [sic] healthcare coverage and other benefits for workers who lose coverage because of any agreements negotiated under fast-track trade authority sought by President Barack Obama.

    The $700 million in savings would be achieved by increasing Medicare cuts that were part of the sequester by 0.25% in 2024.


    Or in more colorful language:

    “Apparently using Medicare as a piggy bank to pay for [sic] everything under the sun has become the new legislative norm for Congress,” Max Richtman, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare, said in a statement to National Journal. “Rather than balancing priorities or considering a penny of new revenue, congressional leaders are proposing to once again funnel Medicare resources into unrelated programs and fixes—this time it’s the trade adjustment assistance program.”


    Or in dry lawyerly language:

    The full House and Senate have not yet approved the bills, but it suggests that lawmakers are getting increasingly comfortable with using future Medicare sequestration to fund Medicare and non-Medicare programs.


    So, Congress is preparing to loot Medicare not just for this one program, TAA, but as standard operating procedure. I think that qualifies as “throwing Medicare under the bus.”

    Does Trade Adjustment Assistance serve any public purpose?


    Senator Sherrod Brown — who’s done good work on TPP — describes[3] the four-decade-old TAA as follows on his site:

    Administered by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), TAA is a federal program that identifies workers who lose their jobs or have their hours or wages reduced as a result of increased imports, and helps them prepare for new careers. The program extends benefits including training for employment in another job or career, income support, job search allowances, and relocation allowances. Qualified workers may quickly return to work through a combination of these services. DOL estimates that since 1975, two million workers nationwide have relied on TAA to make ends meet and receive training necessary to find a new job. Brown released a county-by-county list of Ohio companies affected by foreign trade whose workers used TAA benefits to help train for new jobs.


    And reading on, Brown lists a ton of reasonable seeming tweaks and enhancements. Reading through the list, though, I’ve got to say I’m both ticked off and skeptical: Ticked off, because how come the millions who got kicked out of the labor force when the powers-that-be decided to downsize it aren’t eligible for the same treatment? For example, it sounds like the Health Care Tax Credit workers screwed over by trade deals get is a better deal (at least in terms of dollars, even though it’s a tax credit) than COBRA, which is what workers screwed over by recessions and depressions get. What a horrible patchwork. And skeptical, because in today’s post-crash and crapified labor market, is training really the answer?[4] Especially for over-50s? So I’m not convinced that TPP + TAA nets out positive for workers, or even makes them whole. Wikipedia (sorry) has a summary of program effects with reasonable sources; one of them is a study done by Kara M. Reynolds and John S. Palatucci[5] of American University:

    Reynolds and Palatucci compared the employment and salary trajectories of TAA beneficiaries with those of workers laid off in similar circumstances who weren’t eligible for the program. In 2007, approximately 150,000 Americans received a total of $850 million of TAA aid in the form of income support, health insurance, job search assistance, relocation compensation, and retraining. The 2009 stimulus expanded the program’s roster and benefits.

    After controlling for geography and other factors, the authors found that TAA beneficiaries fared no better at getting new jobs than those who didn’t participate in the program. Furthermore, the TAA beneficiaries who did find jobs earned roughly 30 percent less than they did in their previous positions, while the other workers typically earned 18 percent less. (This disparity owes much to the fact that the TAA program targets workers who are most in need of help.)

    There is a silver lining: Workers who participated in the voluntary training component of the program increased their likelihood of finding a job by 10 to 12 percentage points over those who did not. Their wages were also higher than those of beneficiaries who didn’t undergo training. Even these brighter numbers, however, did not make the TAA cohort more successful than the other group.

    Oh well. That’s not a very good result for a program that’s been around for 40 years, eh?

    Bottom line is that TAA is a bandaid on a cancer, and the Democrats — assuming good faith, which I think with Sherrod Brown it’s fair to do — traded away something for nothing, as so often. If corporations can go to a rigged court and sue for lost profits, how come workers can’t go to a rigged court and sue for lost wages?

    Summary

    TPP is a bad bill, made worse — let me go all tendentious, here — by stealing money from sick old people to pay for it.

    * * *

    Is there anything more I can do to oppose the TPP?

    Why, yes! Besides drawing attention to another rotten policy outcome from bipartisanship, I wanted to write this post to introduce one more method of bringing pressure to bear on your congress critters — besides letters to the editor, letters to your congress critter, faxes, phonecalls, and email to your congresscritter, as well as signing petitions and so forth — and that’s putting together a group delegation to visit their office in your district. The difficulty of the method chosen correlates to its effectiveness, which is why a personal, physical letter ranks high, and clicking an online petition ranks low. Getting a group together, and travel, are both reasonably difficult, and so the group delegation ranks high.

    Make a reservation beforehand, and I think you’ll be surprised at how well the staffers receive you. I would recommend that the group span the political spectrum, left and right, making it much harder for political operatives to dismiss you as crazies. Arguments against TPP that I think left and right share:

    1) The ISDS system is a surrender of national sovereignty to transnational tribunals;

    2) Fast Track is a surrender of legislative authority to the executive;

    3) The American people should be able to read the complete text of the bill immediately.

    And of course, the point of this post: I don’t think left or right wants Medicare cut. Outside of the political class, that is.

    I know that left and right have a boatload of issues they do not agree on, but how about we put those aside for now, and then duke it out when we’ve stopped TPP? Personally, I’d never carry a “Don’t Tread on Me” banner, but there’s no denying those banners were there when the latest landfill was stopped, and the East-West Corridor put on hold, hopefully permanently, and I’m thankful for that.

    Also, after your visit, follow though with a letter to the editor — or, if you’re really wired, an Op-Ed in your local paper — describing the position your Congress critter took, for good or ill. That will let them know they’re being watched, and letters to the editor are high impact, again because of degree of difficulty; op-eds even more so.

    Regardless of the outcome, I urge that forms of civic engagement like this are valuable in and of themselves. Think of putting together your delegation as exercising your democratic muscles. Because we need that strength, and will need more of it.

    Notes

    [1] To be fair, Medicare has problems, starting with a neo-liberal infestation presenting the usual symptoms of needless complexity and fees every time you turn around, with privatization as the end game. And then there’s unneeded care, and a general sense that our health care system isn’t one that it makes sense to enter with a trusting or joyful heart. That said, I have a hard time with policy makers who’s first thought is always cuts, and the devil take the hindmost.

    [2] In the headline, I say “cut from Medicare as a result” rather than “cut from Medicare to pay for the program” to avoid the “pay for” locution, which implies that Federal taxes “pay for” Federal spending.

    [3] Kudos to Brown for using mapping software; truly, we live in a golden age of data visualization.

    [4] I mean, except for the Democratic-leaning Non-Profit Industrial Complex of trainers, marketers, managers, counsellors, website designers, help desks, and consultants for which programs like TAA provide walking around money.

    [5] So far as I can tell, Reynolds and Palatucci are not conservative apparatchiks, though they’re cited by some on the right. I’m not an expert in this field, so if there are better studies, please give them in comments.
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    47. Don’t Be So Sure the Economy Will Return to Normal
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:27 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/17/upshot/dont-be-so-sure-the-economy-will-return-to-normal.html?hpw&rref=upshot&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well&abt=0002&abg=1

    ... Borrowing a phrase from the University of Toronto economist Richard Florida, it’s possible that we are experiencing a “Great Reset.”

    Let’s consider an analogy to see how this might work in practice.

    Well before the recent recession, many colleges and universities realized that they could not afford so many full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty members, and they began to increase their reliance on lower-paid adjuncts. Few institutions fired large numbers of full-timers suddenly, because that could have left them understaffed if trends reversed. Longstanding protections of tenure were also a constraint. Instead, many administrators added modestly to the number of adjunct faculty members, sometimes over decades, relying on retirement and attrition to manage the shift in a relatively smooth manner.

    That evolution reflects a more general principle: Institutional rigidities don’t permit adjustments to occur all at once, but by studying continuing changes we may be able to peer around a corner and see where a sector is headed.

    Such processes are scary because we may be watching the slow unfolding of a hand that, in its fundamentals, has already been dealt.

    There are signs that a comparable story may apply to the American economy more broadly....


    LESS A RESET THAN A COUNTER-REVOLUTION
     

    magical thyme

    (14,881 posts)
    60. that's essentially what they're doing at the call center I just left
    Sun May 17, 2015, 01:15 PM
    May 2015

    replacing higher paid employees with temps that get $5-7 less/hour than the fulltimers. They hire the temps for short term "proxy" projects, dangle the next project in front of them. After a year or so of culling the temps, they offer them full time employment. Simultaneously, they have been running witch hunts on targeted employees to try to drive them out so they won't have to pay unemployment. The non-targeted "favored" employees don't seem to realize that once the targets are gone, they'll just pick new targets.

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    48. Wall Street Just Got More Pessimistic About the U.S. Economy. Will the Fed Follow Suit?
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:29 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-15/wall-street-just-got-more-pessimistic-about-the-u-s-economy-will-the-fed-follow-suit-

    VIDEO BLATHER AT LINK

    Federal Reserve officials will probably cut their forecasts for economic growth when they gather again next month, though not enough to deter their intent to raise interest rates later this year.

    The median respondent to a survey of 79 economists conducted by Bloomberg from May 8 to May 13 said U.S. gross domestic product would grow 2.3 percent in the final quarter of 2015 from a year earlier, down from the 2.7 percent median estimate in April.

    That compares with a 2.5 percent midpoint of the central tendency of estimates submitted by Fed officials at their March meeting, the last time they issued updated forecasts. The central tendency denotes the range of estimates excluding the three highest and three lowest of the 17 policy makers' projections....

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    49. University Quake Scientists Dismissed: Dean's E-Mail
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:31 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-15/oil-tycoon-harold-hamm-wanted-scientists-dismissed-dean-s-e-mail-says


    The billionaire CEO of Continental Resources told a dean at the University of Oklahoma that he wanted earthquake researchers dismissed...Oil tycoon Harold Hamm told a University of Oklahoma dean last year that he wanted certain scientists there dismissed who were studying links between oil and gas activity and the state's nearly 400-fold increase in earthquakes, according to the dean's e-mail recounting the conversation.

    Hamm, the billionaire founder and chief executive officer of Oklahoma City-based Continental Resources, is a major donor to the university, which is the home of the Oklahoma Geological Survey. He has vigorously disputed the notion that he tried to pressure the survey's scientists. "I'm very approachable, and don't think I'm intimidating," Hamm was quoted as saying in an interview with EnergyWire, an industry publication, that was published on May 11. "I don't try to push anybody around."

    Yet an e-mail obtained from the university by Bloomberg News via a public records request says Hamm used a blunt approach during a 90-minute meeting last year with the dean whose department includes the geological survey.

    "Mr. Hamm is very upset at some of the earthquake reporting to the point that he would like to see select OGS staff dismissed," wrote Larry Grillot, the dean of the university's Mewbourne College of Earth and Energy, in a July 16, 2014, e-mail to colleagues at the university. Hamm also expressed an interest in joining a search committee charged with finding a new director for the geological survey, according to Grillot's e-mail. And, the dean wrote, Hamm indicated that he would be "visiting with Governor [Mary] Fallin on the topic of moving the OGS out of the University of Oklahoma."

    MR. HAMM IS A PIG, IN OTHER WORDS....
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    50. Kansas could lose millions for limiting welfare recipients to $25 at ATMs
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:40 AM
    May 2015

    A first-of-its-kind provision that prevents welfare recipients in Kansas from withdrawing more than $25 a day from an ATM might violate federal law, and could jeopardize the state’s federal funding if not amended.

    The Social Security Act requires states to ensure that recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, or TANF, “have adequate access to their cash assistance” and can withdraw money “with minimal fees or charges.”

    At stake is about $102 million in TANF block grant funds that Kansas receives every year from the federal government.

    The state’s controversial ATM limit was added as an amendment to a welfare overhaul bill signed in April by Gov. Sam Brownback, a Republican. The new law also bars welfare recipients from spending their benefit money at certain places, including movie theaters, massage parlors, cruise ships and swimming pools. It also sets stricter eligibility requirements and shortened the amount of time people can receive assistance.

    Brownback said in an interview on Friday that he is aware of the possible conflict with federal statutes and that the affected state agencies in his administration are working to fix it...

    Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/05/17/266888/kansas-could-lose-millions-for.html#storylink=cpy

    WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH KANSAS? THEY ALL LEFT FOR OZ!

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    51. MEANWHILE...Silicon Valley Is Letting Go of Its Techie Island Fantasies
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:42 AM
    May 2015


    The Seasteading Institute was the toast of tech entrepreneurs when it received financial backing from venture capitalist Peter Thiel in 2008. Its mission was to build a manmade island nation where inventors could work free of heavy-handed government interference. One early rendering shows an island raised on concrete stilts in eerily calm waters. The buildings atop the platform resemble nothing so much as the swanky tech campus of an entrepreneur’s ultimate dream: No sign of land or civilization in sight. The island, despite appearing strapped for square footage, has room for a full-size swimming pool with deck lounges.

    In a 2009 essay, Thiel described these island paradises as a potential “escape from politics in all its forms.” It wasn’t just desirable, he said. It seemed possible. “We may have reached the stage at which it is economically feasible, or where it will soon be feasible,” he wrote.

    More than a half-decade later, the dream has yet to be realized. And optimism is starting to waver. Earlier this year, during a talk at George Mason University, Thiel said, “I’m not exactly sure that I’m going to succeed in building a libertarian utopia any time soon.” Part of the problem: A truly self-sufficient society might exceed the range even of Thiel’s fortune. “You need to have a version where you could get started with a budget of less than $50 billion,” he said....

    http://www.wired.com/2015/05/silicon-valley-letting-go-techie-island-fantasies/
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    52. Ukraine says creditors must accept debt proposals BEGINNNING TO SWEAT
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:46 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/05/15/ukraine-crisis-creditors-yatseniuk-idUSL5N0Y62YY20150515

    Foreign creditors must agree to the "legitimate" deal offered by Ukraine in talks on restructuring some $23 billion worth of its debt, Prime Minister Arseny Yatseniuk said on Friday. Negotiations turned sour this week after a group of Ukraine's largest bondholders repeated objections to any writedown of the principal owed, while the Finance Ministry accused creditors of being unwilling to negotiate in good faith. Speaking to parliament on Friday, Yatseniuk said that bondholders should appreciate the parlous state of Ukraine's finances.

    "The country is at war. We have lost 20 percent of our economy. We approached creditors with a clear position on the procedure and terms of restructuring," he said.

    "We ask, appeal and insist that external creditors appreciate the current situation and accept Ukraine's offer, which is legitimate and a way to help Ukraine."


    The deal put forward by Kiev foresees extending the maturity of the bonds and reducing the principal and the coupon - a "haircut."

    "It requires all three ... it's important our creditors understand," Finance Minister Natalia Yaresko told the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development on the sidelines of its annual meeting in Tbilisi on Friday.


    The creditor committee said on Tuesday it had submitted new, detailed restructuring proposals, but the plan still rejects any haircut. The committee includes investment firm Franklin Templeton and represents investors holding about $10 billion worth of bonds.

    Ukraine is under pressure to reach a deal. The International Monetary Fund says it wants an agreement in place before it concludes its latest review of Ukraine's $17.5 billion bailout programme, which is slated to go to the IMF board in June. A second tranche of about $2.5 billion hinges on the outcome of the IMF review. Ukraine sorely needs the cash to shore up its foreign currency reserves. Concluding restructuring talks by June was always considered optimistic, but the divisions that emerged this week further undermine prospects for a quick deal. Ukraine has accused bondholders of not being constructive, while the bondholder committee said neither Kiev nor its advisers had shown substantive engagement with its initial plans, delivered four weeks ago.

    "I ask them (bondholders) to be constructive, to come to the table in a transparent fashion, to come in a responsive fashion and in good faith. We need to talk, we need to talk face to face and we need to do that in the very near future," Yaresko said.
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    53. Ukraine economy shrinks 17.6 percent in Q1 as government struggles to cope with conflict
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:47 AM
    May 2015
    http://www.usnews.com/news/business/articles/2015/05/15/ukraines-economy-contracts-176-pct-as-conflict-takes-toll

    ...The State Statistics Agency said Friday that the rate of economic slowdown worsened in every quarter last year.

    Eastern Ukraine, where many major industries and coalmines are located, has been the stage of bitter fighting between government and separatist forces since last April.

    The bloodshed has sparked the flight of 1.5 million people and left more than 7,000 people dead.

    This year's budget is predicated on an anticipated 5.5 percent drop in the size of the economy. Inflation is seen hitting at least 26.7 percent, although many economists believe it will be higher.
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    54. Questions Raised Over Poroshenko's Role In Valuable Kyiv Land Deal
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:48 AM
    May 2015

    An investigation by RFE/RL shows that Ukrainian leader Petro Poroshenko may have used his presidential influence to shut down investigations into damage of a protected historic site caused by unauthorized construction on his private property in central Kyiv.

    Two reports broadcast on RFE/RL's Ukrainian-language television program, Schemes, reveal that over the course of seven years, Poroshenko quietly a plot of protected land in Kyiv's elite Pechera district and recently quashed an inquiry into the damage of an 18th-century structure caused by construction work on his plot.

    The revelations come as Poroshenko, soon to mark his first year in office, faces growing criticism for failing to divest his billion-dollar business holdings and diminish the political influence of Ukrainian oligarchs like Dmytro Firtash, who last week claimed he personally orchestrated Poroshenko's rise to the presidency.

    Supporters of Poroshenko -- still one of Ukraine's richest men, with an estimated fortune of $750 million -- defend him as a "president of de-oligarchization." But his failure to honor his campaign pledge to divest himself of his assets, as well as new findings about his property holdings, may add to questions about his commitment to separating politics from property and money....

    http://www.rferl.org/content/ukraine-poroshenko-land-deal-questions-tsars-village/27013945.html

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    55. Vladimir Putin calls Ukraine fascist and country’s new law helps make his case
    Sun May 17, 2015, 07:49 AM
    May 2015
    http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/05/14/putin-ties-ukraines-government-to-neo-nazis-a-new-law-seems-to-back-him-up/

    As Ukraine continues its battle against separatists, corruption and a collapsing economy, it has taken a dangerous step that could further tear the country apart: Ukraine’s parliament, the Supreme Rada, passed a draft law last month honoring organizations involved in mass ethnic cleansing during World War Two.

    The draft law — which is now on President Petro Poroshenko’s desk awaiting his signature — recognizes a series of Ukrainian political and military organizations as “fighters for Ukrainian independence in the 20th century” and bans the criticism of these groups and their members. (The bill doesn’t state the penalty for doing so.) Two of the groups honored — the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) — helped the Nazis carry out the Holocaust while also killing close to 100,000 Polish civilians during World War Two.

    The law is part of a recent trend of contemporary Ukrainian nationalism promoted by those on the extreme right to break with the country’s Communist past and emphasize Ukraine’s suffering under the Soviet regime. In addition to the moral problem of forbidding the criticism of Holocaust perpetrators, the law hinders Ukraine’s European ambitions — and validates Russian President Vladimir Putin’s claims that the country is overrun by neo-Nazis.

    The OUN was founded in 1929 as a revolutionary organization designed to liberate Ukraine from Soviet rule and create an independent Ukrainian state. Many OUN leaders were trained in Nazi Germany, and the group’s philosophy was influenced by Nazi racial theorists such as Alfred Rosenberg. OUN literature, for example, declared the need to “combat Jews as supporters of the Muscovite-Bolshevik regime… Death to the Muscovite-Jewish commune! Beat the commune, save Ukraine!”

    MORE
     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    56. The weather is unsettled...damp and warm and cloudy
    Sun May 17, 2015, 08:35 AM
    May 2015

    and so am I. Didn't do Puerto Rico justice, either...I will continue next weekend on our anomalous island territory.

    Have a good week...don't let the bastards grind you down!

     

    Demeter

    (85,373 posts)
    59. Germany to Ban Paper Money and Dry out the Drugs Market
    Sun May 17, 2015, 12:40 PM
    May 2015
    https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/germany-ban-paper-money-dry-drugs-market/

    Germany might be the next country to take definitive steps towards the removal of hard currency. The economist Peter Bofinger has been campaigning for the abolition of cash in Germany. His primary merits for the removal of hard currency apparently targets the markets for undeclared work, those earning a little cash in hand and wanting to avoid declaring this and being taxed. And allegedly Bofingers proposals would dry out the drugs market. This is assuming that people trading in illicit markets would simply not choose something else to use for barter. LIKE BITCOIN?

    A couple of dangerous assumptions from Bofinger that seems to be present in those declaring a cashless society is the belief that the banking sector has fully penetrated the human world. Meaning that nothing would be possible without a bank account, mortgages, getting a job, paying staff, starting a business, etc.

    Another missing ingredient that proponents of exclusive banking cashless societies seem to ignore happily is the international trade. Already international trade is mostly exclusive to those who have suitable bank accounts that allow them to trade and exchange various currencies. Admittedly there are likely people who conduct international trade with hard currency, however with border controls it can be quite tricky to do any sizable trade, unless of course it is illicit trade. Already in our ‘global’ society there are swathes of people who face exclusion from the trading markets by being excluded from banks. Many local traders in small countries continue to trade via hard their local hard currency. These individuals and businesses would be faced with acquiring a bank account (and their relative fees), if they can not get a bank account for whatever reason, then tough luck.

    Not only would a pure banking society create an exclusive internal economy and exclude themselves in parts from the international market, it would also make it far easier for central banks to enforce their monetary policy...Print more money to solve the problem of printing too much money seems to be the chant of the contemporary day. But let us not forget the other plays being made alongside this push for a cashless society, that of negative interest rates. Calling on the Federal (Germany) government to promote cashless societies at the international level, Bofinger echoes the US and recently Denmark. Are the chances of achieving a cashless society, or rather, a purely bankers-controlled society, have the possibility of becoming a reality? If they can push TTIP through, then probably yes. Governments would become even more under control from banks and if you think you’ve seen inflation now, just waiting until they have everything in their grasp.

    Thankfully there is an escape route.

    Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Economy»Weekend Economists Visit ...