Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"Oooh! Obama Science Advisor Slams Climate Action!" Yes, It's Another Lomborg Piece Of Shit
EDIT
But in a new book, Unsettled: What Climate Science Tells Us, What it Doesnt and Why it Matters, the architect of the red team/blue team idea has resurrected it in a new form. The book, by physicist Steven Koonin, a former chief scientist at BP who did a two-year stint in the Obama Administration, already has won praise from anti-climate-action bloggers, columnists and The Wall Street Journal. Any reader would benefit from its deft, lucid tour of climate science, the best Ive seen, wrote Journal columnist Holman W. Jenkins Jr. about the book, which is scheduled for publication Tuesday. In Unsettled, Koonin describes himself as a scientist who focused on alternative energyfirst at BP, and later, as part of President Barack Obamas teambut who began to have doubts about climate science after leaving the Obama administration. Beginning in 2013, when Koonin was selected to lead the American Physical Societys review of its statement on climate change, Koonin writes, he became not only surprised, but shaken by the realization that climate science was far less mature than I had supposed.
EDIT
Scientists who have spent their careers studying climate science said that Koonins critiques are superficial, misleading and marred by overgeneralization. The science at the core of Unsettled is fatally out of date, they say, and is based on the 2013 physical science report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Since then, climate scientists have continued to learn more about the intensity and potentially catastrophic disruption of a warming climate. And while a decade ago, the effects of climate change still seemed a future threat, its impactssea level rise; shrinking glaciers; more extreme and frequent storms; drought and wildfirealready are being felt around the world.
EDIT
The bottom line is that despite uncertainties in the magnitude and patterns of natural climate variability, human-caused climate change fingerprints have been identified in pretty much every aspect of climate change scientists have looked at, said Benjamin Santer, an atmospheric scientist and leading climate modeler at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Climate scientists also noted that Koonin, a theoretical physicist, was skeptical of consensus climate science long before the American Physical Society review. What he does is he just takes potshots, said Don Wuebbles, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Illinois, who has helped lead the National Climate Assessment, which Koonins book criticizes roundly. He pulls one figure out of context, and then makes a whole chapter on it.
EDIT
Koonin, who did not respond to a request for an interview, writes that his book is an effort to increase understanding of scientific uncertainties at a time when the government is making trillion-dollar decisions about reducing human influences on the climate. The impact of human influences on the climate is too uncertain (and very likely too small) compared to the daunting amount of change required to actually achieve the goal of eliminating net global emissions by, say, 2075, Koonin writes. (The net-zero target of many of the largest of the 197 nations that have signed the Paris climate agreement, including the United States, is 2050.)
EDIT
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/04052021/a-new-book-feeds-climate-doubters-but-scientists-say-the-conclusions-are-misleading-and-out-of-date/
-misanthroptimist
(810 posts)...rarely, if ever, note the fact that uncertainty runs in both directions. Things can be worse than projected. If I had to bet, I'd lay my money down on things being worse rather than better.