Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"An Extraordinary Torrent Of Nonsense" On "Effectively Infinite" Oil & Gas
EDIT
The example Im thinking of right now is Lord Browne, formerly the chairman of British Petroleum and now a major player in the fracking industry. A few days ago, in a public appearance, he insisted that the United States would be able to stop importing foreign oil by 2030, because the supply of shale gas that would be made available to the US by fracking technology was, and I quote, effectively infinite. Ahem.
I found myself wondering if Lord Browne might possibly have been one of the contestants in the Monty Python Upper Class Twit Of The Year Contest skit which, in a nice bit of synchronicity, a reader forwarded to me right about the time that his lordship was making a very public fool of himself. Browne has been employed for some time in the oil industry, and therefore has had every opportunity to find out that the word "infinite" does not belong in any meaningful statement about fossil fuels. Now of course he may simply have been engaged in the same sort of puffery that we saw not too long ago from mortgage brokers and real estate agents, who had pressing financial reasons to spend much of their time expressing equally expansive and equally inaccurate notions of where their market was headed. Still, I suspect theres more going on than this.
Over the last six months or so an extraordinary torrent of nonsense about limitless gas and oil supplies has been sloshing through the media, spouting out from an equally extraordinary assortment of people who ought to know better. Weve seen pundits loudly claiming that the United States had become a net petroleum exporter, when what was going on was that modest amounts of gasoline and other refined petroleum products that Americans are too poor to afford nowadays are being sold to more prosperous countries abroad. Weve seen fracking technology, which the oil industry has been using for decades, waved around as a brand new technological breakthrough; weve seen the Bakken shale, which has been known since the 1970s and doesnt actually have that much accessible oil in it, ballyhooed as a brand new game-changing discovery; weve seen the most blatant falsehoods proclaimed as factIm thinking here of the pundit I critiqued in a previous post, who insisted that kerogen shales are exactly the same as whats being drilled in the Bakken, and that the US therefore has some absurd amount of shale oil ready for pumping.
Over the last few weeks, a number of my fellow peak oil writers have expressed worries about this outpouring of counterfactual drivel. Myself, I find it a very hopeful sign. What we are seeing is the shattering of the consensus that has excluded any discussion of peak oil from the collective conversation of our time. Plenty of pundits who refused to talk about peak oil at all are now talking about it incessantly. Even though theyre screeching at the top of their lungs that it cant happen, and scrabbling around for any argument, however feeble or blatantly false, they can use to back up that proposition, theyre still talking about it.
EDIT
http://www.energybulletin.net/stories/2012-07-19/far-side-denial