Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Is a High Renewables Future Really Possible?
(Part 1)
<snip>
Skeptics often point to a number of familiar criticisms: that high penetrations of renewables are not possible; that such a future requires major technological innovation; that it requires unreasonable amounts of energy storage to balance variable wind and solar; that it requires massive build-out of transmission infrastructure, biomass generation capacity, large-scale hydro, or all of the above; that it requires major investment that simply isn’t there; that it is uncompetitively costly (at least without large subsidies); that variable renewables will undermine the reliability of grid power.
Couple such skepticism with IEA’s recent report noting that renewables have yet to make a serious dent in the carbon intensity of the global energy system—on which fossil fuels seem to have a strangle hold—and it’d be easy to side with the skeptics, but they are wrong.
Renewables’ track record shows that they continue to outpace skeptics’ expectations. “People thought that maybe renewables would get to two percent. When they did that, people said maybe five percent. Then 10 percent,” says Hutch Hutchinson, managing director at RMI. “Renewables have been fighting and scratching the entire way. Now, there’s good analytical evidence that with some creativity and customary levels of reinvestment in our energy system, we can get to a high renewables future.”
Eric Martinot, author of REN21’s Renewables Global Futures Report 2013, said something strikingly similar during a recent visit to RMI’s offices. He noted that the World Bank and others typically have a view of renewables that’s either behind the times by a decade (their image of 2013 is what renewables actually looked like in 2003) or low by a factor of ten (they think there’s much less renewable capacity than there really is).
But if we look to a growing body of consensus among energy futures studies and to an increasing number of examples from around the world today, we’ll see that a high renewables future is both possible and capable of coming soon. Indeed, in some places it’s already here....
<snip>
Skeptics often point to a number of familiar criticisms: that high penetrations of renewables are not possible; that such a future requires major technological innovation; that it requires unreasonable amounts of energy storage to balance variable wind and solar; that it requires massive build-out of transmission infrastructure, biomass generation capacity, large-scale hydro, or all of the above; that it requires major investment that simply isn’t there; that it is uncompetitively costly (at least without large subsidies); that variable renewables will undermine the reliability of grid power.
Couple such skepticism with IEA’s recent report noting that renewables have yet to make a serious dent in the carbon intensity of the global energy system—on which fossil fuels seem to have a strangle hold—and it’d be easy to side with the skeptics, but they are wrong.
Renewables’ track record shows that they continue to outpace skeptics’ expectations. “People thought that maybe renewables would get to two percent. When they did that, people said maybe five percent. Then 10 percent,” says Hutch Hutchinson, managing director at RMI. “Renewables have been fighting and scratching the entire way. Now, there’s good analytical evidence that with some creativity and customary levels of reinvestment in our energy system, we can get to a high renewables future.”
Eric Martinot, author of REN21’s Renewables Global Futures Report 2013, said something strikingly similar during a recent visit to RMI’s offices. He noted that the World Bank and others typically have a view of renewables that’s either behind the times by a decade (their image of 2013 is what renewables actually looked like in 2003) or low by a factor of ten (they think there’s much less renewable capacity than there really is).
But if we look to a growing body of consensus among energy futures studies and to an increasing number of examples from around the world today, we’ll see that a high renewables future is both possible and capable of coming soon. Indeed, in some places it’s already here....
Continues: http://blog.rmi.org/blog_05_22_2013_is_a_high_renewables_energy_really_possible_part_one
(Part 2)
High Renewables are a Reality Today
The futures studies (referenced in yesterday’s post) are not a guarantee of what will happen. They’re various visions of what could happen. But increasingly, these possible futures are shifting from the hypothetical to the real. Around the world, economies are shifting to ones grounded in high penetrations of renewables.
In one sense, this isn’t news. Historically, there has been no shortage of countries powered mostly—even entirely—by renewables. But these countries, ranging from Norway and Sweden to Paraguay and Venezuela, have depended on large amounts of hydro. Yet we’re now seeing examples of high renewables powered by wind and solar, too.
In Denmark, the Danish Energy Agency set a bold goal for the country’s power to be 100 percent renewable by 2050, including generating 50 percent of electricity from wind by 2020. The country is well on its way to realizing that vision. In 2011, renewables accounted for more than 40 percent of Denmark’s domestic electricity production; wind power accounted for 28 percent of electricity generation. Then last year, wind crossed the 30 percent threshold. This year an offshore wind farm is expected to add another 400 MW to the country’s already installed 4.2 GW of wind capacity. Earlier this year in March, wind generated nearly 4 GW of power for the grid, just 800 MW shy of the entire country’s electricity needs. Later that same month, wind output exceeded nationwide demand, even if only for a short period.
There’s been similar success on a much larger scale in Spain, where installed wind capacity is five times that of Denmark. On a day in April 2012, wind supplied 61 percent of Spain’s electricity demand.
Momentary high-percentage outputs from variable renewables and Denmark’s ramp-up of renewables—with wind’s longer-term contributions to the grid there—have been more than commendable. In Portugal, meanwhile, we’re seeing equally impressive numbers of renewables’ sustained contributions of power to the grid. For a few hours toward the end of 2011, renewables supplied 100 percent of Portugal’s electricity. But over the first quarter of this year—three full months of 2013—renewables supplied an impressive 70 percent of that country’s power. Hydro accounted for 37 percent of electricity; wind ranked second with 27 percent of generation....
High Renewables are a Reality Today
The futures studies (referenced in yesterday’s post) are not a guarantee of what will happen. They’re various visions of what could happen. But increasingly, these possible futures are shifting from the hypothetical to the real. Around the world, economies are shifting to ones grounded in high penetrations of renewables.
In one sense, this isn’t news. Historically, there has been no shortage of countries powered mostly—even entirely—by renewables. But these countries, ranging from Norway and Sweden to Paraguay and Venezuela, have depended on large amounts of hydro. Yet we’re now seeing examples of high renewables powered by wind and solar, too.
In Denmark, the Danish Energy Agency set a bold goal for the country’s power to be 100 percent renewable by 2050, including generating 50 percent of electricity from wind by 2020. The country is well on its way to realizing that vision. In 2011, renewables accounted for more than 40 percent of Denmark’s domestic electricity production; wind power accounted for 28 percent of electricity generation. Then last year, wind crossed the 30 percent threshold. This year an offshore wind farm is expected to add another 400 MW to the country’s already installed 4.2 GW of wind capacity. Earlier this year in March, wind generated nearly 4 GW of power for the grid, just 800 MW shy of the entire country’s electricity needs. Later that same month, wind output exceeded nationwide demand, even if only for a short period.
There’s been similar success on a much larger scale in Spain, where installed wind capacity is five times that of Denmark. On a day in April 2012, wind supplied 61 percent of Spain’s electricity demand.
Momentary high-percentage outputs from variable renewables and Denmark’s ramp-up of renewables—with wind’s longer-term contributions to the grid there—have been more than commendable. In Portugal, meanwhile, we’re seeing equally impressive numbers of renewables’ sustained contributions of power to the grid. For a few hours toward the end of 2011, renewables supplied 100 percent of Portugal’s electricity. But over the first quarter of this year—three full months of 2013—renewables supplied an impressive 70 percent of that country’s power. Hydro accounted for 37 percent of electricity; wind ranked second with 27 percent of generation....
Continues: http://blog.rmi.org/blog_05_23_2013_is_a_high_renewables_energy_really_possible_part_two
Recommended reading:
Germany's Renewables Revolution
While the examples of Japan, China, and India show the promise of rapidly emerging energy economies built on efficiency and renewables, Germany—the world’s number four economy and Europe’s number one—has lately provided an impressive model of what a well-organized industrial society can achieve. To be sure, it’s not yet the world champion among countries with limited hydroelectricity: Denmark passed 40% renewable electricity in 2011 en route to a target of 100% by 2050, and Portugal, albeit with more hydropower, raised its renewable electricity fraction from 17% to 45% just during 2005–10 (while the U.S., though backed by a legacy of big hydro, crawled from 9% to 10%), reaching 70% in the rainy and windy first quarter of 2013. But these economies are not industrial giants like Germany, which remains the best disproof of claims that highly industrialized countries, let alone cold and cloudy ones, can do little with renewables.
Germany has doubled the renewable share of its total electricity consumption in the past six years to 23% in 2012...
While the examples of Japan, China, and India show the promise of rapidly emerging energy economies built on efficiency and renewables, Germany—the world’s number four economy and Europe’s number one—has lately provided an impressive model of what a well-organized industrial society can achieve. To be sure, it’s not yet the world champion among countries with limited hydroelectricity: Denmark passed 40% renewable electricity in 2011 en route to a target of 100% by 2050, and Portugal, albeit with more hydropower, raised its renewable electricity fraction from 17% to 45% just during 2005–10 (while the U.S., though backed by a legacy of big hydro, crawled from 9% to 10%), reaching 70% in the rainy and windy first quarter of 2013. But these economies are not industrial giants like Germany, which remains the best disproof of claims that highly industrialized countries, let alone cold and cloudy ones, can do little with renewables.
Germany has doubled the renewable share of its total electricity consumption in the past six years to 23% in 2012...
http://blog.rmi.org/blog_2013_04_17_germanys_renewables_revolution
eLab: The Value of Distributed Energy Resources (Video)
March 15, 2013
The U.S. is at the cusp of transformative change in the electricity system, and the only thing limiting us may be our imagination. Uncertainties about how to navigate that transformation remain, and eLab is hard at work answering the questions many organizations in the sector are trying to address, including:
What is the value of distributed energy resources? How can we build pricing mechanisms based on accurate signals and reflections of the market, and integrate power from thousands of different locations—while keeping the lights on?
“FERC’s regulatory responsibility is to ensure that rates are adjusted and reasonable and not under-discriminatory,” explains Mason Emnett, deputy policy director at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. “It’s important that we’ve got the rules right, so that customers are paying the appropriate rates and that resources are seeing the appropriate signals. eLab is an exciting collection of stakeholders and perspectives in that conversation.”
Watch now, and learn:
How to build a cleaner, more resilient electricity future with new types of technology—while successfully managing it in real time
Why eLab is exactly the right set of resources to help inform and accelerate aggregations of distributed resources interfacing with the grid
How eLab is enabling candid conversations with key stakeholders about price transparency and the real cost of renewables
What do you think it will take to change our electricity system to one that is cleaner, more reliable, and customer friendly?
http://blog.rmi.org/blog_2013_03_15_eLab_Value_of_Distributed_Energy_Resources
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
There are so many examples proving that the answer is a resounding "Yes!", that it's almost crazy that the question needs to be asked.
Yet it does because there's so much institutional resistance to renewables and so much ignorance, that it has to be raised again and again.
Not only is it possible, and not really that hard to realize, it is necessary for our long-term survival.
Suncor is a tar sands company. I don't know anyone, zero people on the left, who thinks that Suncor has a positive energy idea.
Your OP comes from RMI.org, the fossil fuel front run by Amory Lovins.
How can I say that Amory Lovins is a fossil fuel front?
Because on his website, he lists the companies for which he "consults," i.e, the companies that pay his bills.
Mr. Lovins’s clients have also included Accenture, Allstate, AMD, Anglo American, Anheuser-Busch, Bank of America, Baxter, Borg-Warner, BP, HP Bulmer, Carrier, Chevron, Ciba-Geigy, CLSA, ConocoPhillips, Corning, Dow, EDS, Equitable, Ford, GM, HP, Invensys, Lockheed Martin, Mitsubishi, Monsanto, Motorola, Norsk Hydro, Petrobras, Prudential, Rio Tinto, Royal Dutch/Shell, Shearson Lehman Amex, STMicroelectronics, Sun Oil, Suncor, Texas Instruments, UBS, Unilever, Westinghouse, Xerox, major developers, and over 100 energy utilities. His public-sector clients have included OECD, UN, RFF, the Australian, Canadian, Dutch, German, and Italian governments, 13 states, Congress, and the U.S. Energy and Defense Departments. He has been profiled in The Wall Street Journal (twice), Fortune, Harvard, The New Yorker, and The Economist. His latest book, with 60 RMI coauthors, is Reinventing Fire (2011).
http://www.rmi.org/Amory+B.+Lovins
As a (predictably) self declared "expert" on what is and what is not right wing, which part of Anglo Amerian, BP, Chevron, Petrobras, Rio Tinto, Royal Dutch/Shell, Sun Oil, Suncor (never mind "Major Developers"
don't you understand?
It is pretty right wing to 1) spout dogma in the face of reality, and 2) assume that you speak for everyone 3) to not give a rat's ass about the fact that the atmosphere is degrading from climate change at the fastest rate ever, and 4) to latch irreversibly on to 50 year old ideas that have been proved time and time again to not work.
Have a nice evening.
