Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumPaper: Scientific Consensus on Maintaining Humanity's Life Support Systems
The following paper was released on May 21 by Stanford University's Millennium Alliance on Humanity and the Biosphere, and is signed by over 500 scientists in different disciplines from around the world:
Scientific Consensus on Maintaining Humanity's Life Support Systems in the 21st Century (PDF)
As members of the scientific community actively involved in assessing the biological and societal impacts of global change, we are sounding the alarm to the world. For humanity's continued health and prosperity, we all - individuals, businesses, political leaders, religious leaders, scientists, and people in every walk of life - must work hard to solve these five global problems, starting today:
1. Climate Disruption
2. Extinctions
3. Loss of Ecosystem Diversity
4. Pollution
5. Human Population Growth and Resource Consumption
We further agree that, based on the best scientific information available, human quality of life will suffer substantial degradation by the year 2050 if we continue on our current path.
As members of the scientific community actively involved in assessing the biological and societal impacts of global change, we are sounding the alarm to the world. For humanity's continued health and prosperity, we all - individuals, businesses, political leaders, religious leaders, scientists, and people in every walk of life - must work hard to solve these five global problems, starting today:
1. Climate Disruption
2. Extinctions
3. Loss of Ecosystem Diversity
4. Pollution
5. Human Population Growth and Resource Consumption
We further agree that, based on the best scientific information available, human quality of life will suffer substantial degradation by the year 2050 if we continue on our current path.
This paper is worth reading from two points of view. One is to see the richness of the presentation of the problem, in all its gory dimensionality. The other is for the poverty of the solution proposals.
I finished reading the paper on the bus this morning. It made me feel like weeping. The solutionistas seem to have some odd kind of psychological block. They either can't follow the evidence to its logical conclusion, or they don't have the courage to speak the bottom line. All the numbers are there, all the evidence is so clearly laid out. The only thing that's missing is that last scintilla of comprehension. And that makes all the difference to the world.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 862 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paper: Scientific Consensus on Maintaining Humanity's Life Support Systems (Original Post)
GliderGuider
Jun 2013
OP
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)1. K&R
daleanime
(17,796 posts)2. K&R....
tinrobot
(10,916 posts)3. Yup...
We're screwed...
Socialistlemur
(770 posts)4. Seems to me population control has to be top priority
I'm seeing trends which show all sorts of shortages looming in the future. The most practical solution is population reduction. Everything else becomes manageable if we reduce our load.
hunter
(38,328 posts)5. We control population our way or nature's way.
Encouraging birth control is a lot nicer than nature's way.
But there will be "population control" whatever we do.