Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:32 PM Jan 2012

BP loses attempt to share Deepwater Horizon oil spill costs

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/27/bp-transocean-deepwater-spill-court

An attempt by BP to offload a major part of its Gulf of Mexico oil-spill compensation bill on to the US rig operator Transocean has been thrown out by a US court.

The setback comes in the run-up to the main legal case against BP and its partners on 27 February in New Orleans, which will rule over who is to blame for the Deepwater Horizon accident, in which 11 workers died.

Shares in the oil group fell 2.7% after a federal judge upheld a clause in the drilling contract that shielded Transocean from having to pay compensation for livelihoods damaged by the Macondo blowout in 2010.

But the district judge, Carl Barbier, left open the possibility that Transocean might still have to pay punitive damages or civil penalties imposed by the US government under the federal Clean Water Act.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BP loses attempt to share Deepwater Horizon oil spill costs (Original Post) xchrom Jan 2012 OP
Bright spot in the normal run of bleak news. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #1
"Bright spot"? Nihil Jan 2012 #2
But the district judge, Carl Barbier, left open the possibility that Transocean dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #3
Have to agree to disagree on that one. Nihil Jan 2012 #4
I see your point. dixiegrrrrl Jan 2012 #5
 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
2. "Bright spot"?
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 08:43 AM
Jan 2012

A US company that has been proven guilty in spills around the world is
protected by a US court with regard to a US spill and that's a "bright spot"?


dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
3. But the district judge, Carl Barbier, left open the possibility that Transocean
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 09:55 AM
Jan 2012

But the district judge, Carl Barbier, left open the possibility that Transocean might still have to pay punitive damages or civil penalties imposed by the US government under the federal Clean Water Act.


Bright spot:
BP cannot shift the financial consequences onto someone else, it gets to pay for its arrogance ( assuming of course that the court case is ever brought and settled)
and
Transocean does not get to totally wriggle out of responsibility

bright spot: potential these arrogant companies might be held accountable.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
4. Have to agree to disagree on that one.
Tue Jan 31, 2012, 05:06 AM
Jan 2012

1) BP are totally liable for their own part (and not only should get hammered but will).
2) Transocean have been granted a get out of jail free card for their incompetence.
3) Halliburton have slipped not just off the hook but completely out of the spotlight.

This means that
> bright spot: potential these arrogant companies might be held accountable.

has actually become "one out of the three arrogant companies might be held accountable."


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»BP loses attempt to share...