Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum"seeking a buyer for its stake in the plant for three to four years, without success"
Doubts dampen S.C.s nuclear future
Published: August 19, 2013
By RODDIE BURRIS rburris@thestate.com
The hallmark of the future of nuclear power right now is uncertainty.
Utilities largely have backed off any rush to forge ahead in constructing the next generation of expensive, new nuclear reactor plants even though they seemed plausible just a few years ago.
Santee Cooper, the state-owned utility in Moncks Corner, continues to try to divest itself of some portion of its 45 percent stake in two new reactors under construction at the V.C. Summer Nuclear Station in Jenkinsville, a $10 billion project.
...
Santee Cooper has been seeking a buyer for its stake in the plant for three to four years, without success....
Published: August 19, 2013
By RODDIE BURRIS rburris@thestate.com
The hallmark of the future of nuclear power right now is uncertainty.
Utilities largely have backed off any rush to forge ahead in constructing the next generation of expensive, new nuclear reactor plants even though they seemed plausible just a few years ago.
Santee Cooper, the state-owned utility in Moncks Corner, continues to try to divest itself of some portion of its 45 percent stake in two new reactors under construction at the V.C. Summer Nuclear Station in Jenkinsville, a $10 billion project.
...
Santee Cooper has been seeking a buyer for its stake in the plant for three to four years, without success....
Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2013/08/19/2927964/doubts-dampen-scs-nuclear-future.html#storylink=cpy
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 741 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"seeking a buyer for its stake in the plant for three to four years, without success" (Original Post)
kristopher
Aug 2013
OP
This is one of two flagship plants to prove nuclear's viability in today's energy landscape
kristopher
Aug 2013
#2
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)1. Why they think anyone would buy a filthy bomb, I don't know.
Musta watched too many "The Atom is our Friend" clips in the 50s.
kristopher
(29,798 posts)2. This is one of two flagship plants to prove nuclear's viability in today's energy landscape
As late as last year the major utilities in the SE region have laid out plans for expansion based on a couple of nuclear plants and lots of coal plants. The two things they can't bring themselves to pursue are renewable sources of generation and energy efficiency/conservation programs.
With the declining cost of solar, I think their customers might have other plans for them.
mbperrin
(7,672 posts)3. I think you're right about their customers.
And that's good!