Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
Wed May 7, 2014, 01:17 PM May 2014

Sweden's Vattenfall abandons research on CO2 storage

Sweden's Vattenfall abandons research on CO2 storage

Swedish energy giant Vattenfall said Tuesday that it had given up its research on CO2 capture and storage, intended to make the company's coal power plants greener.

Capturing and liquifying CO2 coming from carbon combustion to later store it underground was meant to curb greenhouse effect gas emissions, but its costs and the energy it requires make the technology unviable.

These difficulties had already forced Vattenfall to give up in 2011 a large project at a pilot plant in Jaenschwalde, in eastern Germany.

But Tuesday, the group said that CCS was not among its priorities anymore.

"We are evaluating our research portfolio in order to invest in R&D projects which can contribute more quickly to our business development," Research and Development Nordic head Karl Bergman said.

So the fate of the planet isn't a priority for them Got it. Now what?
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sweden's Vattenfall abandons research on CO2 storage (Original Post) GliderGuider May 2014 OP
We emit 10 giga-tons of CO2 per year. The idea of capturing that was always a joke. phantom power May 2014 #1
They're being realistic. CCS is just plain impractical. nt eppur_se_muova May 2014 #2
CCS was always a pipe dream. GliderGuider May 2014 #3
"but its costs and the energy it requires make the technology unviable" Nihil May 2014 #4
It won't of course, GliderGuider May 2014 #5
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
3. CCS was always a pipe dream.
Wed May 7, 2014, 08:16 PM
May 2014

The intensity of the hype around such a chimera is a clear signal that there just isn't anything else.

 

Nihil

(13,508 posts)
4. "but its costs and the energy it requires make the technology unviable"
Fri May 9, 2014, 08:23 AM
May 2014

Doubt that will stop the techno-utopians who will continue to tout CCS as if it were a solution
rather than a charade.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
5. It won't of course,
Fri May 9, 2014, 09:03 AM
May 2014

But the rest of us won't be too surprised when the whole CCS house of cards collapses and CO2 keeps pouring into the atmosphere.

It is what it is.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Sweden's Vattenfall aband...