Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 05:36 PM Feb 2012

One year on, Fukushima is still spinning

One year on, Fukushima is still spinning
Jim Green

The first anniversary of the Fukushima disaster is fast approaching and it promises to be another silly-season for Australia's pro-nuclear zealots.

They have form. While the crisis was unfolding in March last year, Ziggy Switkowski advised that "the best place to be whenever there's an earthquake is at the perimeter of a nuclear plant because they are designed so well."

Switkowski wants dozens of nuclear power plants built in Australia - dozens of places to shelter from earthquakes.

Even as nuclear fuel meltdown was in full swing at Fukushima, Adelaide University's Professor Barry Brook reassured us that:
"There is no credible risk of a serious accident... Those spreading FUD [fear, uncertainty and doubt] at the moment will be the ones left with egg on their faces. I am happy to be quoted forever after on the above if I am wrong ... but I won't be."

...


http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3832080.html
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bananas

(27,509 posts)
1. LOL - Barry Brook: "I am happy to be quoted forever after on the above if I am wrong ... but I won't be."
Thu Feb 16, 2012, 10:13 PM
Feb 2012

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
3. "I am happy to be quoted forever after on the above if I am wrong"
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 01:28 PM
Feb 2012

His reprehensible attempt to minimize the Fukushima disaster on behalf of the industrial interests he represents deserves to be a permanent part of his legacy.

That said the article in the OP is far wider than Brook, he is just one minor example.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
4. He drank the coolaid. Many, even DUers I would've respected on the issue...
Fri Feb 17, 2012, 09:15 PM
Feb 2012

...thought it was no big deal. As I observed the catastrophe and understood the magnitude of the event, I began to realize that even I had similar biases, but I didn't reveal them because of the uncertainties in the situation. Every day it would get worse, every day the archaic nuclear squad would come out in defense of that highly archaic, highly risky technology. Every day I kept my mouth shut.

Let it not be said that the nuclear industry lobby was quite effective at creating a cheerleading squad that comes to the defense of archaic nuclear technology even while advocating better and safer technology.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
5. This will be with us for a long long time
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:00 AM
Feb 2012

I just hope that the Japanese don't forget what splitting of atoms can do like they did the first time. Of all people who should never have embraced nuclear energy to begin with they did and did in it a relatively short time after big boy and fat man or whatever they were called

madokie

(51,076 posts)
7. And pushed by the agency that in the beginning was created to protect us, watch out for us
Sat Feb 18, 2012, 10:48 PM
Feb 2012

The NRC is but a sounding board for the nuclear power industry and always was.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»One year on, Fukushima is...