Heartland, Cato, Other Professional Liars Are No Longer "Deniers" - They're "Climate Optimists"!

[hatrack]

EDIT

It’s tempting to find irony in the spectacle of hundreds of climate change deniers staging their convention amid a drought of historic proportions. But, as the conference organizers are quick to tell you, they aren’t actually climate change deniers. The majority of this year’s speakers readily acknowledge that the climate is changing. Some­ will even concede that human emissions are playing a role. They just think the solutions are likely to be far worse than the problem.

“I don’t think anybody in this room denies climate change,” the Heartland Institute’s James M. Taylor said in his opening remarks Monday. “We recognize it, but we’re looking more at the causes, and more importantly, the consequences.” Those consequences, Taylor and his colleagues are convinced, are unlikely to be catastrophic—and they might even turn out to be beneficial. Don’t call them climate deniers. Call them climate optimists.

They aren’t an entirely new phenomenon. Fossil-fuel advocates have been touting the advantages of climate change since at least 1992, when the Western Fuels Association put out a pro­–global warming video called “The Greening of Planet Earth.” (It was a big hit with key figures in the George W. Bush administration.) Naomi Oreskes, co-author of Merchants of Doubt, traces this line of thinking even further back, to a 1983 report in which physicist Bill Nierenberg argued that humans would have no trouble adapting to a warmer world.

As global warming became more politically polarized, however, coal lobbyists and their shills largely discarded the “global warming is good” approach in favor of questioning the science behind climate change models. These days the liberal stereotype of the climate change denier sounds more like James Inhofe, the Republican senator from Oklahoma who dismisses “the global warming thing” as “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.” (He still appears to believe that.)

EDIT

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2014/07/heartland_institute_climate_change_conference_optimism_is_the_new_denial.html

[Nihil]

1. "Wrong" is still "wrong" ...

... even when painted pink, scattered with shiny sprinkles and with a ribbon wrapped around it.

[hatrack]

2. Or, as I only wish I'd said, putting frosting on a dog turd doesn't make it a wedding cake

[cprise]

3. Denying the severity of the problem is still denial.

The denial lobby has its fallback positions. Unless they agree to the cause and the severity global warming, they get no credit for being "optimists" or anything else.

[Stryst]

4. "They just think the solutions are likely to be far worse than the problem. "

You mean that your company won't be allowed to freely rape the earth and make trillions of dollars doing it anymore?