Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumBurning all fossil energy would raise sea-level by more than 50 meters – and (de-ice) Antarctica
https://www.pik-potsdam.de/news/press-releases/burning-all-fossil-energy-would-raise-sea-level-by-more-than-50-meters-2013-and-eliminate-all-ice-of-antarctica[font face=Serif][font size=5]Burning all fossil energy would raise sea-level by more than 50 meters and eliminate all ice of Antarctica[/font]
[font size=4]09/11/2015 - Burning all of the worlds available fossil-fuel resources would result in the complete melting of the Antarctic ice sheet, a new study to be published in Science Advances shows. The Antarctic ice masses store water equivalent to more than 50 meters of sea-level rise. The new calculations show that Antarcticas long-term contribution to sea-level rise could likely be restricted to a few meters that could still be manageable, if global warming did not exceed 2 degrees. Crossing this threshold, however, would in the long run destabilize both West and East Antarctica causing sea-level rise that would reshape coastal regions around the globe for millennia to come.[/font]
[font size=3]If we were to burn all attainable fossil fuel resources, this would eliminate the Antarctic ice sheet and cause long-term global sea-level rise unprecedented in human history, lead author Ricarda Winkelmann of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research says. This would not happen overnight, but the mind-boggling point is that our actions today are changing the face of planet Earth as we know it, and will continue to do so for tens of thousands of years to come. If we want to avoid Antarctica to become ice-free, we need to keep coal, gas and oil in the ground.
The long-term risk increases with every additional tenth of a degree of warming
By using more and more fossil energy, we increase the risk of triggering changes that we may not be able to stop or reverse in the future, co-author Anders Levermann of the Potsdam Institute explains. The West Antarctic ice sheet may already have tipped into a state of unstoppable ice loss, whether as a result of human activity or not. But if we want to pass on cities like Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Calcutta, Hamburg or New York as our future heritage, we need to avoid a tipping in East Antarctica, he says.
The idea was to compute what we have already started by emitting greenhouse-gas emissions from burning coal or oil and to analyze where that will take us in the future, says co-author Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford University. Burning all available fossil-fuel resources would result in carbon emissions of about 10,000 billion tons. Assuming a pulse of carbon release, the scientists simulations show that Antarctica would lose ice over at least the next ten thousand years in response, with an average contribution to sea-level rise of up to three meters per century during the first millennium. Consistent with recent observations and simulations, the scientists also found that even if global warming would be limited to two degrees, this already raises the risk of destabilizing the West Antarctic ice sheet. And the risk increases with every additional tenth of a degree of warming, with unabated carbon emissions threatening the Antarctic Ice Sheet in its entirety, Ken Caldeira concludes.
[/font][/font]
http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/8/e1500589[font size=4]09/11/2015 - Burning all of the worlds available fossil-fuel resources would result in the complete melting of the Antarctic ice sheet, a new study to be published in Science Advances shows. The Antarctic ice masses store water equivalent to more than 50 meters of sea-level rise. The new calculations show that Antarcticas long-term contribution to sea-level rise could likely be restricted to a few meters that could still be manageable, if global warming did not exceed 2 degrees. Crossing this threshold, however, would in the long run destabilize both West and East Antarctica causing sea-level rise that would reshape coastal regions around the globe for millennia to come.[/font]
[font size=3]If we were to burn all attainable fossil fuel resources, this would eliminate the Antarctic ice sheet and cause long-term global sea-level rise unprecedented in human history, lead author Ricarda Winkelmann of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research says. This would not happen overnight, but the mind-boggling point is that our actions today are changing the face of planet Earth as we know it, and will continue to do so for tens of thousands of years to come. If we want to avoid Antarctica to become ice-free, we need to keep coal, gas and oil in the ground.
The long-term risk increases with every additional tenth of a degree of warming
By using more and more fossil energy, we increase the risk of triggering changes that we may not be able to stop or reverse in the future, co-author Anders Levermann of the Potsdam Institute explains. The West Antarctic ice sheet may already have tipped into a state of unstoppable ice loss, whether as a result of human activity or not. But if we want to pass on cities like Tokyo, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Calcutta, Hamburg or New York as our future heritage, we need to avoid a tipping in East Antarctica, he says.
The idea was to compute what we have already started by emitting greenhouse-gas emissions from burning coal or oil and to analyze where that will take us in the future, says co-author Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science at Stanford University. Burning all available fossil-fuel resources would result in carbon emissions of about 10,000 billion tons. Assuming a pulse of carbon release, the scientists simulations show that Antarctica would lose ice over at least the next ten thousand years in response, with an average contribution to sea-level rise of up to three meters per century during the first millennium. Consistent with recent observations and simulations, the scientists also found that even if global warming would be limited to two degrees, this already raises the risk of destabilizing the West Antarctic ice sheet. And the risk increases with every additional tenth of a degree of warming, with unabated carbon emissions threatening the Antarctic Ice Sheet in its entirety, Ken Caldeira concludes.
[/font][/font]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 452 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Burning all fossil energy would raise sea-level by more than 50 meters – and (de-ice) Antarctica (Original Post)
OKIsItJustMe
Oct 2015
OP
daleanime
(17,796 posts)1. kick, kick, kick....