Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWorld temperature could rise rapidly by 2020, modelling suggests
https://www.uq.edu.au/news/article/2016/03/world-temperature-could-rise-rapidly-2020-modelling-suggests10 March 2016
[font size=3]CO₂ emissions and thus global warming could rise more quickly than expected, according to a new model by University of Queensland and [link:file:///C:/Users/uqcfung/Desktop/griffith.edu.au|Griffith University] researchers.
It forecasts that population and economic growth combined with rising energy use per person could significantly increase global energy demand and CO₂ emissions, causing world average temperature to rise by 1.5 degrees as early as 2020.
Nations at the 2015 UN Conference on Climate Change agreed to keep the rise in global average temperature below 2 degrees Celsius, preferably limiting it to 1.5 degrees to protect island states, Professor Hankamer said.
Our model shows we may have less time left than expected to prevent world temperature from rising above these thresholds.
[/font][/font]
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)I've got to give the guy props. And he's echoing my sentiment of "personal responsibility" combined with a few other things. And not afraid of two big words. Great. I have faith in humanity again.
This is the one that really speaks for me. It goes unheard every time- We have successfully applied our model to world energy demand from 1950-2010 and demonstrated that increases in energy efficiency alone dont offset the surge in in energy use per person, he said.
Some big unanswered questions that I also find impressive. Dilemmas. Like, you don't both rebuild the nation's infrastructures AND cut down on fossil fuel emissions. So it raises questions.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Cut our growth rates and populations significantly and go carbon/waste neutral on newer technologies.
That's anathema for Capitalism, which is why I think we're screwed unless we have a massive change of heart on our place in the world.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)As bad as global warming is, cutting the CO2 but not our overall energy consumption still leaves us with a world that is being deforested, strip-mined and denuded of other plant and animal species. It's not the CO2 that produces those effects, it's the energy production. Cleaning up the CO2 but leaving our energy use intact just leaves us with a carbon-neutral Business As Usual.
pscot
(21,024 posts)OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)The study is here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149406
pscot
(21,024 posts)We're already bumping up against 1.5 C. The IPCC projections seem to be based on hope rather than what's actually happening. It is unusual to see population increase explicitly linked to energy demand and, by extension, CO2 release.
NickB79
(19,236 posts)And I said I hoped it wasn't anything major:
"Hope in one hand, shit in the other, and see which fills up first."
It's shit. We're getting the shit.