Foreign Affairs
Related: About this forum"NYT Publishes Call to Bomb Iran & Friedman wants U.S. to arm ISIS?
NYT Publishes Call to Bomb Iran
The New York Times continues its slide into becoming little more than a neocon propaganda sheet as it followed the Washington Post in publishing an op-ed advocating the unprovoked bombing of Iran, reports Robert Parry.
By Robert Parry
March 29, 2015 "ICH" - "Consortium News" - If two major newspapers in, say, Russia published major articles openly advocating the unprovoked bombing of a country, say, Israel, the U.S. government and news media would be aflame with denunciations about aggression, criminality, madness, and behavior not fitting the Twenty-first Century.
But when the newspapers are American the New York Times and the Washington Post and the target country is Iran, no one in the U.S. government and media bats an eye. These inflammatory articles these incitements to murder and violation of international law are considered just normal discussion in the Land of Exceptionalism.
On Thursday, the New York Times printed an op-ed that urged the bombing of Iran as an alternative to reaching a diplomatic agreement that would sharply curtail Irans nuclear program and ensure that it was used only for peaceful purposes. The Post published a similar we-must-bomb-Iran op-ed two weeks ago.
The Times article by John Bolton, a neocon scholar from the American Enterprise Institute, was entitled To Stop Irans Bomb, Bomb Iran. It followed the Posts op-ed by Joshua Muravchik, formerly at AEI and now a fellow at the neocon-dominated School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins. [For more on that piece, see Consortiumnews.coms Neocon Admits Plan to Bomb Iran.]
Both articles called on the United States to mount a sustained bombing campaign against Iran to destroy its nuclear facilities and to promote regime change in Tehran. Ironically, these scholars rationalized their calls for unprovoked aggression against Iran under the theory that Iran is an aggressive state, although Iran has not invaded another country for centuries.
Bolton, who served as President George W. Bushs ambassador to the United Nations, based his call for war on the possibility that if Iran did develop a nuclear bomb which Iran denies seeking and which the U.S. intelligence community agrees Iran is not building such a hypothetical event could touch off an arms race in the Middle East.
-----------snip-----------
Friedmans Madness
The New York Times star neocon columnist Thomas L. Friedman ventured to the edge of madness as he floated the idea of the U.S. arming the head-chopping Islamic State, writing this month: Now I despise ISIS as much as anyone, but let me just toss out a different question: Should we be arming ISIS?
I realize the New York Times and Washington Post are protected by the First Amendment and can theoretically publish whatever they want. But the truth is that the newspapers are extremely restrictive in what they print. Their op-ed pages are not just free-for-alls for all sorts of opinions.
For instance, neither newspaper would publish a story that urged the United States to launch a bombing campaign to destroy Israels actual nuclear arsenal as a step toward creating a nuclear-free Middle East. That would be considered outside responsible thought and reasonable debate.
However, when it comes to advocating a bombing campaign against Irans peaceful nuclear program, the two newspapers are quite happy to publish such advocacy. The Times doesnt even blush when one of its most celebrated columnists mulls over the idea of sending weapons to the terrorists in ISIS all presumably because Israel has identified the Shiite crescent as its current chief enemy and the Islamic State is on the other side.
More at:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article41390.htm
Investigative reporter Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for The Associated Press and Newsweek in the 1980s