Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 02:53 PM Jan 2014

U.S. draft agreement omits Palestinian right of return, officials tell Haaretz

Officials add: Proposal makes no mention of Jerusalem being capital of future Palestinian state.

By Jack Khoury | Jan. 19, 2014

The United States has proposed absolving Israel of any responsibility for the fate of the Palestinian refugees in the forthcoming framework peace agreement, senior Palestinian officials told Haaretz over the weekend.

Instead, the draft framework agreement, which is due to be presented by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to Israel and the Palestinians toward the end of the month, will propose a solution based on the naturalization of the refugees in the countries in which they currently reside, as well as financial compensation.

The American proposal to omit mention of the refugees' right of return from the document has outraged Palestinian officials.

Both the proposal regarding the refugees and the American proposal on Jerusalem fail to meet the minimum requirements of the Palestinian Authority and have been rejected, a senior Palestinian official told Haaretz.

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.569352#
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. draft agreement omits Palestinian right of return, officials tell Haaretz (Original Post) Jefferson23 Jan 2014 OP
The line between azurnoir Jan 2014 #1
I meant to post the rest of it earlier: Jefferson23 Jan 2014 #2
Thanks azurnoir Jan 2014 #3
No problem. Jefferson23 Jan 2014 #4
Perfect word: enabler. That sums up the relationship nicely. R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #5

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. I meant to post the rest of it earlier:
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:58 PM
Jan 2014

On Jerusalem, the Americans have proposed wording that would "recognize the sensitivities and emotional attachment of the Palestinians to Jerusalem." The proposal was rejected by the Palestinians on the grounds that it makes no mention of the special status of Jerusalem as the capital of the future Palestinian state.

The Palestinian concerns arose during recent meetings between the Palestinian and American negotiating teams.

Senior Palestinian Authority officials told Haaretz that the U.S. has not yet completed drawing up the final version of the framework agreement. Negotiations between the two sides, which were scheduled to resume this week, are likely be deferred due to Kerry's involvement in the Syrian peace conference, which opens in Geneva this week.

Any harm to the status of Jerusalem or of the Al-Aqsa Mosque would be a death blow to a future peace agreement, the Al-Quds Committee announced over the weekend during a meeting in Marrakesh, Morocco. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas attended the meeting of the committee, which comprises representatives from all the Muslim countries.

The committee also announced that any Middle East peace agreement would need to include recognition of East Jerusalem as the capital of the Palestinian state.

The members of the committee denounced Israeli policy, which, they said, was aimed at creating facts on the ground, changing the demographic and geographic nature of East Jerusalem and harming the holy places. It called on the international community to intervene and prevent Israel from continuing to implement its policy.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»U.S. draft agreement omit...