Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 09:55 PM Jan 2014

Scarlett Johansson's naive SodaStream defense

http://972mag.com/scarlett-johanssons-naive-sodastream-defense/86287/

SodaStream produces domestic carbonation machines for making sodas at home, and has a large factory in the Mishor Adumim industrial zone, located inside Ma’ale Adumim, the third largest settlement in the occupied West Bank. (This fact is conspicuously absent from its Wikipedia page). The company has both Palestinian and Israeli employees, branding itself as an environmentally friendly, ethical alternative for soda lovers who want to do away with bottles – and that is what Scarlett Johansson claims she loves so much about SodaStream and why she is now its first-ever “brand ambassador.”

Johansson has been under severe scrutiny and media attention from anti-occupation activists and advocates of the BDS movement. Both the The New Yorker and NY Magazine covered the controversy, the latter with the funny, if forced headline: “Guilt-Free Seltzer or Blood Bubbles?” Robert Mackey who writes The New York Times’ Lede Blog has an excellent, detailed report, if you want to read more details.
---
Calling Israelis and Palestinians in the occupied West Bank who work for SodaStream “neighbors” with “equal rights” is beyond naive – it is insulting. Palestinians live under military rule, are not eligible to vote for the authorities that rule over their lives, are subject to military rather than civilian courts, and experience systematic discrimination in every aspect of life.

The argument that settlement companies like SodaStream are OK because they employ Palestinians holds no weight, since the political reality of occupation does not allow Palestinian workers to make a free and informed choice regarding their livelihoods. This argument has already been made many times, and especially poignantly by Who Profits, an Israeli NGO that documents Israel’s occupation industry.
48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scarlett Johansson's naive SodaStream defense (Original Post) R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 OP
Damned few people anywhere have the right Warpy Jan 2014 #1
Where do you live and work? R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #2
Who, me? Warpy Jan 2014 #3
Not sure why you skipped the question. Bad form that. It shows that you really R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #4
So, exactly how long Riftaxe Jan 2014 #5
Soon as Sweden allows Right of Return for every Russian or Rus that can prove they're azurnoir Jan 2014 #6
You might have an argument, based in reality, if I had emigrated or my parents had emigrated from R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #11
I was just pointing out Riftaxe Jan 2014 #13
How comical of you. R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #14
Why would anyone need to move? Violet_Crumble Jan 2014 #15
Are the Native Americans asking all Europeans to the US? azurnoir Jan 2014 #19
"aren't interested in human rights, the plight of the Palestinians,@ King_David Jan 2014 #8
They're exactly what these boycotts are about. You might obsere that for once R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #12
Do you think boycotting settlement products is antisemitic? Violet_Crumble Jan 2014 #16
Nope King_David Jan 2014 #17
what "a lot of people" believe in boycotting Jewish businesses everywhere? azurnoir Jan 2014 #18
It's the reaction of the BDS and "Israel is Apartheid " crowd King_David Jan 2014 #28
as you should be aware I am quite familiar with the thread nothing of the sort is posted there azurnoir Jan 2014 #31
Ha ha that's funny King_David Jan 2014 #33
if as you cllaim Israel had little to do with the exhibit is that even germane? azurnoir Jan 2014 #35
It was a Jewish Group's exhibition King_David Jan 2014 #36
was it sponsored by Israel yes or no? n/t azurnoir Jan 2014 #37
Canada Montenegro and a Jewish Group from the USA King_David Jan 2014 #38
like the song says "2 outta 3 ain't bad" Israel was one of the sponsors azurnoir Jan 2014 #39
Jewish exhibit of course . King_David Jan 2014 #40
sponsored by Israel about the history of Jews in Israel says the JewishJournal azurnoir Jan 2014 #41
The rest is just noise . King_David Jan 2014 #43
I'm pretty sure most people boycott Israel to varying degrees for the same reason I do... Violet_Crumble Jan 2014 #21
that would be Ariel university ... Israeli Jan 2014 #22
Thanks. I was having a brainfreeze moment n/t Violet_Crumble Jan 2014 #23
The Ariel students wanted to hear Obama ... Israeli Jan 2014 #24
That may be why someone like you may boycott anything. , King_David Jan 2014 #29
That was rather disjointed, Dave Scootaloo Jan 2014 #26
Thanks for this reply , they say that imitation is the best form of flattery , King_David Jan 2014 #30
So are you trying to flatter the Time Cube guy? Scootaloo Jan 2014 #44
that is a very revealing thread I found your claims that Israel had nothing to do with the exhibit azurnoir Jan 2014 #20
The Jewish exhibit was only "rescheduled " King_David Jan 2014 #27
there was no mention of pressure UNESCO had said from the beginning it was only postponed azurnoir Jan 2014 #32
As I said the reaction and response of King_David Jan 2014 #34
so your taking the the "latte libruls" route? azurnoir Jan 2014 #42
You should really stop with the Jew baiting method. R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2014 #46
More about the Palestinian workers and Israeli benevolence azurnoir Jan 2014 #7
Oh come on, it was a lucrative deal for her, anything else she stated is empty noise. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2014 #9
“Guilt-Free Seltzer or Blood Bubbles?” I love it! {{{chuckle}}} eom Purveyor Jan 2014 #10
Scarlett Johansson SodaStream ad nixed for Super Bowl azurnoir Jan 2014 #25
Money, lol. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2014 #45
sodastream edited the ad so it will air however azurnoir Jan 2014 #47
Frankly, Oxfam..I don't give a damn. Jefferson23 Jan 2014 #48

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
1. Damned few people anywhere have the right
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 09:59 PM
Jan 2014

"to make a free and informed choice regarding their livelihoods."

We work where jobs are open and can no longer afford any pride, at all.

If they were closed to anyone but Jews, I'd have a problem with them. They're not, apparently, and that means a few Palestinian Arabs can feed their kids.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
3. Who, me?
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 10:37 PM
Jan 2014

I'm a capitalist parasite, gainfully retired.

However, there were few instances where I was allowed to choose my employment except in the most general way. There was never a way to choose my pay.

Now it's your turn.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
4. Not sure why you skipped the question. Bad form that. It shows that you really
Sun Jan 26, 2014, 11:43 PM
Jan 2014

aren't interested in human rights, the plight of the Palestinians, those who exploit them or the apartheid state, not to mention enabler #1 USA, that keeps the whole crappy enterprise going.

Perhaps you should read a little more and count your lucky stars that you weren't treated as the Palestinians are today.

Johansson’s response sounds a lot like some Israeli settlers, who often argue that they live peacefully with Palestinians, and accuse “leftist” groups who come to protest and show solidarity of disrupting the peace. There are plenty of hippie settlers who make soaps and organic creams, and many of the free-range eggs sold in my supermarket in Jaffa come from settlements.

Even if an Israeli company is green, or treats its workers better than other establishments, it does not make up for the fact that it is situated on land held by force, whose native population is ruled against their will and demand an end to the occupation.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
5. So, exactly how long
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 01:18 AM
Jan 2014

before you emigrate from the US, over your concerns about the subjugated Native Americans?

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
6. Soon as Sweden allows Right of Return for every Russian or Rus that can prove they're
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 01:34 AM
Jan 2014

Russian 2 generations back

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
11. You might have an argument, based in reality, if I had emigrated or my parents had emigrated from
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 08:46 PM
Jan 2014

another country a generation ago.

But that's not to knock the plight of the First Nations in the USA, Canada, Mexico, Latin & South America as well as the islands. They definitely deserve more than the shitty treatment they have received over the years, and the USA has a large share of the blame.


This however is the I/P forum where issues surrounding the I/P conflict are discussed, and catcalls for me to return to someplace else is meaningless to the system of apartheid that Israel has created and continues to perpetuate.

But thank you for attempting to derail this discussion with your sophomoric observation.

Riftaxe

(2,693 posts)
13. I was just pointing out
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 10:24 PM
Jan 2014

your moral stand of convenience and your hypocrisy for reasons, only you know yourself.


Even if an Israeli company is green, or treats its workers better than other establishments, it does not make up for the fact that it is situated on land held by force, whose native population is ruled against their will and demand an end to the occupation.


It is apparent you are using that quote as a deflection, since your belief in it is quite obviously dubious at best.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
14. How comical of you.
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 10:33 PM
Jan 2014

My stand is a moral one, yes. The Israeli stand is not since the international community, as well as the UN, does not recognize illegal israeli settlements. Sodastream works out of one of these settlements and should be boycotted.

Are you suggesting that 300 million people living in America go home?

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
15. Why would anyone need to move?
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 12:40 AM
Jan 2014

It doesn't have anything to do with what was said in the post yr replying to

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
19. Are the Native Americans asking all Europeans to the US?
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 03:03 AM
Jan 2014

but what about Lintino's Blacks Asains are they welcome to stay? -is the US presently demolishing Native American homes to build areas for non Native Americans?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
8. "aren't interested in human rights, the plight of the Palestinians,@
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 08:47 AM
Jan 2014

Except that's not what any of these boycotts are all about....

Check out this thread, the BDS crowd, "Israel is Apartheid" crowd boycott anything Jewish ...

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113456345

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
12. They're exactly what these boycotts are about. You might obsere that for once
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 08:48 PM
Jan 2014

if you ever stopped from clutching your pearls.

King_David

(14,851 posts)
17. Nope
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 01:06 AM
Jan 2014

But a lot of people especially in the BDS movement and elsewhere believe in boycotting Jewish businesses and people everywhere .
They call Israel an Apartheid picnic state and make other platitudes about supporting Palestinians ( as long as they not located in Lebanon or Syria )
They cheer along when they think UNESCO has cancelled a JEWISH exhibition .
In France they invented a special type of Jew hating salute.

Yep for a lot of people support for one side of this conflict is only because of hate for a people . ( extreme right wing such as David Duke and extremist left such as the French comedian dude and extremists in general)

You betcha ... Boycott Israel boycott West Bank and Gaza if there were any Jews left there ,boycott Jewish exhibits boycott Jews...

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
18. what "a lot of people" believe in boycotting Jewish businesses everywhere?
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 02:28 AM
Jan 2014

and why are you still promoting the debunked fable that UNESCO cancelled a Jewish exhibit?

(Reuters) - A United Nations exhibition about Jews and the Holy Land, postponed after Arab countries warned it could harm Middle East peace efforts, will go ahead in June, organizers confirmed on Monday.

The exhibition was due to open last week at the Paris headquarters of the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural organisation (UNESCO) but was held up after 22 Arab member countries said could have a negative impact on peace talks.

The postponement of the exhibition entitled "People, Book, Land, The 3,500 Year Relationship of the Jewish People to the Holy Land" prompted criticism from Israel, the United States, Canada and Jewish groups around the world.

"The date has been set for June, 11," a UNESCO spokeswoman said without elaborating. The exhibition was co-sponsored by Israel, Canada and Montenegro.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/01/27/us-unesco-exhibition-idUSBREA0Q1JA20140127

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
31. as you should be aware I am quite familiar with the thread nothing of the sort is posted there
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:41 AM
Jan 2014

no one is supporting boycotting Jewish businesses there was no boycott or cancellation of the exhibit in question it was however postponed

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
35. if as you cllaim Israel had little to do with the exhibit is that even germane?
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:50 AM
Jan 2014

and if Israel did have something to with the exhibit such oh say sponsoring it, how is saying Israel should be scorned on the international stage any different than saying the same about any other country who's policies you disagree with, or does Israel in your opinion deserve special treatment because the majority of its citizens are Jewish?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
36. It was a Jewish Group's exhibition
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:52 AM
Jan 2014

About the Jewush people.

And that is what this crowd of people were responding to .

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
39. like the song says "2 outta 3 ain't bad" Israel was one of the sponsors
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 09:18 AM
Jan 2014
The postponement of the exhibition entitled "People, Book, Land, The 3,500 Year Relationship of the Jewish People to the Holy Land" prompted criticism from Israel, the United States, Canada and Jewish groups around the world.

"The date has been set for June, 11," a UNESCO spokeswoman said without elaborating. The exhibition was co-sponsored by Israel, Canada and Montenegro
.


http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/unesco_to_go_ahead_with_disputed_jewish_exhibition

King_David

(14,851 posts)
40. Jewish exhibit of course .
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 09:32 AM
Jan 2014

That's all anyone including the BDS cheerleaders knew... All else is irrelevant .

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
41. sponsored by Israel about the history of Jews in Israel says the JewishJournal
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 09:38 AM
Jan 2014


"The date has been set for June, 11," a UNESCO spokeswoman said without elaborating. The exhibition was co-sponsored by Israel, Canada and Montenegro.

http://www.jewishjournal.com/world/article/unesco_to_go_ahead_with_disputed_jewish_exhibition

Violet_Crumble

(35,961 posts)
21. I'm pretty sure most people boycott Israel to varying degrees for the same reason I do...
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 04:37 AM
Jan 2014

It's because of my opposition to the occupation that I refuse to purchase any goods produced in the West Bank, or from any Israeli businesses that support the occupation (eg Max Brenner). After much back and forthing, probably not worth the effort, as Israel doesn't tend to export much here and I'm more likely to see 'Made in the US' than 'Made in Israel' on anything, I decided I wouldn't refuse to buy something just because it's made in Israel unless the company supports the occupation. When it comes to academic boycotts, it was something Tanya Reinhart said when she visited here and I went to see her speak that made me think I couldn't support that form of boycott. She strongly supported a boycott of Israeli academics, including herself, and that got me thinking that if the uni I saw her at had decided on an academic boycott, then I would never have seen her make all the other very good points she made. The only academics I'd support boycotting would be those who are from that university Israel started in the West Bank. So there might be little rhyme or reason to my own personal boycott, and I know it has no effect on anything, but I think what I do is morally right for me.

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
22. that would be Ariel university ...
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 05:09 AM
Jan 2014

ref : " I'd support boycotting would be those who are from that university Israel started in the West Bank. "

see :
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4270632,00.html

Israeli

(4,151 posts)
24. The Ariel students wanted to hear Obama ...
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 05:26 AM
Jan 2014

but Ariel is not in Israel...

It seems the students from the "university" in Ariel very much wanted to hear the speech of US President Obama, which is nice. They held a publicized protest at not being invited. Their representative asked "Why are students from Israel boycotted?".

However, this is exactly the problem. Students from all the universities in Israel were invited to hear Obama's speech. But the students from Ariel are not students from Israel, since the settlement of Ariel just is not located in Israel.

Not only under International Law Even but even under Israel’s own law, the recognized international boundary of Israel passes between Kfar Saba and Qalqiliya, and anyone crossing this Green Line east wards is leaving the territory of the State of Israel - just like anyone boarding a plane at Tel-Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport.

Irresponsible politicians can assert that "there is a consensus on Ariel belonging to Israel." There is no such consensus in Israeli society, and the an opposite consensus in the international community - all countries, including the United States, regard Ariel as a settlement illegally built in Occupied Territory.

Anyone who goes to live or study at an armed enclave in the midst of an Occupied Territory must be ready to pay a price for it – and missing a Presidential speech might be the least price to pay.

http://zope.gush-shalom.org/home/en/channels/press_releases/1363817392/

King_David

(14,851 posts)
29. That may be why someone like you may boycott anything. ,
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:37 AM
Jan 2014

Most people boycotting the Jewish state and Jewish businesses and Jewish exhibitions have their own personal reasons .

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
26. That was rather disjointed, Dave
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:29 AM
Jan 2014

The goal of communication os to convey ideas between people. Not to fling words as if putting a dictionary through a salad shooter.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
44. So are you trying to flatter the Time Cube guy?
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:27 PM
Jan 2014
In 1884, meridian time personnel met in Washington to change Earth time. First words said was that only 1 day could be used on Earth to not change the 1 day bible. So they applied the 1 day and ignored the other 3 days. The bible time was wrong then and it proved wrong today. This a major lie has so much evil feed from it's wrong. No man on Earth has no belly-button, it proves every believer on Earth a liar.

http://www.timecube.com/

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
20. that is a very revealing thread I found your claims that Israel had nothing to do with the exhibit
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 03:08 AM
Jan 2014

quite interesting because Israel sponsored it, but none the less it has been rescheduled for June 11 2014 is there some reason that date is less desirable?

King_David

(14,851 posts)
27. The Jewish exhibit was only "rescheduled "
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:32 AM
Jan 2014

Under immense pressure causing UNESCO to backtrack . But that's all irrelevant.

What is relevant is the cheerleaders and supporters of the reported cancellation of a Jewish Exhibit .

See this thread for example :

http://www.democraticunderground.com/113456345

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
32. there was no mention of pressure UNESCO had said from the beginning it was only postponed
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:44 AM
Jan 2014

it was plainly stated on their website-the canceled/boycotted hysteria was whipped up from outside no names have been mentioned as to who made the initial and highly inaccurate claims

King_David

(14,851 posts)
34. As I said the reaction and response of
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 08:49 AM
Jan 2014

Those who thought it was a cancellation of a Jewish exhibition is what's interesting .

It shows us all why the Western Starbucks Latte crowd really do support justice for the Palestinians- it's because of the Jews.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
46. You should really stop with the Jew baiting method.
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:42 PM
Jan 2014

It is really a scary position that you take and try to imprint on others here.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
7. More about the Palestinian workers and Israeli benevolence
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 01:41 AM
Jan 2014

While, technically, Palestinians who work in settlements are largely covered by Israeli labor laws, there is little enforcement of labor regulations in settlements. As a result, Palestinian workers, including women and children, are frequently exploited by Israeli employers.

SodaStream’s Mishor Edomim factory has been the subject of numerous complaints by Palestinian workers over the years, having to do with low wages, discrimination, and poor working conditions. In 2008, Palestinian workers staged a protest at the factory after the contractor that hired them refused to improve working conditions or raise their pay, which amounted to less than half the legal minimum wage at the time. Seventeen workers were fired before they were rehired following unflattering press coverage and pressure from NGOs. However, in a 2010 report, Israeli NGO Kav LaOved, which works on labor issues, noted that Palestinian workers at SodaStream’s Mishor Edomim plant continued to be “at the bottom of the hierarchy in the factory and remain fearful of dismissal.”

Palestinians who work for SodaStream and other companies that operate in settlement industrial parks also face severe restrictions on their movements and their ability to organize to protect workers’ rights. They have to be approved and obtain special permission from Israel's General Security Service (Shabak*). As noted in a report issued by Israeli NGO Who Profits?, “Their dependence on these permits limits the workers’ employment choices and makes organizing almost impossible.”

SodaStream stock has been billed as a hot property since the company went public on the NASDAQ in November 2010. However, in January 2014 the price of SodaStream shares plunged after the company reported preliminary earnings that failed to achieve analysts’ estimates.

http://imeu.net/news/article0024811.shtml

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
47. sodastream edited the ad so it will air however
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 02:59 AM
Jan 2014

Johansson stepping down as Oxfam ambassador

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Scarlett Johansson is ending her relationship with a humanitarian group after being criticized over her support for an Israeli company that operates in the West Bank.

A statement released by Johansson's spokesman Wednesday said the 29-year-old actress has "a fundamental difference of opinion" with Oxfam International because the humanitarian group opposes all trade from Israeli settlements, saying they are illegal and deny Palestinian rights.

"Scarlett Johansson has respectfully decided to end her ambassador role with Oxfam after eight years," the statement said. "She and Oxfam have a fundamental difference of opinion in regards to the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement. She is very proud of her accomplishments and fundraising efforts during her tenure with Oxfam."

Earlier this month, "The Avengers" and "Her" actress signed on as the first global brand ambassador of SodaStream International Ltd., and she's set to appear in an ad for the at-home soda maker during the Super Bowl on Feb. 2.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/01/29/scarlett-johansson-oxfam/5046687/

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Scarlett Johansson's naiv...