Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

King_David

(14,851 posts)
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 05:56 PM Jul 2014

Egypt’s decision to side with Israel has cost Gaza dear

Last week a convoy carrying medical supplies to Gaza from Egypt was turned back by Egyptian soldiers over 100km from the border. The convoy’s organisers knew they risked being stopped – but that was part of the point. “It was expected,” said Salma Said on her return home. “They do not want Egyptians to show support for Palestinians. They want to make sure that this siege and this isolation continues.”

During this latest Gazan war, the conflict has been predominantly portrayed as one between Israel and Hamas. But a third party has exacerbated the tensions in Israel’s favour: Egypt. A traditional broker of Israeli-Palestinian relations, Egypt is usually assumed to act with Gaza’s best interests at heart – and has done its best to maintain that perception in recent weeks. It has condemned Gazan deaths, called for a ceasefire, and allowed a few critically injured Gazans to be treated in Egyptian hospitals. Since Said’s blocked convoy, Egyptian officials have also finally allowed other medics and medical supplies to cross the border.

But other Egyptian actions – both over the past year, and in recent days – have led to accusations that Egypt is indifferent to Gazan suffering – and that its interests are aligned with Israel’s. Since last July Egypt has bolstered Israel’s blockade on Gaza by destroying over 1,600 tunnels that smugglers once used to bring crucial goods (and weapons) into the territory. The end of the tunnel trade, which Egypt had tolerated for years, crippled Gaza economically, since the simultaneous closure of Egypt’s formal border at Rafah meant Gazans had no other way of importing many supplies.

Hamas’s decision to carry on fighting in recent weeks despite catastrophic civilian losses owed as much to Egypt’s refusal to lift this blockade as it does to Israel’s. Egypt wanted Hamas to accept an immediate ceasefire without preconditions. But Hamas wanted Egypt to spell out how it might ease the siege before it did so.

Egypt’s leaders are loth to help Hamas because the group is an offshoot and ally of Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood – whose scion, Mohamed Morsi, was ousted from office last July. To shore up its power, Egypt’s new regime, headed by the former army chief Abdel Fatah al-Sisi, has since waged a brutal crackdown on the Brotherhood inside Egypt. The squeeze on Hamas is part of the attempt to starve the Brotherhood of any remaining support.


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/30/egypt-siding-israel-cost-gaza-dear

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Egypt’s decision to side with Israel has cost Gaza dear (Original Post) King_David Jul 2014 OP
So, add the butcher of Cairo to Israel's corner. Go Israel? Scootaloo Jul 2014 #1
I thought it was interesting. King_David Jul 2014 #2
Not when you think about it Scootaloo Jul 2014 #3
Also Hamas and the Brotherhood are tight , King_David Jul 2014 #4
This is no surprise, Sisi doesn't think twice about killing his own people. n/t Jefferson23 Jul 2014 #5
Not surprised at all . nt King_David Jul 2014 #6
 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
3. Not when you think about it
Wed Jul 30, 2014, 06:07 PM
Jul 2014

Egypt receives almost as much military bankroll from the US as Israel does - it's something like 2.3 billion per annum. That bankroll is dependent on Egypt lapdogging for Israel. And "president" al-Sisi is the primary beneficiary when Egypt's military gets paid.

As they say, "follow the money."

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Egypt’s decision to side ...