Women's Rights & Issues
Related: About this forumEnough of modern health scares – we should be trusting our instincts
Enough of modern health scares we should be trusting our instincts
?w=620&q=85&auto=format&sharp=10&s=5020e55e654795e6e70c93a79b8a9dc0
Just because the so-called medical experts tell us something, it doesnt mean its true
Surely it should be up to a woman to decide whether to take HRT.
On Thursday, a million women experiencing the toughest time in the menopause hot flushes, insomnia, startling mood swings could have read the news that GPs are once again being encouraged to prescribe hormone replacement therapy (HRT).
A study, published in 2003, had shown a significant increase in the risk of cancer. Last week, the health watchdog, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, said GPs had wrongly lost confidence in the drug. Women had been left to suffer in silence. Now, according to Nice, the benefits of HRT far outweigh the risks. Twenty-four hours later, a different story was reported. Nine experts on the 18-strong panel advising Nice were claimed to have financial links with drug companies behind HRT, companies that have seen their market shrink from 33% of menopausal women on HRT to only 10%. Moreover, two Oxford academics, Professor Klim McPherson and Professor Valerie Beral, who have spent 12 years studying the risks associated with HRT, were not consulted about the new guidance.
Prof McPherson says that if GPs follow Nices advice, there could be 7,000 extra cases of breast cancer within 10 years. That contradicts Nices view or does it? that out of 1,000 women taking HRT for five years, there could be just six extra cases of breast cancer and 1.5 additional cases of ovarian cancer.
Confused, dazed and addled? We ought to be, not least because we have allowed two warring tribes managers and experts to infantilise us as they bombard us with conflicting advice and shaky metrics. (Is a glass of wine one unit or three? How big is the glass? How generous the host?) On booze, sugar, bacon butties, salt, fat and tobacco, percentages are tossed about, fear stoked and guilt heightened by headline after headline that, too often, misread research findings and fail to correctly interpret levels of risk.
. . . .
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/15/health-scares-trust-our-instincts
Demeter
(85,373 posts)but then, I never suffered in childbirth, either: two live natural births, no big deal. Both babies over 9 lbs, too.
I attribute it to no caffeine or other drug use, and lots of physical conditioning, and high pain threshold. And attitude. And those damn vitamins are responsible for the large babies; either that, or their paternal genes.
When you do real physical work: ballet, digging holes, lugging 40 lbs, etc....you know the difference between work and pain due to injury. Labor is work, and even though the first labor seems to last forever (13 hours, all night long) the second was only about 3.5 hours.
NOTE: my mother suffered menopause for years...but she smoked and drank coffee, went through twilight sleep 4 times, and was in poor shape through out.