Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,425 posts)
Fri Sep 30, 2022, 09:15 AM Sep 2022

Fifth Circuit reverses and grants judgment *for* a judge who does a prayer ceremony in his courtroom

The First Amendment Retweeted

The Fifth Circuit reverses and grants judgment *for* a judge who does a prayer ceremony in his courtroom before hearing cases.

Judge Jolly dissents in relevant part. His description of what the scene in Court is like is below. 1/

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pmSsfAo4bwvIVjNaC3kIzBBqUzGQfl_6/view?usp=sharing


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fifth Circuit reverses and grants judgment *for* a judge who does a prayer ceremony in his courtroom (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2022 OP
This is outrageous and ridiculous. magicarpet Sep 2022 #1
Yet seems consistent with what the courts have said in other cases FBaggins Sep 2022 #5
Step by step,.... magicarpet Sep 2022 #6
So sick of religious fucks forcing their bullshit down our throats. -nt CrispyQ Sep 2022 #2
Aren't they just going back to what it used to be back in the day? jimfields33 Sep 2022 #3
I don't recall that group prayer in court used to be a thing. -nt CrispyQ Sep 2022 #4
Maybe not. I just thought they were more religious back in the 1800s. jimfields33 Sep 2022 #7
The coercion is evident on its face. Chainfire Sep 2022 #8

FBaggins

(26,731 posts)
5. Yet seems consistent with what the courts have said in other cases
Fri Sep 30, 2022, 09:43 AM
Sep 2022

Lots of governmental bodies open with prayer. They can get away with it if the prayers are offered by someone else ("chaplain" ) and if the group of "someone elses" is open to lots of different religions and is not a mandatory part of the governmental session.

It may be outrageous and ridiculous but it isn't illegal under current law.

jimfields33

(15,787 posts)
3. Aren't they just going back to what it used to be back in the day?
Fri Sep 30, 2022, 09:37 AM
Sep 2022

I’m not saying it’s right, but it seems like they’re just returning to the ways of the past.

jimfields33

(15,787 posts)
7. Maybe not. I just thought they were more religious back in the 1800s.
Fri Sep 30, 2022, 09:55 AM
Sep 2022

But you could be right and that is not true.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Fifth Circuit reverses an...