Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 06:06 AM Mar 2014

NRA's model law invites tragedy

This week, the Kentucky Senate passed a bill that would allow concealed-carry weapons permit holders to carry guns in bars, provided they don't consume alcohol. Currently, guns are banned,, under Kentucky law, in bars and restaurants that serve alcohol.

Described as "model legislation from the National Rifle Association" by the bill's sponsor, Sen. John Schickel, R-Union, Senate Bill 60 is moving on to the House of Representatives.

The Kentucky chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America believes this reckless bill puts public health and safety at risk by mixing guns and drinking, and puts Kentucky bar and restaurant owners at risk for significant liability issues if and when a shooting occurs at their establishments.

Reaction to the news of SB60 has been swift and decisive: Kentuckians — including bar owners, gun owners and concealed-carry permit holders — do not want guns in bars under any circumstance.

http://www.kentucky.com/2014/02/23/3104632/ky-voices-tracey-goodlet-says.html#storylink=cpy
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NRA's model law invites tragedy (Original Post) SecularMotion Mar 2014 OP
Could a bar then refuse to serve alcoholic drinks to gun-owners? DetlefK Mar 2014 #1
It is unlikely they would know someone was carrying hack89 Mar 2014 #2
in most states it is a felony to drink while armed gejohnston Mar 2014 #5
Are there other states with similar laws? Jenoch Mar 2014 #3
It has always been legal in New York. Straw Man Mar 2014 #4
Legal in WA state with no problems. ManiacJoe Mar 2014 #15
you always could in California gejohnston Mar 2014 #6
The point here that all replies choose to ignore SecularMotion Mar 2014 #7
Ignore? Straw Man Mar 2014 #8
Oh look! beevul Mar 2014 #9
Once upon a time ... there was the "Million Mom March" DonP Mar 2014 #10
Things aren't exactly going swimmingly more um...locally...either beevul Mar 2014 #12
I've searched through articles that speak of opposition, but can't find numbers SecularMotion Mar 2014 #11
Many. Many. Straw Man Mar 2014 #13
Perhaps there is a settlement... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2014 #14
I loved that book in HS DonP Mar 2014 #16
We might have something here... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2014 #19
It passed 30-4, it wasn't really a close vote. Travis_0004 Mar 2014 #17
That's fair and actually somewhat unusual on DU. ... spin Mar 2014 #18

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
5. in most states it is a felony to drink while armed
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 12:35 PM
Mar 2014

I'm sure Kentucky would have a similar provision.

Straw Man

(6,623 posts)
4. It has always been legal in New York.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 12:08 PM
Mar 2014

Doesn't seem to be a problem.

The Sullivan Law was created to ensure that only cops and Tammany Hall goons would be armed. Keeping the latter out of saloons would have been impossible.

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
15. Legal in WA state with no problems.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 05:04 PM
Mar 2014

We just have to keep the guns out of the "21 and older" parts of the restaurant/bar.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
6. you always could in California
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 12:47 PM
Mar 2014

and even carry in a courtroom,
and Kentucky is wondering about bringing one in bars.

 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
7. The point here that all replies choose to ignore
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 01:10 PM
Mar 2014

Last edited Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:16 PM - Edit history (1)

is the NRA writing and pushing legislation in opposition of many Kentuckians.

The NRA, ALEC, & Koch brothers are anti-democracy.

Straw Man

(6,623 posts)
8. Ignore?
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 02:23 PM
Mar 2014
The point here that all replies choose to ignore

is the NRA writing and pushing legislation in opposition to the majority of Kentuckians.

The article says nothing about "the majority of Kentuckians." It quotes two people. That's not a majority unless the population of Kentucky is three.
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
10. Once upon a time ... there was the "Million Mom March"
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:00 PM
Mar 2014

Until they couldn't get the time of day from the media and had some really embarrassing incidents where some of the the "Mom's" shot people. Then they "merged" with the Brady group and haven't been heard from in a decade.

They were going to change the world too.

Of course they weren't smart enough to sell out to Bloomberg for 30 pieces of silver and a golden parachute for the PR maven either.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
12. Things aren't exactly going swimmingly more um...locally...either
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:16 PM
Mar 2014

Things aren't exactly going swimmingly more um...locally...either:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12626035

Dates back to 2012.


Which is part of the reason, I suspect, for the semi-recent trend in google dumps here.

 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
11. I've searched through articles that speak of opposition, but can't find numbers
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 03:15 PM
Mar 2014

so to be fair. I'll change majority to many.

Straw Man

(6,623 posts)
13. Many. Many.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 04:19 PM
Mar 2014
I've searched through articles that speak of opposition, but can't find numbers

so to be fair. I'll change majority to many.

"Many" as in "more than one"?

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
14. Perhaps there is a settlement...
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 04:57 PM
Mar 2014

...of Khoikhoi in Kentucky. In his book One, Two, Three... Infinity George Gamow mentioned that the Khoikhoi (referred to in the book as "Hottentots&quot have names for only four numbers. One, two three and 'many'.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
16. I loved that book in HS
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 06:15 PM
Mar 2014

It was the first book that really expanded my thinking about math and probabilities. I remember that section; "1, 2, 3, many".

It was also the first place I ever saw - the "Infinite number of monkeys at the infinite number of typewriters... will eventually write Hamlet" and ... to keep it on topic the Bill of Rights too.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
17. It passed 30-4, it wasn't really a close vote.
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 06:20 PM
Mar 2014

Kentucky is a pretty friendly state when it comes to RKBA, so it doesn't suprise me that the vote would go this way. Elections have consequences. If you are not happy with the way a politician votes, then throw them out of office next election. Im guessing that most people in Kentucky support this law. If they don't, then they can get it changed next election. I just wouldn't hold my breath.

spin

(17,493 posts)
18. That's fair and actually somewhat unusual on DU. ...
Tue Mar 11, 2014, 06:32 PM
Mar 2014

Most here refuse to admit that they are wrong or even inaccurate.

Of course that is not unusual in our nation today. Perhaps that is why we don't make any progress solving our problems.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»NRA's model law invites t...