Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 07:50 AM Jul 2015

San Francisco Could Make Gun Sale Regulations Even Stricter

Big changes could be coming to how guns and bullets are sold in San Francisco, even though there is only one shop in the city that's legally allowed to sell firearms.

Nonetheless, after a violent start to 2015, city leaders are trying to make it even tougher to buy and sell guns.

Farrell’s proposal has two main parts: The first portion would require the videotaping of all gun and ammunition sales in San Francisco, as well as video surveillance of all places in the store where guns or ammo are kept, handled and transferred.

The second portion of Farrell’s proposal would require ammunition dealers to store and electronically send sales data to San Francisco police every week for at least five years.

http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/San-Francisco-Could-Make-Gun-Sale-Regulations-Even-Stricter-315018131.html
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to SecularMotion (Original post)

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
2. Another Gooogle cut and paste drive by post
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:29 AM
Jul 2015

Any comment from you? I think this will just drive more people out to outlying areas and cost the city tax revenue. As a host I wish you would follow the spirit is not the letter of the group SOP and at least comment and DISCUSS your posts. This is very disrespectful to this group and to the actual group host of this group that you do not host.

 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
4. Another off-topic meta post
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:37 AM
Jul 2015

If you have issues with what is being posted and where it is posted, please use the ATA forum.

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
6. you are not the host here
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:54 AM
Jul 2015

I posted a comment that was directly related to the article. I tend not to use up the admins valuable time by going to them every time I get a post locked or have a point to make about a poster.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
3. They don't even try to pretend what their true motive is
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:30 AM
Jul 2015
and even with only one legally licensed dealer left in the city, he says this will act as a sort of deterrent to keep that kind of business out of city limits.
 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
8. No question. When they say "reasonable commonsense" gun control...
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:02 PM
Jul 2015

No question. When they say "reasonable commonsense" gun control, 1 dealer per city the size of SF is precisely what they have in mind, as a 'good start'.

San Francisco Could Make Gun Sale Regulations Even Stricter


As usual, for everyone that isn't shooting others or being violent.
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
12. "SFO joins Chicago as major NRA and SAF contributors"
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:53 PM
Jul 2015

That will be the SF Chronicle's headline in a few months.

SFO has lagged in writing checks to the NRA and SAF legal teams for a few years.

After forking over a few hundred thousand $$$ for the SF handgun ban, they let Chicago and Rahm take over the leadership in contributing to their legal fund.

But clearly, the SF Board of Supervisors don't want Chicago multi million dollar legal fund payday to the SAF and NRA to go unchallenged.

They want to be sure and have their own checks recognized when they lose in court again on this 2nd amendment version of a Poll Tax.

Can't wait for the squealing about how "that money should go to the schools, not the NRA" etc.

I just hope the NRA and SAF are nice about it this time and at least give the Board of Supervisors free T-shirts when they lose and have to write those big checks again. And maybe a one year membership for the mayor and a coupon good for the Basic Pistol class.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
11. It will be a boon to neighboring cities and towns
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 12:22 PM
Jul 2015

If this counts as a gun control victory then you have really lowered your expectations. A 20 year losing streak can do that.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
13. SF taxpayers will soon cry over the new fleet of Benzs they'll purchase. For pro-2A attorneys.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 01:07 PM
Jul 2015


God! they must have a huge tax base.

edgineered

(2,101 posts)
5. It probably makes good sense to some -
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:41 AM
Jul 2015

if one were to consider that a large truck would also be needed to haul the massive gun safe into the city - because only the law abiding citizens do stupid things with a weapons. it just gets dumber every day

S_B_Jackson

(906 posts)
18. So a San Franciscan simply drives to another county...
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:56 AM
Jul 2015

and legally purchases firearms and ammunition in other municipalities/counties. A boon for them, and SF is left to scratch their asses wondering "Why isn't this working?"

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»San Francisco Could Make ...