Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 12:37 PM Jul 2012

Are You Too Stupid For Concealed Carry?

Last edited Thu Jul 12, 2012, 01:54 PM - Edit history (1)

This article contains some valid points...enjoy.

(edited for potential snark made by me)


By Paul McCain
Let’s face it, aside from owning the right gun and gear, not everyone is equipped to carry a concealed weapon. With the boom in firearm ownership in recent years, there are a lot of new gun owners. And plenty of first-timers seem to have picked up that first gun as an impulse buy, apparently thinking, “Hey, I’m going to buy me a gun and carry it!” Their friends pack heat so how hard can it really be, right? If you’re too stupid to think through some really important questions before you start carrying, you have no business walking around with a concealed weapon. You need to stop to consider that . . .
There are legal, ethical, moral and competency implications whenever you strap on a firearm. Here are just some of the things you need to be aware of:

Legal Implications
If you carry a gun, you need to be prepared to accept the legal consequences, whatever they may be. Are you willing to go through the trouble and expense – both financially and emotionally – of being arrested, charged and tried if you have to use your firearm? If not, leave the heater at home. Can you deal with whatever might come your way when it comes to encounters with law enforcement officials who may or may not understand and respect your state and local carry laws? If not, don’t carry.

Ethical Implications
When you take on the responsibility of being an armed citizen, you also assume a greater level of ethical responsibility for every aspect of your behavior while packing. You don’t pick fights. You don’t respond to aggressive comments or gestures by going for your gat. You never go looking for trouble. You don’t – ever – drink while armed. And you never brandish it or joke around about carrying concealed. Concealed means concealed…in every possible sense. If you can’t conceal it, do not tote it. You aren’t trying to impress anyone by carrying. Your ethical posture hasto be above reproach when carrying.

Moral Implications
Are you mentally prepared to actually shoot and kill somebody? If not, the gun should stay in your safe. If you think you are just going to pull the gun out and wave it around to scare somebody off, don’t carry. If you think you can “shoot to wound,” you have another thing coming.
If the gun comes out of its holster, you must already have decided to kill somebody. Period. There is no middle ground. Can you do that? Have you thought long and hard about what that means? Are you willing to see what a bullet will do to a human body? People don’t always just fall over dead like in the movies. You have to prepare yourself for the emotional trauma of gravely wounding or killing another human being.

Competency Implications
If you are going to carry a concealed weapon, you need to be rigorous about safe, competent gun handling. Your heater is always loaded – or it better be. That means you must never ever, under any circumstance, draw it while carrying unless you’re truly in a life or death situation.
You do not pull it out to show to your buddies. You never cover anyone with the muzzle. Your finger should be indexed. You simply do not “play around” with your concealed firearm. It goes in the holster and never comes out, unless absolutely necessary.
And you need to be fully trained in the use of your firearm. Find a competent instructor and take a class. Better yet, take several classes. Just as if you want to get to Carnegie hall, you need to practice, practice and practice some more. You owe it to yourself to get in as much range time with your carry gun as you possibly can. If you aren’t willing to master all aspects of handling your concealed carry firearm, don’t strap it on.
Are you too stupid to handle all of this? Most likely not. But these are just some of the things you will need to consider before you take on the responsibility of concealed carry. Yes, it’s your right, but you need to exercise that right legally, ethically, morally and competently or you’ll hurt the cause of those that do. Got it?


***LINKY DINK***

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2012/07/daniel-zimmerman/are-you-too-stupid-for-concealed-carry/
60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Are You Too Stupid For Concealed Carry? (Original Post) Meiko Jul 2012 OP
I wrestled with the decision to get my permit for about a year. permatex Jul 2012 #1
Excellent post! Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #2
The author doesn't understand the basic principles of legal self-defense. TPaine7 Jul 2012 #8
No, I think the author nailed it perfectly. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #12
Let me fix the author's article and your post: Spoonman Jul 2012 #20
All very true and nothing to do with the OP Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #22
Nah... Glassunion Jul 2012 #10
Agree and disagree sarisataka Jul 2012 #14
I agree, and I edited my post by adding "possibly". Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #18
Now we're tracking sarisataka Jul 2012 #19
You might want to edit out the snark. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #3
You might want to follow your own advice, re Post #2. n/t PavePusher Jul 2012 #4
There is no snark there Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #5
You assume to know someone's frame of mind --- Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #6
Removed by OP Meiko Jul 2012 #7
good enough. thanks. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #9
Don't you think that it's a pretty fair assumption? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #13
You should know better than to make such assumptions. Clames Jul 2012 #16
Instead of the constant personal attacks, why don't you make a valid point? Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #17
Personal attacks? Another erroneous assumption. Clames Jul 2012 #30
sorry. no. I have no expectations. I assume nothing about NoOne. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #23
I find that hard to believe. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #25
I deduce. I don't assume Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #26
Don't we all, hopefully. They are not mutually exclusive. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #28
no. a gun on a person is not evidence of intent. sorry. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #29
You may well be right. Interesting. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #33
Mindless habit? Clames Jul 2012 #38
Yeah you're right, as usual and right on topic. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #55
Like you have room to complain. Clames Jul 2012 #59
there are legal ramifications to be considered. legal terminology if you prefer. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #41
This message was self-deleted by its author Clames Jul 2012 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #45
Plan on following your own advice? Clames Jul 2012 #11
I use my recs rarely sarisataka Jul 2012 #15
Real title should be bongbong Jul 2012 #21
manly ?! Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #42
No pink guns allowed sarisataka Jul 2012 #47
god forbid! Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #48
Username bongbong Jul 2012 #56
Hey, Manly! One good Post deserved Another. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #57
Your mama bongbong Jul 2012 #58
oh lord. you called in the mamas. -- Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #60
I bellieve in safety first...therefore I carry. ileus Jul 2012 #24
If you decide to carry a gun, concealed or not I think you have made up your mind that you are upaloopa Jul 2012 #27
you might believe it but, to think it, is to think wrongly. sorry. Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #31
speaking for myself.. gejohnston Jul 2012 #32
I'd probably shoot or stab someone if they tried to steal my iron lung. Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #35
kind of hard to do gejohnston Jul 2012 #36
Kind of hard and rather silly... Clames Jul 2012 #46
You should put those questions to yourself first. Clames Jul 2012 #34
I put that question to myself in Viet Nam. Because of that I don't carry a gun now. upaloopa Jul 2012 #37
We all hope for the best. Clames Jul 2012 #39
I understand. I know there are DUers who are vets and carry a gun today. Just not my choice. upaloopa Jul 2012 #40
that is your choice and that is fine but, to assume that others carry daily with intent to kill Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #43
Yes I am Meiko Jul 2012 #49
"Why do gang members carry guns?" 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #50
You're shooting to save a life. ileus Jul 2012 #51
You could put it that way Meiko Jul 2012 #53
I do that also permatex Jul 2012 #54
One quibble: mvccd1000 Jul 2012 #52
 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
1. I wrestled with the decision to get my permit for about a year.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 12:52 PM
Jul 2012

I asked myself all those questions and did alot of research before I made my final decision to apply for a permit.
Damn good article, thanks for posting it.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
2. Excellent post!
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 01:06 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:24 PM - Edit history (1)

I wonder how many realize this.

"If the gun comes out of its holster, you must already have decided to kill somebody."


I might add that the moment you strap it on and walk out the door you have decided that today you are in the frame of mind to possibly kill someone or be killed.
 

TPaine7

(4,286 posts)
8. The author doesn't understand the basic principles of legal self-defense.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:03 PM
Jul 2012
If the gun comes out of its holster, you must already have decided to STOP THE THREAT POSED BY somebody USING POTENTIALLY DEADLY FORCE.


There, I fixed it.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
12. No, I think the author nailed it perfectly.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:17 PM
Jul 2012

This is one of the best posts I have seen here. All of you who carry or consider carrying would be wise to heed his advice. But hey, it's your decision and your life.

 

Spoonman

(1,761 posts)
20. Let me fix the author's article and your post:
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 03:05 PM
Jul 2012
Let’s face it, criminals are criminals, and not everyone is mentally equipped to be a criminal.

Legal Implications
If you commit a crime, you need to be prepared to accept the legal consequences that include being legally shot and killed.

Ethical Implications
When you become a criminal, you have no ethics, and thereby negate any reciprocal ethical courtesies.

Moral Implications
Are you mentally prepared to be called out as a morally corrupt shit-bag in your eulogy?

Competency Implications
If you are going to be a criminal, you need to be safe. That means you must never ever, under any circumstance, break into the home of, or attempt to rob a gun owner (good luck figuring out who is or isn't), unless you’re truly willing to surrender your meaningless worthless life.

- The End



Now your comment:

All of you who consider committing a crime, it's your decision and your life.


All fixed.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
10. Nah...
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:08 PM
Jul 2012

My baser toter instincts to have the biggest and baddest hardware jam packed full of hot loads and cowboy/cop wanna-be instincts drown out any other frame of mind mentality. So you sir are incorrect to make such assumptions on what is in other's minds.

sarisataka

(18,633 posts)
14. Agree and disagree
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:24 PM
Jul 2012
"If the gun comes out of its holster, you must already have decided to kill somebody."

This I agree in a legal sense of be prepared for the worst. Assume the person will die if you draw the gun. Practically you know you are shooting to stop the threat, no more, no less.


I might add that the moment you strap it on and walk out the door you have decided that today you are in the frame of mind to kill someone or be killed.

Here I must disagree, perhaps with the phrasing but not your meaning. You are not necessarily in the frame of mind to kill as that sounds like you are seeking the opportunity to do so.

I would say leaving the house armed means you are committed to awareness, avoidance and deescalation in order to avoid any sort of conflict. You are prepared, however, that if despite your best efforts a conflict occurs you will end it with the least force possible, even if that is lethal force.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
18. I agree, and I edited my post by adding "possibly".
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:57 PM
Jul 2012

Unless you are a hitman or deranged, I doubt you would be seeking the opportunity. Being in the frame of mind to possibly kill someone in a SD situation is normal, but it is enhanced by carrying a weapon of any kind, and further enhanced by using that weapon. What I'm saying is, if you are not prepared to kill, don't carry a gun. If you are prepared to kill, be aware of the potential consequences, and ask yourself if you are truly doing it for the right reason.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
3. You might want to edit out the snark.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jul 2012

It really isn't necessary and only serves to detract from an otherwise good post. Just sayin'.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
13. Don't you think that it's a pretty fair assumption?
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:21 PM
Jul 2012

If I decide to carry a concealed weapon outside my home, there are only 3 reasons. One, to do harm to another. Two, to defend myself, if necessary, by doing harm to another. Three, I'm crazy.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
16. You should know better than to make such assumptions.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:29 PM
Jul 2012

Now those assumptions might be particularly relevant to you carrying a concealed weapon. Not so much for others.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
17. Instead of the constant personal attacks, why don't you make a valid point?
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 02:44 PM
Jul 2012

Try addressing my points, or the OP's which I agree with 100%, and we might be able to have a conversation.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
30. Personal attacks? Another erroneous assumption.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:51 PM
Jul 2012

I did address your point (dubious it was) though I can't be held responsible if you missed it in your rush to assume a defensive posture for whatever reason...




Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
25. I find that hard to believe.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:16 PM
Jul 2012

I have few expectations, but we all have assumptions as a consequence of a functioning brain.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
26. I deduce. I don't assume
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:19 PM
Jul 2012

de·duce (d-ds, -dys) KEY

TRANSITIVE VERB:
de·duced, de·duc·ing, de·duc·es
To reach (a conclusion) by reasoning.
To infer from a general principle; reason deductively: deduced from the laws of physics that the new airplane would fly.
To trace the origin or derivation of.

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
28. Don't we all, hopefully. They are not mutually exclusive.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:48 PM
Jul 2012

I assume you are being honest in your responses. I assume your participation in this group is to contribute. I also deduce that from your previous posts. I have no similar expectations, nor assumptions from all our members.
However, let's not get bogged down in the semantics, lest we lose the point.
Change the word "ASSUMPTION" TO "DEDUCTION" in post #13. Is it a fair deduction that one of the three would apply?

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
33. You may well be right. Interesting.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:03 PM
Jul 2012

Maybe, for some, there is no intent. Could be nothing more than a mindless habit. No intent to use it if provoked. No intent to defend oneself or others when threatened. Maybe just a psychological blankie.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
38. Mindless habit?
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:17 PM
Jul 2012

Tell that to the police patrolling London with MP5 sub-machine guns and those mounting surface-to-air missiles on apartment houses. Or would you rather just ignore the inconvenient fact that police there are now heavily armed (far more so than their American counterparts during the Athen's games) in the chance of responding to a threat? Deploying military assets to perform law enforcement activities? What happened to all that civility I wonder...

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
55. Yeah you're right, as usual and right on topic.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:40 PM
Jul 2012

All those fucking Brits carrying concealed MP5 sub-machine guns and SAMs. Americans in Athens?
I give up.

Response to Tuesday Afternoon (Reply #41)

Response to Starboard Tack (Reply #28)

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
21. Real title should be
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 03:36 PM
Jul 2012

"Are You Too Scared To Walk Out Of Your 'Fortress Of Solitude' Without Manly Guns?"

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
56. Username
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:01 PM
Jul 2012

Wow, a joke about my screenname. I NEVER get that from gun-religionists. What a creative bunch you guys are, with such substantive posts.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
57. Hey, Manly! One good Post deserved Another.
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:08 PM
Jul 2012

Doncha think. If you dish it out ya better be ready to take it, Manly.

 

bongbong

(5,436 posts)
58. Your mama
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 05:12 PM
Jul 2012

> If you dish it out ya better be ready to take it.

Yeah, I guess my rofl meant I was all hurt & stuff.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
27. If you decide to carry a gun, concealed or not I think you have made up your mind that you are
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 05:35 PM
Jul 2012

willing to kill someone.


My question is this, how hard is it for various people to come to that kind of decision? Is it ok to kill to protect your property? Is it ok to kill to protect someone else's life? Is it ok to kill to protect your own life?

Do gun carriers go through this thought process? Or are there those who want to carry a gun for some other reason and would hesitate to use it if need be?

I'm not asking about law abiding citizens only. Why do gang members carry guns?

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
35. I'd probably shoot or stab someone if they tried to steal my iron lung.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:09 PM
Jul 2012

Reminds me of an incident in NYC about 30 years ago. This guy in a wheelchair was mugged on Houston Street and thrown from his wheelchair. The mugger ran off. As the victim was crawling along the sidewalk to reclaim his wheelchair, a pickup truck stopped, guy jumped out and threw the wheelchair in the back and drove away. It's a sick fucking world.

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
34. You should put those questions to yourself first.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:08 PM
Jul 2012
My question is this, how hard is it for various people to come to that kind of decision?


Impossible to answer since it is uniquely dependent on the individual.

Is it ok to kill to protect your property?


Depends. Someone stealing a yard decorations, I probably wouldn't. Someone breaking into my house, certainly a serious option.

Is it ok to kill to protect someone else's life?


Yes.

Is it ok to kill to protect your own life?


Absolutely.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
37. I put that question to myself in Viet Nam. Because of that I don't carry a gun now.
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:15 PM
Jul 2012

I'm counting on the odds being that I won't be in that situation again.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
43. that is your choice and that is fine but, to assume that others carry daily with intent to kill
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 06:33 PM
Jul 2012

is to base your thought process on a past conception. This is not Nam. CCW is not INTENT to harm. that thought process would never stand in court.

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
49. Yes I am
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 07:45 PM
Jul 2012

I will use deadly force if necessary to protect myself from death or serious injury. I can't speak for every gun owner, every persons reasons for carrying a gun are different. If you look at the number of CCW permits vs the actual number who carry there is somewhat of a gap. For those who have a permit but choose not to carry a gun I would suggest that they are undecided on whether or not they are willing to use the gun if necessary. You have to be sure you are willing to take a life if necessary, if not then why carry a gun?

For myself I would never kill another person in defense of property. If someone were stealing my truck I wouldn't shoot them to stop the theft. If someone breaks into my home I have no idea why they are there. Maybe they are there just to steal, how am I suppose to know. If an intruder is unarmed and I have a gun I see no reason to shoot someone just because I can. If the intruder is armed then that is a different matter, I will defend myself.

You have to be mentally prepared if you are going to carry a gun, some people take the responsibility too lightly. Certainly there are people out there who carry guns because it makes them feel tough and they have watched too many movies and too much TV. I would even say that there are some who carry just hoping they can use the gun for one reason or another, fortunately these people are few are far between. With most of these wanna be tough guys it is bravado and most never follow up on their little dreams, unfortunately some do. It is a fact that some people should not own a gun let alone carry it but it is hard to weed these people out, how are you going to do it? I once knew a guy who carried a gun all the time and it was never loaded. I asked him why he did it and he told me it made him feel good, who knows what some people are thinking.

Why do gang members carry guns? To kill people with I suppose. Gangs represent the very worst of society. They are vicious killers who show no remorse. They are drug dealers, addicts, rapists and murderers. They run with the worst of the worst. Not all gang members are armed but many are. If I ran with these types of people I guess I would see a gun as a necessity as well. They also use guns to intimidate the local population and the police. I suppose there are some who will make the comparison that lawful gun owners are the same as gang members since both carry guns, such an assertion would be ludicrous.

In all the years I have carried a gun I have never had to shoot anyone and of that I am thankful. I have drawn my weapon twice in defense. In both instances the individuals were armed with a knife. In both cases I was unable to retreat and felt my life was in danger. By state law I could have shot both of these individuals and walked, since they were armed it would have been self defense. When I drew my gun I was prepared to use it, I removed the safety and could have fired, why didn't I? I am not in a hurry to kill someone for one thing and I could tell by the persons demeanor that they knew they were about to get shot, lost their nerve and retreated.The gun itself was enough to defuse the situation, killing the man was not necessary. I called the police and gave them a report and that was it. The second incident was about the same.

I don't carry a gun to feel tough or because I am afraid. I carry it so I can defend myself if needed, to me it's a tool. Because of physical limitations I am unable to adequately defend myself if the need should arise so I carry a gun.

 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
50. "Why do gang members carry guns?"
Thu Jul 12, 2012, 08:17 PM
Jul 2012

Good question. Since they should know, from a brief perusal of the internet, that it's basically guaranteed that they (as criminals) can just snatch away any gun pointed at them and use it on the owner.

It is literally impossible for a law abiding citizen to not have a gun simply taken away from him/her by a criminal.

So why bother?

 

Meiko

(1,076 posts)
53. You could put it that way
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 11:09 AM
Jul 2012

I do not walk around with a chip on my shoulder looking for someone to shoot, even though it has been suggested that that's exactly what CCW holders do. I practice avoidance and situational awareness, it keeps me out of trouble.

 

permatex

(1,299 posts)
54. I do that also
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 11:12 AM
Jul 2012

when OC, hell, even if I'm not carrying, I still practice situational awareness, comes from a lifetime of having to know whats going on around me at all times.

mvccd1000

(1,534 posts)
52. One quibble:
Fri Jul 13, 2012, 12:25 AM
Jul 2012

The author wrote:

Concealed means concealed…in every possible sense. If you can’t conceal it, do not tote it. You aren’t trying to impress anyone by carrying. Your ethical posture has to be above reproach when carrying.


This must have been written by someone from the northeast. Why conceal? Of what deterrent value is that? Sure, if you're hoping to spring your "tactical advantage" on someone, concealed is great. Otherwise, I'm all for open carry. Let some lowlife who's on the fence about whether to commit a robbery tonight see the openly carried pistol and decide there are other, easier, targets out there somewhere. I'll be home in bed without ever interacting with him, while the concealed carrier will still be explaining to the police why he had to draw his hidden weapon.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Are You Too Stupid For Co...