Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,891 posts)
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:49 PM Jul 2012

NY, NJ lawmakers want ammunition sales restricted

Source: Associated Press

NY, NJ lawmakers want ammunition sales restricted

AP foreign, Tuesday July 31 2012

VERENA DOBNIK

Associated Press= NEW YORK (AP) — Ten days after the Colorado movie theater massacre, federal lawmakers introduced a bill that would effectively ban people like suspect James Holmes from buying thousands of rounds of ammunition by mail or online.

"It's time to close the loophole that's allowing killers — deranged, insane — and even terrorists to buy ammunition online," said U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey.

He was joined Monday on the steps of City Hall in Manhattan by U.S. Rep. Carolyn McCarthy of New York to announce the Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

Lautenberg said he and McCarthy, both Democrats, were "on a mission": to ensure the safety of all Americans by passing legislation that would close loopholes in gun laws allowing people like the suspect in the Aurora, Colo., shootings "to anonymously stockpile for mass murder."

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/feedarticle/10363341
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NY, NJ lawmakers want ammunition sales restricted (Original Post) Eugene Jul 2012 OP
Thanks discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2012 #1
But, wait... Oneka Jul 2012 #5
Loopholes are bad, right? NewMoonTherian Jul 2012 #6
I found this loophole... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2012 #13
They are on a mission.. virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #2
I believe that if President Obama is defeated by a very narrow margin in November Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #9
State issue, not Federal ProgressiveProfessor Jul 2012 #3
I'm afraid my memory must be slipping, because I'm unable to recollect an example petronius Jul 2012 #4
Reid is going to dope slap them into reality... -..__... Jul 2012 #7
I fail to see the point xxenderwigginxx Jul 2012 #8
lol Missycim Jul 2012 #17
Don't do it!!!! Oneka Jul 2012 #18
I'd rather loopholes were HALO141 Jul 2012 #24
Do they somehow think he fired all 6,000 rounds? EX500rider Jul 2012 #10
So exactly what are the worried about? ileus Jul 2012 #11
Our law makers LOOOOVE xxenderwigginxx Jul 2012 #12
Here's a question: discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2012 #14
Keep banging rDigital Jul 2012 #15
Welcome :) n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2012 #22
Loophole, how the fuck is it a loophole. Online store, buy from online store, what's the problem? rl6214 Jul 2012 #16
Lawmakers want to limit death spewer feed. ileus Jul 2012 #19
Loophole doesn't mean what Lautenberg he thinks it means. aikoaiko Jul 2012 #20
He used about $40 worth of ammunition available at any Walmart or gun shop in America. OneTenthofOnePercent Jul 2012 #21
- or - 5 ileus Jul 2012 #23
Yeah, and how many rounds of ammo did Sideshow Bob expend? krispos42 Aug 2012 #25

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
1. Thanks
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 08:54 PM
Jul 2012

It's reassuring to know that our legislators are hard at work wasting time and money on restrictions that serve no useful purpose.

Oneka

(653 posts)
5. But, wait...
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:07 PM
Jul 2012

By god, Frank Lautenberg has discovered another LOOPHOLE!!!!!.

Why is it , that these lawmakers who want nothing more than to limit, or eradicate the rights of every American, can always find some regular mundane piece of business and somehow turn it into a LOOPHOLE?


NewMoonTherian

(883 posts)
6. Loopholes are bad, right?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:09 PM
Jul 2012

Nobody likes getting screwed over by a loophole. It's a great way to describe something you want to attack.

Simo 1939_1940

(768 posts)
9. I believe that if President Obama is defeated by a very narrow margin in November
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:37 PM
Jul 2012

that it would be inaccurate to say that his actions w/regard to gun restriction caused the defeat, since there would be multiple factors at play.

I do believe that it would be accurate to assert that but for his bad decisions since '08 re. firearms and previous statements he'd likely have won.

While I don't believe that Republicons are celebrating the Aurora shooting, I certainly believe that they are celebrating our response to it.

I'm feeling more distressed by the day as the shrill, uninformed BS ushers forth from our side - from citizens and politicians alike.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
4. I'm afraid my memory must be slipping, because I'm unable to recollect an example
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:07 PM
Jul 2012

where controls on internet and/or bulk ammo sales would have prevented or even moderately impeded an act of crime or violence. Someone help me out, here...

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
7. Reid is going to dope slap them into reality...
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:15 PM
Jul 2012
Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) made it clear last week that the Senate will not debate gun control before the election and even beyond that


http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/30/13036595-democrats-announce-bill-to-limit-online-ammunition-sales?lite

 

xxenderwigginxx

(146 posts)
8. I fail to see the point
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:24 PM
Jul 2012

So since Holmes would have been unable under this legislation to purchase ammo online, he would have gone to any gun store and purchased 6,000 rounds without question or I.D. (unless they doubted his age)
I don't know about you, but my "increased feeling of safety" meter just went to warm and fuzzy. Thanks NJ lawmakers

Oneka

(653 posts)
18. Don't do it!!!!
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 06:39 AM
Jul 2012

you will be falling for the second oldest trick in the book. The first of which we all know, is

"never go in against a Cicilian, when death is on the line".

But only slightly less well known, is::: never fall for the "warm and fuzzy, LOOPHOLE!!!!

EX500rider

(10,844 posts)
10. Do they somehow think he fired all 6,000 rounds?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:42 PM
Jul 2012

All he needed was 2 boxes of 50...having 5,900 back at the apt didn't matter squat

ileus

(15,396 posts)
11. So exactly what are the worried about?
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:45 PM
Jul 2012

It's not "massive" amounts of ammo how many people have fired more than 100 rounds in a spree killing?

So what are they really worried about when they feel the need to limit your ammo?

 

xxenderwigginxx

(146 posts)
12. Our law makers LOOOOVE
Mon Jul 30, 2012, 09:48 PM
Jul 2012

to appear to be "doing something" without actually accomplishing anything. Its called theater

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,479 posts)
14. Here's a question:
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 12:53 AM
Jul 2012

If all of Congress is in a room with James Holmes who has a gun, How many rounds of ammo will they vote to let him have? I'm guessing the number will be less than 535.

Next: How many guns and rounds of ammo will they allow each other to have while being sequestered with Mr Holmes and his arms? IMHO, that would be a good place to start for everyone.

 

rl6214

(8,142 posts)
16. Loophole, how the fuck is it a loophole. Online store, buy from online store, what's the problem?
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:22 AM
Jul 2012

This, by the way is after providing proof of age and an ID.

 

OneTenthofOnePercent

(6,268 posts)
21. He used about $40 worth of ammunition available at any Walmart or gun shop in America.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 08:48 AM
Jul 2012

The killer fired about 100 rounds.. (?) That's only a few boxes of cheap ammo easily avaibale @ ny gun shop or Walmart in the nation. You don't need internet sales to get that, especially when you consider he got his guns from a local gunshop.

The thought that this weak bill could have prevented this tradgedy indicates Lautenberg must have an IQ of about 75.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
25. Yeah, and how many rounds of ammo did Sideshow Bob expend?
Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:01 AM
Aug 2012

He fired a few shots from the AR-15 until the gun jammed, then he emptied the shotgun (no more than 8 rounds) and a Glock handgun.

So he fired about 30 from the AR-15, 8 from the shotgun, and 15 from the Glock. Total: 53.

Sorry, guys, but rifle ammo comes in boxes of 20 rounds each, buckshot in 5-shell boxes, and handgun ammo in boxes of between 20 and 50.

Buying 2 boxes of rifle ammo, 2 boxes of buckshot, and a box of handgun ammo wouldn't even be a blip on the radar.


You don't need massive quantities of ammo to perform a mass shooting.

Our legislators are obsessing over stockpiles of ammunition when the last time there actually was a sustained siege against law enforcement was Waco and the Branch Davidians. It's not an issue. The people stock up are either end-of-the-world fanatics, at which point I'd rather they spend their money stockpiling ammo than donating to Republicans or their think tanks for their church; or they're sport shooters buying in bulk.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»NY, NJ lawmakers want amm...