How Michael Flynn's Disdain for Limits Led to a Legal Quagmire
Source: New York Times
How Michael Flynns Disdain for Limits Led to a Legal Quagmire
By NICHOLAS CONFESSORE, MATTHEW ROSENBERG and DANNY HAKIM JUNE 18, 2017
WASHINGTON Michael T. Flynn was a man seething and thwarted. In the summer of 2014, after repeatedly clashing with other Obama administration officials over his management of the Defense Intelligence Agency and what he saw as his unheeded warnings about the rising power of Islamic militants Mr. Flynn was fired, bringing his military career to an abrupt end.
Mr. Flynn decided that the militarys loss would be his gain: He would parlay his contacts, his disdain for conventional bureaucracy, and his intelligence career battling Al Qaeda into a lucrative business advising cybersecurity firms and other government contractors. Over the next two years he would sign on as a consultant to nearly two dozen companies, while carving out a niche as a sought-after author and speaker and ultimately becoming a top adviser to President Trump.
[font size=1]
-snip-[/font]
But instead of lofting him into the upper ranks of Beltway bandits, where some other top soldiers have landed, his foray into consulting has become a legal and political quagmire, driven by the same disdain for boundaries that once propelled his rise in the military. His business ties are now the subject of a broad inquiry by a special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible collusion with Trump associates. That investigation now includes work Mr. Flynn did for Russian clients and for a Turkish businessman with ties to that countrys president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Mr. Flynn sometimes seemed to be trying to achieve through business what he could not accomplish in government. He believed that the United States was engaged in a world war against Islamist militants, and that Washingtons national security elite had so thoroughly politicized the countrys intelligence agencies that few left in government could see the threat. The United States, he believed, needed to take a tougher line against the Islamic State, and it needed to cultivate Russia as an ally in the fight.
[font size=1]
-snip-[/font]
Read more:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/18/us/politics/michael-flynn-intel-group-trump.html