Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2019, 07:23 AM Jun 2019

House panel approves $733B defense policy bill

https://thehill.com/policy/defense/448311-house-panel-approves-733b-defense-policy-bill

House panel approves $733B defense policy bill

By Rebecca Kheel - 06/13/19 07:00 AM EDT

The House Armed Services Committee early Thursday advanced its $733 billion defense policy bill. The committee voted 33-24 largely along party lines to send the fiscal year 2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) to the House floor. Republican Reps. Elise Stefanik (N.Y.) and Don Bacon (Neb.) voted with Democrats in support of the bill.

While Democrats hold a majority in the House, a lack of Republican support could become an issue when the bill comes to the floor if progressive Democrats balk at its $733 billion price tag.

Republicans voted against the bill in committee after losing amendment votes on several of their priorities, including increasing the dollar value of the bill and nuclear issues.

Speaking to reporters after the vote, the top Republican on the committee, Rep. Mac Thornberry (Texas), cited the funding and nuclear issues, as well as provisions related to Guantanamo Bay, as negatives that outweighed positives in the bill. Thornberry offered an amendment to increase the topline to $750 billion, but was voted down, 27-30. Rep. Elaine Luria (D-Va.) voted with Republicans.

Republicans argue a $750 billion defense budget -- the amount requested by the Trump administration -- is needed to counter Russia and China, citing testimony from defense officials on the need for a 3 to 5 percent year-over-year budget increase.

“Everything in here is core responsibility of this committee,” Thornberry said of his amendment. “For us to authorize an amount less than the administration requested, less than the consistent testimony we have received, less than the Senate Armed Services Committee puts us at a disadvantage” in upcoming budget negotiations.

Democrats, though, highlight that the Pentagon planned to request $733 billion until late last year after defense hawks and former Defense Secretary James Mattis convinced President Trump to go higher.

“It’s worth noting that $733 billion, but about $17 billion, is the largest defense budget ever,” committee Chairman Adam Smith
(D-Wash.) said, adding that “$733 billion is not a small amount of money.”
(snip)
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»House panel approves $733...