Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,688 posts)
Tue Mar 7, 2023, 10:22 AM Mar 2023

WP EXCLUSIVE Former top U.S. admiral cashes in on nuclear sub deal with Australia

WP EXCLUSIVE

Former top U.S. admiral cashes in on nuclear sub deal with Australia

By Craig Whitlock and Nate Jones
March 7, 2023 at 7:00 a.m. EST



Gen. Mark A. Milley, left, the Army chief of staff, speaks with Adm. John M. Richardson, the chief of naval operations, prior to testifying before the House Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in April 2017. (Jose Luis Magana/AP)

In its quest to build nuclear-powered submarines, the government of Australia recently hired a little-known, one-person consulting firm from Virginia: Briny Deep. ... Briny Deep, based in Alexandria, Va., received a $210,000 part-time contract in late November to advise Australian defense officials during their negotiations to acquire top-secret nuclear submarine technology from the United States and Britain, according to Australian contracting documents. U.S. public records show the company is owned by John M. Richardson, a retired four-star U.S. admiral and career submariner who headed the U.S. Navy from 2015 to 2019.

Richardson, who declined to comment, is the latest former U.S. Navy leader to cash in on the nuclear talks by working as a high-dollar consultant for the Australian government, a pattern that was revealed in a Washington Post investigation last year. His case brings to a dozen the number of retired officers and former civilian leaders from the U.S. Navy whom Australia has employed as advisers since the nuclear talks began in September 2021, documents show.

The former U.S. Navy officials are profiting from a web of sources with sometimes divergent interests. One retired U.S. admiral charges $4,000 per day to consult for the Australian government while simultaneously advising other foreign defense clients and collecting his U.S. military pension, according to records obtained by The Post under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The overlapping arrangements cast doubt on whether the U.S. consultants can provide impartial advice and raise questions about whose interests they are representing, said Jordon Steele-John, a member of the Australian Senate whose Green Party opposes the nuclear talks and has been critical of the government’s dependence on American advisers. “If you’re on the payroll of a foreign government, your advice is by definition not independent,” he said.

{snip}


By Craig Whitlock
Craig Whitlock is an investigative reporter who specializes in national security issues. He has covered the Pentagon, served as the Berlin bureau chief and reported from more than 60 countries. He joined The Washington Post in 1998. Twitter https://twitter.com/craigmwhitlock

By Nate Jones
Nate Jones is the FOIA director for The Washington Post where he works with reporters to target documents to request, appeal and sue for. Twitter https://twitter.com/FOIANate
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»WP EXCLUSIVE Former top U...