Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:58 AM Mar 2016

American general admits the 'F-35' is actually 3 different fighter jets

http://theweek.com/articles/612658/american-general-admits-f35-actually-3-different-fighter-jets



American general admits the 'F-35' is actually 3 different fighter jets
David Axe
March 22, 2016

The whole idea behind the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter was for it to be, you know, joint. That is to say, the same basic plane would work for the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps and foreign countries.

Lockheed Martin is designing the F-35 to meet all the requirements of all three U.S. military branches from the outset, with — in theory — only minor differences between the Air Force's F-35A, the Marines' F-35B, and the Navy's F-35C.

The variants were supposed to be 70-percent common. But Lt. Gen. Christopher Bogdan, head of the JSF program office, told a seminar audience on Feb. 10 that the three F-35 models are only 20- to 25-percent common, mainly in their cockpits.

In other words, the F-35 is actually three different warplanes. The F-35, F-36, and F-37.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
American general admits the 'F-35' is actually 3 different fighter jets (Original Post) unhappycamper Mar 2016 OP
And NONE of them work. hobbit709 Mar 2016 #1
It is actually zero fighter jets. nt longship Mar 2016 #2
The airframes and landing gear awoke_in_2003 Mar 2016 #3
 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
3. The airframes and landing gear
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 10:58 PM
Mar 2016

on the Navy versions have to be beefed up considerably to be able to take the abuse of carrier landings.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»American general admits t...