Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Pentagon report reveals confusion among U.S. troops over Afghan mission
Source: Reuters
World | Mon May 9, 2016 2:11am EDT
Pentagon report reveals confusion among U.S. troops over Afghan mission
KABUL | BY JOSH SMITH
Amid fierce fighting after the Taliban captured the northern Afghan city of Kunduz last year, U.S. special forces advisers repeatedly asked their commanders how far they were allowed to go to help local troops retake the city.
They got no answer, according to witnesses interviewed in a recently declassified, heavily redacted Pentagon report that lays bare the confusion over rules of engagement governing the mission in Afghanistan.
As the Taliban insurgency gathers strength, avoiding enemy fire has become increasingly difficult for advisers, who have been acting as consultants rather than combatants since NATO forces formally ceased fighting at the end of 2014.
In the heat of the battle, lines can be blurred, and the problem is not exclusive to Afghanistan: questions have arisen over the role of U.S. troops in Iraq after a U.S. Navy SEAL was killed by Islamic State this month.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Pentagon report reveals confusion among U.S. troops over Afghan mission
KABUL | BY JOSH SMITH
Amid fierce fighting after the Taliban captured the northern Afghan city of Kunduz last year, U.S. special forces advisers repeatedly asked their commanders how far they were allowed to go to help local troops retake the city.
They got no answer, according to witnesses interviewed in a recently declassified, heavily redacted Pentagon report that lays bare the confusion over rules of engagement governing the mission in Afghanistan.
As the Taliban insurgency gathers strength, avoiding enemy fire has become increasingly difficult for advisers, who have been acting as consultants rather than combatants since NATO forces formally ceased fighting at the end of 2014.
In the heat of the battle, lines can be blurred, and the problem is not exclusive to Afghanistan: questions have arisen over the role of U.S. troops in Iraq after a U.S. Navy SEAL was killed by Islamic State this month.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-afghanistan-military-idUSKCN0Y00G0
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
or the infamous arrogance of going into the sacred lands of the Indigenous Peoples and learning that the fight was more then one planned-----------------the American experience has always been laid out that this country always has a plan, even if if it means supporting a liar(s) program from 2001 to save face----------------------- even today as we speak and hear
Honk-----------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
