Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Sun Jul 5, 2015, 08:52 AM Jul 2015

Sen. Murray aims to block VA policy that would cut off benefits to some former troops

http://www.thenewstribune.com/2015/06/29/3882440/sen-murray-aims-to-block-va-policy.html

Sen. Murray aims to block VA policy that would cut off benefits to some former troops
By Adam Ashton
Staff writerJune 29, 2015

Sen. Patty Murray on Monday visited Tacoma to announce a new bill that would force the Department of Veterans Affairs to help former troops regardless of whether they left the military with an honorable discharge.

Murray met with groups in Tacoma that work with homeless veterans. She is pushing to protect vulnerable veterans from losing VA-funded assistance they’ve been receiving through local nonprofit organizations around the country.

They’re at risk because a VA legal review last year concluded that veterans who spent fewer than 24 months in uniform or who received a less than honorable discharge may not be entitled to any government benefits connected to their military service. In most cases, those veterans are not eligible for VA benefits.

That’s unacceptable to Murray and other advocates who worry about closing doors to former troops who were disciplined after experiencing traumatic events, such as combat or sexual assaults.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sen. Murray aims to block VA policy that would cut off benefits to some former troops (Original Post) unhappycamper Jul 2015 OP
Don't blame the VA. Blame the Congress that writes the rules and funds -rather, underfunds-.... marble falls Jul 2015 #1
That's crazy anyone would think that DashOneBravo Jul 2015 #2
It is crazy. I went where I was ordered. marble falls Jul 2015 #3
Draftees usually went "2 x 4", two active, four reserves. But Pres Johnson called up.... marble falls Jul 2015 #4
Thank you I didn't know. DashOneBravo Jul 2015 #5

marble falls

(57,080 posts)
1. Don't blame the VA. Blame the Congress that writes the rules and funds -rather, underfunds-....
Sun Jul 5, 2015, 09:04 AM
Jul 2015

the VA.

There are those who think because I was a submariner instead of an infantry man, I don't deserve my VA benefits.

DashOneBravo

(2,679 posts)
2. That's crazy anyone would think that
Sun Jul 5, 2015, 10:56 AM
Jul 2015

What about the guys who got drafted during Vietnam? That was a little before my time. Did those guys spend less than 24 months?

marble falls

(57,080 posts)
4. Draftees usually went "2 x 4", two active, four reserves. But Pres Johnson called up....
Sun Jul 5, 2015, 11:10 AM
Jul 2015

twenty-four thousand reservists in one day and a lot of them were in Viet Nam in a matter of a couple of days and the rest were there in a week or two.


http://www.mnroa.org/0703/Research/vnseaunits/vietnam_research_1.htm

http://articles.philly.com/1990-08-23/news/25933357_1_reserve-units-active-duty-reservists

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Sen. Murray aims to block...