HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Race & Ethnicity » African American (Group) » Those who defend the murd...

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 11:56 AM

Those who defend the murder of black people do not deserve respect, they deserve to be shunned

I hear a lot of people say that we should respect all opinions, but I don't believe that all opinions are worthy of respect. There is nothing respectable about racist opinions, nor is there anything respectable about promoting policies that harm others.

Those who come to this site to defend the murder of unarmed black men are not in the least bit worthy of respect, they are promoting a violent and racist ideology and there is no reason we should have to pretend that this dangerous ideology is a mere "difference of opinion".

I am sick of hearing racists scream about the "right to self defense" of those who murder unarmed black men, yet express absolutely zero concern for the rights of the black men who were shot.

I am sick of hearing the racists scream about an admitted killer like George Zimmerman being innocent until proven guilty while at the same time treating Trayvon Martin as guilty until proven innocent.

I am sick of seeing people being lectured about "not understanding the law" because they oppose a racist criminal justice system that punishes blacks far worse than it punishes whites.

I am sick of being told that we should not talk about race while racism continues to harm millions upon millions of Americans.

I am sick of being told that we are being uncivil for calling a racist a racist while those who express racist beliefs are not called out on their incivility.

The idea that we should respect all opinions may be good advice when it comes to opinions on matters such as musical tastes or other areas in which nobody is being harmed by another person's opinion, but it is not good advice when it comes to discussions of racism. There is no reason that we should respect racist opinions, and there is no reason that we should pretend the obviously racist opinion of someone who tries to justify gunning unarmed black men down in the streets is not actually racist.

Those who advocate for people like George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson are no better than those who advocated for lynchings in generations past. They are promoting a violent and racist ideology and it should not be tolerated by anyone.

It is an absolute shame that it is tolerated by DU.

62 replies, 7373 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 62 replies Author Time Post
Reply Those who defend the murder of black people do not deserve respect, they deserve to be shunned (Original post)
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 OP
randys1 Jan 2015 #1
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #3
randys1 Jan 2015 #4
sheshe2 Jan 2015 #40
brush Jan 2015 #2
HoosierRadical Jan 2015 #5
ybbor Jan 2015 #21
Hoyt Jan 2015 #6
Enrique Jan 2015 #7
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #8
bettyellen Jan 2015 #11
heaven05 Jan 2015 #12
Feral Child Jan 2015 #20
uponit7771 Jan 2015 #46
albino65 Jan 2015 #9
brer cat Jan 2015 #10
heaven05 Jan 2015 #13
MrScorpio Jan 2015 #14
tblue Jan 2015 #15
ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #16
ZombieHorde Jan 2015 #17
classykaren Jan 2015 #18
Greybnk48 Jan 2015 #19
George II Jan 2015 #22
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #24
Name removed Jan 2015 #27
ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #28
Name removed Jan 2015 #32
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #33
uppityperson Jan 2015 #34
heaven05 Jan 2015 #37
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #38
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #31
Skittles Jan 2015 #39
LineReply ,
blkmusclmachine Jan 2015 #23
bravenak Jan 2015 #25
gwheezie Jan 2015 #26
Name removed Jan 2015 #29
ismnotwasm Jan 2015 #30
Number23 Jan 2015 #35
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #36
sheshe2 Jan 2015 #41
ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #42
Action_Patrol Jan 2015 #45
ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #49
Action_Patrol Jan 2015 #50
ncjustice80 Jan 2015 #51
TNNurse Jan 2015 #43
AverageJoe Jan 2015 #44
Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #47
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #48
randys1 Jan 2015 #53
Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #55
JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #57
Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #59
JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #60
kwassa Jan 2015 #61
Corruption Inc Jan 2015 #52
Bjorn Against Jan 2015 #54
JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #58
JustAnotherGen Jan 2015 #62
BronxBoy Jan 2015 #56

Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:00 PM

1. Agree completely, but if I say anymore I might get sent on vacation

For cathartic purposes I type responses, truth, to posts like yours as you give me hope, then I delete them before certain people can see them, tis the only way to be safe.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randys1 (Reply #1)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:04 PM

3. I fully expect this will be alerted on

I am tired of walking on egg shells to avoid offending those who are promoting injustice however. I am more than willing to risk a hide to say what I feel needs to be said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:05 PM

4. Just dont attack white people in general, I have found that will guarantee a hide

Or imply that the police might have been behind the destruction in Ferguson..

oops, here it comes

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #3)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 01:24 AM

40. I am sure mine was alerted on as well.

Alert all they want. Truth matters!

Thank you Bjorn!

Kick

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:03 PM

2. You are absolutely right

And if I may borrow a phrase from another poster, they are shit stains on society and DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:15 PM

5. I agree 100%

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to HoosierRadical (Reply #5)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:45 PM

21. I agree 110%

At least I wish I could if it were possible.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:18 PM

6. Agree. Ticks me off to hear someone refer to these as "good shoots."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:22 PM

7. if someone defended the murder of black people

they would be banned from DU.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enrique (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:26 PM

8. Well there are a number of Zimmerman supporters on this site who have not been banned

And make no mistake about it Zimmerman is a murderer, a bad jury decision does not change that.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enrique (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:52 PM

11. I wish.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enrique (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 01:06 PM

12. excuse me

 

they haven't been yet.... ..

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enrique (Reply #7)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:17 PM

20. Where have you been?

They're all over us. Some new posters, some established.

They phrase it as if they're trying to be open-minded, but that mind is always made-up in favor of the killers.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Enrique (Reply #7)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 11:56 AM

46. No they wouldn't... that's not been my experience

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:44 PM

9. Hear, Hear!

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 12:50 PM

10. Agree 100%

It is a stain on DU that some of these people are allowed to remain and continue posting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 01:07 PM

13. Truth, big time

 

on edit: can't wait for the 'usual suspects' to arrive....

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 01:18 PM

14. Thank you. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 01:20 PM

15. Amen. Here and everywhere.

Could not agree more. Every time a black person is murdered and that murder is not prosecuted as such, I call that a lynching, and there is NO way to justify tolerating lynching. Could it be more clear? Damn, I am so tired of all this needless death. I am for ZERO tolerance. It is a national crisis and a stain on this country that absolutely must be rectified, just as much as slavery and Jim Crow were, and this godforsaken torture business done in our name.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 01:24 PM

16. Agree

Racism is a human rights violation IMO. There are individual racists, yes, but it's tolerated at a societal level--it's a societal disease. The only cure is bright, bright sunlight right on it and full acknowledgment of white responsibility not "I'm not the racist" or the contortions used to justify institutionialized and/or individual racism.

Or the cringeworthy, execrable "reverse racism" bullshit.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:06 PM

17. If someone wants to engage you with different ideas, how should they talk to you?

Do you respond better to respectful speech or disrespectful speech?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:06 PM

18. You are right

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:06 PM

19. Agree 100%! Every word. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:46 PM

22. I don't know of, nor have I seen, anyone defending the murder of black people on this site.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #22)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:57 PM

24. You must have missed the threads on George Zimmerman and Darren Wilson

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #24)


Response to Name removed (Reply #27)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 07:40 PM

28. What do YOU mean by that?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ismnotwasm (Reply #28)


Response to Name removed (Reply #32)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 07:47 PM

33. You are a disgusting racist shit stain

I just had to say that before you are rightfully banned for your racist posts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #33)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 07:50 PM

34. Good job. Looks like mirt got them

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Reply #33)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 08:06 PM

37. one of the 'usual suspects'

 

has arrived!!!! Don't sweat them. They get their jollies being stupidly engaging. They want to see what trouble and dissension they can cause. THEY ARE VERY MINUSCULE people with minds to match. Let them be who they are, it's the only way they can get recognition even if it is negative.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to heaven05 (Reply #37)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 08:13 PM

38. Don't worry I am not sweating it, it felt good to say that

I was glad to have the opportunity to tell that person what I thought of them before their departure.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Name removed (Reply #27)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 07:44 PM

31. Yes, they did murder and the racists who try to defend it disgust me

I know the racists like to refer to it as "justifiable homicide" but there is nothing justifiable about it. In generations past the racists also referred to lynching as "justifiable homicide" but it was murder, and the Zimmerman defenders of today are every bit as racist as the lynching defenders of the past.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to George II (Reply #22)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 10:26 PM

39. plenty of gun humpers believe Zimmerman's ridiculous story

it is SICKENING

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 02:55 PM

23. ,

 

,

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 03:18 PM

25. It is a shame.

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 05:14 PM

26. It is hard to believe on a dem site

It's bad enough that those opinions show up in GD but it's disgusting in AA.
This isn't a game or glib banter. This is about poc being killed and the murderers in plain view getting away with it. and then the detached smirking that follows. Disgusting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gwheezie (Reply #26)


Response to Name removed (Reply #29)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 07:42 PM

30. Yes it is.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 07:55 PM

35. Fabulous post.

I am sick of seeing people being lectured about "not understanding the law" because they oppose a racist criminal justice system that punishes blacks far worse than it punishes whites.


So nice to see that there are still some that get it here because lately, it is glaringly apparent that there are veritable SLEW that don't get it and are making no intention of doing so.

I'd also add to your list "I am sick of seeing people being called "social justice warriors" for daring to think that issues that affect minorities are every bit as important and are very much ingrained with economic issues. The concept of "trickle down justice" (coined ever so brilliantly by freshwest in another thread) is counter productive, because the idea that we'll get around to fixing things for poc after white people have gotten their economic situations straightened out is racist, offensive and tone deaf to the extreme."

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Number23 (Reply #35)

Sun Jan 4, 2015, 08:06 PM

36. Thanks, I am a proud Social Justice Warrior

I agree with what you are saying, but rather than get upset about the accusation of being a Social Justice Warrior I embrace it.

Fighting for social justice is something to be proud of, and I will not let them shame me with a term that should be viewed in a positive way.

I agree that Freshwest's phrase "trickle down justice" is brilliant.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 01:31 AM

41. Holy batman!

You may silence some very important voices here!

Sigh~

Keep it up. Good job. Damn good job.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:36 AM

42. K & R. They make silent threada for dead cops and cry about "due process"

But where was Trayvon Martins due process? Vonderrit Meyers? Eric Garners? Chris Dorners? Tamir Rices? All people executed with no "due process".

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ncjustice80 (Reply #42)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 11:18 AM

45. Are you seriously defending

Chris Dorner? He wrote a manifesto and then hunted people's families

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Action_Patrol (Reply #45)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:25 PM

49. Not defending anyones violent actions. I feel he was executed when a white man would have been

Captured.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ncjustice80 (Reply #49)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:28 PM

50. strongly disagree

You're certainly entitled to your opinion though

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Action_Patrol (Reply #50)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:29 PM

51. Fair enough.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 10:55 AM

43. I completely agree with your position.

I do not want to read their hateful and ignorant posts.

However, I fear they will remain quiet and sneak their hate into other venues while lurking here and twisting what is said by actual decent human beings. It is just a thought.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 11:08 AM

44. Truth

I agree 100 percent with this post. Thank you for stating the problem with such clarity and eloquence.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 12:32 PM

47. I couldn't agree more.

Defending the murder of anyone is a horrible thing to do.

But when folks like Jimmy Carter say that they believe the jury "made the right decision based on the evidence presented", that's not really "defending murder", is it?

Former president Jimmy Carter said the jury in the George Zimmerman trial "made the right decision" and agrees with President Obama that Americans should respect its judgment.

......

"It's not a moral question," he continued, "it was a legal question and the American law requires that the jury listens to the evidence presented."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/07/17/george-zimmerman-trayvon-martin-jimmy-carter/2524809/


I do not believe that this statement means that Jimmy Carter is a racist who deserves to be shunned.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #47)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 12:55 PM

48. I think Jimmy Carter is dead wrong on this one, but he was not defending murder

He was defending the court system, he was not justifying Zimmerman's actions. I personally believe our legal system is filled with injustice and needs to be changed but I don't view everyone who defends it as a racist.

Those who justify Zimmerman's action and demonize Trayvon Martin on the other hand, they are racists who are defending murder. They are disgusting people who need to be shunned.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #47)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:38 PM

53. Hmm, interesting post here..almost as if you want to do EXACTLY what the OP is complaining about...

Almost as if you didnt hear or see the AfAm members expressing their disgust with people who would make any argument defending same...

So were Eric Garner or Michael Brown or Trayvon Martin or Jordan Davis or John Crawford (Target) murdered?

Any of them?

Were there any "good shootings" on this list?

I am asking you since you are the one who went out of your way to post something that made me think your answer to this question would be maybe the most interesting...

Or I could make sure there is NO chance of getting a "hide" today and I could just ignore your comment, but I am not going to do that, today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to randys1 (Reply #53)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 06:16 PM

55. I think the point is that Jimmy Carter was not "defending the murder" of Trayvon Martin.

There is a big difference between "defending the murder" of someone and understanding how, given the witness testimony and forensic evidence, that the jury could not conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of murder.

As another example, most people believe that OJ Simpson murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, but many of us also believe that the presence of the racist cop Mark Furhman on the investigation team introduced enough reasonable doubt to justify the "not guilty" verdict. Does this mean that we are "defending the murders" of Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman? Of course not.

Benjamin Franklin stated that "it is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer". And yes, it is frustrating to see people like George Zimmerman and OJ Simpson escape justice. But such frustrations are inevitable given the requirement in our legal system to prove the guilt of a defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.

And there is no need to be concerned about getting a "hide"; your posts have been most civil.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #55)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:31 PM

57. All The way back to 1995 n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JustAnotherGen (Reply #57)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:54 PM

59. Some of the best DUers have been known to cite the OJ Simpson case in Zimmerman threads.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3646791

Yes, the OJ case was a few years ago, but as your post shows, it still has relevance today.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #59)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 08:05 PM

60. Medical Examiner told To shut up even though he had proof Zimmerman was the aggressor

Last edited Mon Jan 12, 2015, 02:53 PM - Edit history (1)

JustAnotherGen (14,223 posts)
130. No one is asking for Federal Charges for murder

This is a Civil Rights action - and IF Dr. Bao proves to be truthful - it goes right up to the District Attorney. It would fun to see that vapid, ditzy, twinkie sitting her ass in the defendants chair in a civil case.


Oh - and I'd like to think of it just like the OJ Simpson case. . . .


And - he really needs to stay away from black men. Seriously. He was found 'innocent' - but he can't go near a single member of my family. He's not good enough to be around us.

I have a RIGHT to think he's too wet to step on and too low to kick just like I think that about Sarah Palin. He's no different to me than that worthless person. Or Ted Cruz. Or - you get my point right?

And you have to understand that ALL people don't have to have the EXACT same opinion. The world would suck hairy balls if we ALL had to think the exact same thing.

"Dear America - Fuck You" Love - A Black Woman In America who knows PRECISELY what you are


Funny - I feel dirty. Ewww. Yuck. Ick.


ETA - What I responded to:

Nye Bevan (18,621 posts)

59. Some of the best DUers have been known to cite the OJ Simpson case in Zimmerman threads.







http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3646791

Yes, the OJ case was a few years ago, but as your post shows, it still has relevance today.


Reply to this post

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Nye Bevan (Reply #55)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 11:55 PM

61. What constitutes reasonable doubt might vary.

"Reasonable" is not necessarily a universal concept.

Black communities and white communities have very different experiences with police forces, and "reasonable" is based on what has happened in their life experience.

Different juries might arrive at different verdicts, and every lawyer out there knows that, which is powerful motivation in many lawsuits, particularly civil suits, to settle outside of court.

The idea that there is some sense of perfection in our justice system is farcical, given how many spend years in prisons, large chunks of their lives gone, through erroneous sentences. Don't give it credit where credit is not due. The possibility of huge error must give us all pause.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)


Response to Corruption Inc (Reply #52)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:38 PM

54. Yes, but that is a different thread.

Please stay on topic on this thread, but to answer your question I have indeed taken a strong stand against torturers. Here is my proof:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024837671

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Corruption Inc (Reply #52)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:40 PM

58. This is the AA Group - stay on topic

Last edited Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:55 AM - Edit history (1)

There is a progressive populist group for that to be discussed in. - Group Host

Edited to ADD - what was posted for fellow hosts -

Corruption Inc (818 posts)

52. How about those whom defend torturers?


Do you have the same feeling towards them
?


Poster has a long history of self deletes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Corruption Inc (Reply #52)

Tue Jan 6, 2015, 09:53 AM

62. I'm coming back to this -

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6045757

Corruption Inc (818 posts)

6. Sure you "Old selfish white" "cracker" "silent white racist" "white privilege" "whiny white people"

This site has become a place for a lot of people to come and target other people, not to make actual arguments. Depending on what "jury" is around at any given time, any kind of name-calling stays.

As the name-calling gets worse, the overall intellect of the site decreases so your point is understood.



Can you explain that? I guess I'm wondering why someone who believes black Americans who point out white privilege (an EXPERIENCE in AMERICA) is using a slur/attack - would ever venture into the AA Group?

I'm asking as a host. Right now, based on that post - I'm feeling like perhaps you shouldn't be posting back here and I need to bring it up to the other hosts.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Bjorn Against (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 07:29 PM

56. Fuck Em....

Don't shun them....Mock their asses

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread