Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Auggie

(31,184 posts)
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 09:44 AM Jul 2013

Bud Selig defends MLB drug program: "sport is cleaner than it's ever been."

ASSOCIATED PRESS / 7-16-13

NEW YORK -- With his staff pursuing yet another investigation into performance-enhancing drugs, Commissioner Bud Selig defended baseball's drug-testing program on the eve of the All-Star game and insisted "this sport is cleaner than it's ever been."

Selig declined to detail timing for decisions in the probe of the closed anti-aging clinic Biogenesis, accused of distributing performing-enhancing drugs. MLB could attempt to discipline former MVPs Alex Rodriguez and Ryan Braun along with other players.

Baseball began drug testing for the 2003 season, added penalties the following year, banned amphetamines in 2006 and started HGH blood testing last year. Critics said baseball didn't move quickly enough.

"People say, `Well, you were slow to react.' We were not slow to react," Selig said Monday. "In fact, I heard that this morning, and it aggravated me all over again."

MORE: http://espn.go.com/mlb/allstar13/story/_/id/9480138/bud-selig-insists-major-league-baseball-cleaner-ever-been

Slow? That's your middle name, Bud.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bud Selig defends MLB drug program: "sport is cleaner than it's ever been." (Original Post) Auggie Jul 2013 OP
I wouldn't say he was slow to react...I'd say he completely ignored it joeybee12 Jul 2013 #1
He's probably more or less correct. bluedigger Jul 2013 #2
LOL...cleaner than it's ever been. Iggo Jul 2013 #3
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
1. I wouldn't say he was slow to react...I'd say he completely ignored it
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 11:54 AM
Jul 2013

because it was good for business, and THEN was slow to act when he had to do something.

Douchebag Extraordinaire.

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
2. He's probably more or less correct.
Tue Jul 16, 2013, 02:11 PM
Jul 2013

At least in the modern pharmaceutical era post 1950. It's not easy to stay ahead of the chemists. I don't see much point in berating him for a job poorly done. He'll be gone soon enough, and we can concentrate our righteous indignation on the next guy...

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»Bud Selig defends MLB dru...