Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 04:54 AM Jan 2016

Suggestion for a new rule for secondary school, college, and pro football.

Clearly, ejections for "targeting" aren't solving the problem.

There should be a rule that, if any players are knocked out of the game by a hit applied by the other team(offense OR defense)the team causing the injury immediately forfeits the game.

Might be the only thing that stops football from reaching the point where players are actually killed on the field, which is bound to happen one of these days.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Suggestion for a new rule for secondary school, college, and pro football. (Original Post) Ken Burch Jan 2016 OP
Ha, instead of making them forfit draa Jan 2016 #1
It's another possibility. Ken Burch Jan 2016 #2
I agree with that but intent is hard to prove unless your Burficit or James Harrison. draa Jan 2016 #3
The Empire needs blood sport. Downwinder Jan 2016 #4
Hypothetical.... N_E_1 for Tennis Jan 2016 #5
Not gonna happen... Wounded Bear Jan 2016 #6
I saw a comment by a retired coach/player, Staph Jan 2016 #7

draa

(975 posts)
1. Ha, instead of making them forfit
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:01 AM
Jan 2016

I'd make them take a man off the field and play with 10 men. Each personal foul would result in another player on the bench. There would have been 6 on 6 at the end of that Pittsburg/Cincinnati playoff game.

At least with sitting a man the team will likely lose anyway and the fans get to finish watching the game (albeit a few men short).

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
2. It's another possibility.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:03 AM
Jan 2016

I'd also give fans a refund in case of the forfeit, for the record. No team should profit off of the intentional maiming of anyone on the other team.

draa

(975 posts)
3. I agree with that but intent is hard to prove unless your Burficit or James Harrison.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 05:13 AM
Jan 2016

And a forfit also cuts into contracts since many are now incentive laden instead of front loaded. It would be tough to keep people off the field who hadn't done anything wrong and have that type incentives in their contracts. The union also would have a fit. There's no way they'd sign off on that.

The best bet is suspend players for 4/8/16 games or for life for repeat offenders. That way some of those idiots couldn't hurt anyone.

N_E_1 for Tennis

(9,722 posts)
5. Hypothetical....
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jan 2016

Let's say the infraction happened on the third play of the game.
Forfeit.
Millions lost from ad revenue.
I'm not for corporations.. But that's one big reason the rule can't fly.
Stick to punishing the player. Lifetime ban?

Wounded Bear

(58,656 posts)
6. Not gonna happen...
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 11:38 AM
Jan 2016

Here's a more realistic proposal that I've often thought might work.

If a player is injured due to being 'targeted' (I know, hard to prove so to speak) and misses one or more games, the player that caused the injury is suspended for the same number of games.

Staph

(6,251 posts)
7. I saw a comment by a retired coach/player,
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jan 2016

Don Nehlen, who coached at West Virginia University in the 1980s and 1990s. He suggested that the bars on the front of the helmet be removed.

“I know football players are bigger and faster than when I played ball,” Nehlen said. “The reason is because of sophisticated weight programs. And that’s fine.

“But when I learned the game, I was taught to block and tackle with my shoulders. The reason is because there were no facemasks. Then, first, there was a single bar across your face.

“When a full facemask was introduced, it became a weapon. Now when an offensive lineman comes off the line of scrimmage, boom, they use their headgear to strike.

“If you want to get rid of concussions, take off the facemasks. Players will turn their heads and use their shoulders then.”


I don't know if it will truly make a difference, but at this point, anything is worth a try.


http://www.wvgazettemail.com/article/20160105/GZ02/160109758


Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»Suggestion for a new rule...