Religion
Related: About this forumPope Francis lambasts Catholic bishops who helped cover up child abuse
Pontiff makes strongest condemnation yet of paedophile priests and senior clergy who obfuscated rather than punished
Pope Francis waves to crowds in St Peter's Square. He met six abuse victims after he delivered his strongest condmenation yet of child abuse scandals that have rocked the church. (Photograph: Claudio Peri/EPA)
Lizzy Davies in Rome
The Guardian, Monday 7 July 2014 09.29 EDT
Leaders of the Roman Catholic church who failed to "respond adequately" to reports of child sex abuse by paedophile priests caused "even greater suffering" to their victims and will in future be held accountable, Pope Francis has said, in a clear rebuke to bishops who helped cover up the scandal and shield abusers.
In his strongest condemnation yet of the way in which the church handled its abuse crisis, Francis asked victims for forgiveness not only on account of those who had perpetrated the abuse but also those senior figures whose "sins of omission" had exacerbated the problem.
"Before God and his people, I express my sorrow for the sins and grave crimes of clerical sexual abuse committed against you. And I humbly ask forgiveness," he said. The sexual abuse of minors by priests and other men of the cloth required the church to "make reparation".
The pontiff was delivering the powerful homily at a morning mass in the Vatican before a group of six abuse victims, including two from the United Kingdom. Sixteen months into his papacy, it was his first such encounter.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/07/pope-francis-catholic-bishops-child-paedophile-abuse-priest-condemn
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)who covered up child sexual abuse?
rug
(82,333 posts)Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)the other lives down the hall.
Maybe it is just me, but pedophile protectors should not be made into saints and should not be given opulent lodgings in the Vatican.
okasha
(11,573 posts)in the Vatican. Hardly "opulent."
He's living under conditions of internal exile, otherwise known as house arrest.
Added: Francis doesn't live in "opulent lodgings," either. He has a two-room suite in the Vatican guest house and eats in the dining room with the visitors.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)as I am well aware he is far more frugal than his predecessors. You will have to show me your source that The Rat is living under "house arrest".
okasha
(11,573 posts)When you wrote "down the hall," I inferred that you meant down the hall from Francis.
Not good at posting links from my phone. Have a look at the Wiki article on Benedict XVI resignation. It states that he was moved from Castel Gandolfo so that the Vatican police force could be responsible for his security, so that his residence would not become a "place of pilgrimage" and so that he could be protected from lawsuits. Reading between the diplomatic lines, that looks to me as if the Vatican police are regulating his movements and visitors are being kept away. Ie., he's not a free man.
Even so, he's lucky. Not too long ago he would have "died peacefully in his sleep" or "had an apoplexy while praying in his garden."
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)He retains the title 'his holiness', 'pope', he has made public appearances, he still dresses in papal white.
I see no indication the Pope Emeritus is under anything but self-imposed cloister, probably to insulate himself from angry outsiders.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)For example, the Archbishop of our Diocese here, Mr. "I didn't know child rape was illegal in the 1980s", has no business being in any leadership position in the Church, or even be a dogcatcher. Why isn't he defrocked?
rug
(82,333 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)JPII, there's a fucking saint of the church that was involved in the coverup.
rug
(82,333 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,493 posts)I really hope he continues reparative actions. Church leadership need to go further.