Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:55 PM Jan 2015

Pope Francis: No Catholic need to breed like 'rabbits'

Good Roman Catholics do not need to breed like "rabbits", the Pope has said, but should practice "responsible" parenting instead.
...
Standing firm against artificial birth control, he said new life was "part of the sacrament of marriage".

But he said population experts advised three children per family.
...
He cited the case of one woman he had met who had had seven children by Caesarean section and was expecting her eighth - a pregnancy he said was irresponsible.

"She said, 'I trust in God.' But God gave us the means to be responsible," the Pope said.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-30890989

I have absolutely no idea what message he's trying to get out here. Is it just 'stop having sex after a bit'?
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pope Francis: No Catholic need to breed like 'rabbits' (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Jan 2015 OP
So the doctrine stays the same. Sex is only to have children, so relie on unreliable methods.\nt Mass Jan 2015 #1
That has never been the doctrine. rug Jan 2015 #11
I didn't think so either. cbayer Jan 2015 #12
Here's a rather prosaically titled statement from the American Catholic Bishops rug Jan 2015 #14
Say what? cbayer Jan 2015 #2
" There is only one way to ensure this and follow the rules - no vaginal sex ever. " edhopper Jan 2015 #3
I don't know. It would really serve them well to back down from their cbayer Jan 2015 #4
That edhopper Jan 2015 #15
Definitely no real assurances with the rhythm method. PotatoChip Jan 2015 #5
Those numbers aren't bad, but they sure aren't good. cbayer Jan 2015 #6
Lol! I know, right?! PotatoChip Jan 2015 #7
If one wanted to see the glass half full, one could interpret this as cbayer Jan 2015 #8
I think that may be exactly what he is trying to say. PotatoChip Jan 2015 #9
Excellent point. I suspect sex isn't the topic he is most comfortable with. cbayer Jan 2015 #10
Back atcha cbayer! PotatoChip Jan 2015 #13
A quote from 1956.... pokerfan Jan 2015 #20
Eve tempted Adam. LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #16
Except that is not the doctrine, as the document that rug linked to above states. cbayer Jan 2015 #17
How does contraception intefere with the unification of a couple? LiberalAndProud Jan 2015 #18
Oh, the whole issue of contraception is completely different. cbayer Jan 2015 #19

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
12. I didn't think so either.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 08:32 PM
Jan 2015

I thought it had the dual purpose of uniting a couple and procreating. What is the doctrine?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
14. Here's a rather prosaically titled statement from the American Catholic Bishops
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 08:41 PM
Jan 2015

It's titled the Unitive and Procreative Nature of Intercourse.

http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/natural-family-planning/catholic-teaching/upload/Unitive-and-Proc-Nature-of-Interc.pdf

I swear, if I ever leave the Catholic Church it will be because of their prose.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
2. Say what?
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 06:59 PM
Jan 2015
The Pope said he knew many ways allowed by the Catholic Church that could ensure families only had as many children as they wished.


Ensure? Like pulling out and the rhythm method? Hardly going to ensure anything. There is only one way to ensure this and follow the rules - no vaginal sex ever.

Certainly he is aware that most catholics use birth control, but he just can't acknowledge it out loud, would be my guess.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
3. " There is only one way to ensure this and follow the rules - no vaginal sex ever. "
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 07:28 PM
Jan 2015

I believe that is their most desired outcome.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
4. I don't know. It would really serve them well to back down from their
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 07:34 PM
Jan 2015

stance on this. I understand that abortificants are never going to be ok, but they really should ease up on everything else.

Why would they not want people to have sex? This never made sense to me.

PotatoChip

(3,186 posts)
5. Definitely no real assurances with the rhythm method.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 07:47 PM
Jan 2015

But it apparently works better than I had assumed. At least for women with reliably regular cycles.

Prior to googling, I guessed a 20% to 25% effectiveness rate, at best. However, here is what WebMD says:

What Is the Rhythm Method?
A woman practices the rhythm method of birth control by learning to recognize the days she is fertile and not having sex before and during those days. The rhythm method does not work for all couples. Women who have regular menstrual cycles and who are very careful about when they have sex usually find it to be effective. Women who have irregular cycles and who are not so careful often end up becoming pregnant.

How Does the Rhythm Method Work?
Aspects of the rhythm method include keeping track of changes in body temperature and vaginal discharge (fluid from the vagina) to pinpoint which days you are fertile. Ask your doctor how best to use the rhythm method.

How Effective Is the Rhythm Method?
The rhythm method is typically 75% to 87% effective.
http://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/rhythm-method


Regardless, I would not put my trust in that method if I was Catholic, and still in my childbearing years.

I think you are right about the Pope not wanting to acknowledge birth control methods out loud. Thus, the vagueness of his words.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
6. Those numbers aren't bad, but they sure aren't good.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 07:58 PM
Jan 2015

Being "very careful about when they have sex" is so appealing, isn't it?

Perhaps he is cracking the door open a little for a new position regarding birth control. That may be too much to ask for, but when the vast majority of people aren't following your rule, you might want to consider changing it.

Kind of like the legalization of MJ.

PotatoChip

(3,186 posts)
7. Lol! I know, right?!
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 08:07 PM
Jan 2015

I too hope he is opening the door for a new position on this. Or at the very least, backing off into a kind of unwritten, unspoken acceptance.

Women have enough to be worried about these days to be following such archaic rules.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
8. If one wanted to see the glass half full, one could interpret this as
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 08:14 PM
Jan 2015

saying that it's ok to not get pregnant every time you have sex. That is not such a bad thing to say, I guess.

With all the sexual misbehavior that has gone on in the catholic church, it would seem to be the height of hypocrisy to say that consenting adults shouldn't have sex for fun.

We shall see what comes of this.

PotatoChip

(3,186 posts)
9. I think that may be exactly what he is trying to say.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 08:24 PM
Jan 2015

He's being uncharacteristically ineloquent about it, though. Maybe the subject matter just has him all flustered.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
10. Excellent point. I suspect sex isn't the topic he is most comfortable with.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 08:30 PM
Jan 2015

Really nice talking to you PotatoChip.

There's a sunset calling my name. I hope to see you again.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
16. Eve tempted Adam.
Mon Jan 19, 2015, 10:03 PM
Jan 2015

I don't think we can separate the creation myth from the doctrine. Sex is for procreation.period.

I have long wondered why religions have tried to harness our most instinctive biological urge to name it as sin, except to name all of us sinners. It's a losing proposition for almost all of us, isn't it?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
17. Except that is not the doctrine, as the document that rug linked to above states.
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 11:31 AM
Jan 2015

It is also about unification of a couple, a role separate from procreation.

I never thought the catholic church made sex a sin as much as it just set up an awful lot of rules that had to be followed for it to be ok.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
18. How does contraception intefere with the unification of a couple?
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 12:38 PM
Jan 2015

When the church revises its stance on use of contraceptives, I'll have some use for words that, right now, contradict the church's practice. Most US Catholics may use contraceptives. Most Catholics worldwide do not.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
19. Oh, the whole issue of contraception is completely different.
Tue Jan 20, 2015, 12:56 PM
Jan 2015

That has to do with "sanctity of life" and not sexual activity, I think. Of course, they are intertwined, but still separate in some ways.

I do not believe your last sentence is accurate. Though it may be hard to get accurate numbers on actual usage, 78% of catholics believe in contraception in a study done in 12 countries. It tops 90% in most Latin American and European countries, but is at 40% in AFrica.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/09/catholics-church-contraception-abortion-survey


Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pope Francis: No Catholic...