Religion
Related: About this forumPope Francis: No Catholic need to breed like 'rabbits'
...
Standing firm against artificial birth control, he said new life was "part of the sacrament of marriage".
But he said population experts advised three children per family.
...
He cited the case of one woman he had met who had had seven children by Caesarean section and was expecting her eighth - a pregnancy he said was irresponsible.
"She said, 'I trust in God.' But God gave us the means to be responsible," the Pope said.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-30890989
I have absolutely no idea what message he's trying to get out here. Is it just 'stop having sex after a bit'?
Mass
(27,315 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)I thought it had the dual purpose of uniting a couple and procreating. What is the doctrine?
rug
(82,333 posts)It's titled the Unitive and Procreative Nature of Intercourse.
http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/natural-family-planning/catholic-teaching/upload/Unitive-and-Proc-Nature-of-Interc.pdf
I swear, if I ever leave the Catholic Church it will be because of their prose.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Ensure? Like pulling out and the rhythm method? Hardly going to ensure anything. There is only one way to ensure this and follow the rules - no vaginal sex ever.
Certainly he is aware that most catholics use birth control, but he just can't acknowledge it out loud, would be my guess.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)I believe that is their most desired outcome.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)stance on this. I understand that abortificants are never going to be ok, but they really should ease up on everything else.
Why would they not want people to have sex? This never made sense to me.
is a long a conversation. What do they have against sex?
Probably a whole thread worthy.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)But it apparently works better than I had assumed. At least for women with reliably regular cycles.
Prior to googling, I guessed a 20% to 25% effectiveness rate, at best. However, here is what WebMD says:
A woman practices the rhythm method of birth control by learning to recognize the days she is fertile and not having sex before and during those days. The rhythm method does not work for all couples. Women who have regular menstrual cycles and who are very careful about when they have sex usually find it to be effective. Women who have irregular cycles and who are not so careful often end up becoming pregnant.
How Does the Rhythm Method Work?
Aspects of the rhythm method include keeping track of changes in body temperature and vaginal discharge (fluid from the vagina) to pinpoint which days you are fertile. Ask your doctor how best to use the rhythm method.
How Effective Is the Rhythm Method?
The rhythm method is typically 75% to 87% effective.
http://www.webmd.com/sex/birth-control/rhythm-method
Regardless, I would not put my trust in that method if I was Catholic, and still in my childbearing years.
I think you are right about the Pope not wanting to acknowledge birth control methods out loud. Thus, the vagueness of his words.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Being "very careful about when they have sex" is so appealing, isn't it?
Perhaps he is cracking the door open a little for a new position regarding birth control. That may be too much to ask for, but when the vast majority of people aren't following your rule, you might want to consider changing it.
Kind of like the legalization of MJ.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)I too hope he is opening the door for a new position on this. Or at the very least, backing off into a kind of unwritten, unspoken acceptance.
Women have enough to be worried about these days to be following such archaic rules.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)saying that it's ok to not get pregnant every time you have sex. That is not such a bad thing to say, I guess.
With all the sexual misbehavior that has gone on in the catholic church, it would seem to be the height of hypocrisy to say that consenting adults shouldn't have sex for fun.
We shall see what comes of this.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)He's being uncharacteristically ineloquent about it, though. Maybe the subject matter just has him all flustered.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)Really nice talking to you PotatoChip.
There's a sunset calling my name. I hope to see you again.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)I bet it is gorgeous at sea right now. Enjoy that sunset!
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)I don't think we can separate the creation myth from the doctrine. Sex is for procreation.period.
I have long wondered why religions have tried to harness our most instinctive biological urge to name it as sin, except to name all of us sinners. It's a losing proposition for almost all of us, isn't it?
cbayer
(146,218 posts)It is also about unification of a couple, a role separate from procreation.
I never thought the catholic church made sex a sin as much as it just set up an awful lot of rules that had to be followed for it to be ok.
LiberalAndProud
(12,799 posts)When the church revises its stance on use of contraceptives, I'll have some use for words that, right now, contradict the church's practice. Most US Catholics may use contraceptives. Most Catholics worldwide do not.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)That has to do with "sanctity of life" and not sexual activity, I think. Of course, they are intertwined, but still separate in some ways.
I do not believe your last sentence is accurate. Though it may be hard to get accurate numbers on actual usage, 78% of catholics believe in contraception in a study done in 12 countries. It tops 90% in most Latin American and European countries, but is at 40% in AFrica.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/09/catholics-church-contraception-abortion-survey