Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,903 posts)
Fri Jun 5, 2015, 03:19 PM Jun 2015

Minnesota archdiocese faces charges over mishandling of sex abuse claims

Source: Associated Press

Minnesota archdiocese faces charges over mishandling of sex abuse claims

Associated Press in St Paul, Minnesota
Friday 5 June 2015 19.19 BST

Authorities in Minnesota are filing criminal charges against the Roman Catholic archdiocese of St Paul and Minneapolis over its handling of clergy sex abuse claims.

Prosecutors are announcing the charges at a news conference in St Paul. The charges name the archdiocese as a whole. The six counts allege the archdiocese failed to protect children.

The charges stem from the archdiocese’s handling of a case involving the Reverend Curtis Wehmeyer.

Church leaders were accused of failing to immediately report allegations of abuse by Wehmeyer, who pleaded guilty in 2012 to molesting two brothers and was sentenced to five years in prison.


http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/05/minnesota-archdiocese-sex-abuse-mishandling-charges
41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Minnesota archdiocese faces charges over mishandling of sex abuse claims (Original Post) Eugene Jun 2015 OP
Good. They can't bankrupt their way out of criminal charges. nt. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #1
You can't incarcerate a corporation either. rug Jun 2015 #2
Priests in jail Cartoonist Jun 2015 #3
Anyone in particular or all of them? rug Jun 2015 #4
All the pedophiles Cartoonist Jun 2015 #5
I see a theme. rug Jun 2015 #10
George Pell Cartoonist Jun 2015 #20
Agreed. And where do you get the idea I think there's nothing prosecuatble? rug Jun 2015 #21
By asking Cartoonist Jun 2015 #24
All the ones responsible. Wouldn't you agree? Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #7
I do. And what percentage of priests is that? rug Jun 2015 #11
All the ones involved in this specific case. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #14
That doesn't answer the question. rug Jun 2015 #16
I have no idea, nor do you. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #17
I do. Between 2% and 4%. rug Jun 2015 #18
" at least 4%" Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #23
That's simply one sorce. Others put it at 2%. rug Jun 2015 #29
The source you cited said "at least 4%". Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #34
The amount of abusers isn't shocking or unusual. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #28
That's exactly right. rug Jun 2015 #30
That, and their magical ability to shelter church wealth from judgments. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #36
Oh, I'd say the banks and corporations have much stronger mojo than that. rug Jun 2015 #37
Depends on a LOT of things. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #39
All the ones responsible. Wouldn't you agree? cleanhippie Jun 2015 #8
Is that a verbatim talking point I see? rug Jun 2015 #12
You can prosecute them though. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #6
I don't conslt with prosecutors. rug Jun 2015 #13
Good point rug, so why did you bring it up? Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #15
Because the OP is about prosecuting a corporation. rug Jun 2015 #19
yes rug, very good. See my previous post. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #22
Your previous post hardly warrants two comments. rug Jun 2015 #31
And yet here you are commenting. Warren Stupidity Jun 2015 #35
How does that make you feel, a church that is a corporation? AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #26
How does it make you feel about American Atheists Inc.? rug Jun 2015 #32
I like mixed market economies. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #38
What's its percentage of charitable expenditres versus revenue? rug Jun 2015 #40
Nobody really knows. Too many shell games in motion. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #41
Actually, corporate officers CAN be charged as well. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #27
Which is the next thread. rug Jun 2015 #33
Not yet. Still a work in progress. AtheistCrusader Jun 2015 #25
I am sick and tired of all the cover-ups Angry Dragon Jun 2015 #9

Cartoonist

(7,317 posts)
20. George Pell
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 04:51 PM
Jun 2015

And those who transferred pedophiles instead of turning them in to authorities. We'll need to build more prisons if justice were to be done.

I find it telling that you don't see anything prosecutable here.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
21. Agreed. And where do you get the idea I think there's nothing prosecuatble?
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 05:17 PM
Jun 2015

That is what is telling.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
17. I have no idea, nor do you.
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jun 2015

However all the ones who are or have been involved ought to be in jail.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
23. " at least 4%"
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 06:50 PM
Jun 2015

according to your link. The reality is that we simply don't know. We can guess. Good job though using rationalwiki. Remember that the next time you object to it as a source.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
29. That's simply one sorce. Others put it at 2%.
Sun Jun 7, 2015, 12:25 PM
Jun 2015

If you want journals, you'll find plenty through your google. It's not hard.

There are two points you're awkwardly evading:

One, the percentage of pedophiles is roughly equivalent to the general population.

Two, 95% of priests are not.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
34. The source you cited said "at least 4%".
Sun Jun 7, 2015, 01:07 PM
Jun 2015

You then arbitrarily lowered that to 2-4%. In other words, you misrepresented the source you cited. Some people would say that doing something like that is making a dishonest argument. Back-filling by claiming that there are other sources that support your claim would also be considered, by some people, at the least, disingenuous.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
28. The amount of abusers isn't shocking or unusual.
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 07:52 PM
Jun 2015

The rank and file coverup, stonewalling, and re-homing offenders in new places so they can continue to abuse, that's the main problem.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
6. You can prosecute them though.
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 08:32 AM
Jun 2015

Criminal prosecution of an entire Catholic archdiocese is rare, but not entirely unprecedented, in American courts.

An Ohio judge in 2003 convicted the Archdiocese of Cincinnati of failing to report sexually abusive priests in the 1970s and ’80s. The judge fined the archdiocese $10,000, the maximum allowed, after the archbishop entered a no-contest plea.

But the Minnesota allegations are especially stark because the sexual abuse is said to have occurred relatively recently, long after sexual misconduct by priests had been widely reported and after Catholic institutions implemented programs aimed at preventing further abuse.

“Naming the archdiocese as a corporation implicates the wrongdoing and the failure to protect children by all of the top officials, past and present,” Jeff Anderson, a lawyer in Minnesota who has represented clergy sex-abuse victims, said in a statement.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/06/us/catholic-archdiocese-in-minnesota-charged-over-sex-abuse-by-priest.html?_r=0

I guess Ramsey County prosecutor, John J. Choi should have consulted you first.

http://stmedia.startribune.com/documents/Archdiocese+of+Saint+Paul+and+Minneapolis+6.5.15.pdf

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
13. I don't conslt with prosecutors.
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 12:32 PM
Jun 2015

Diversion aside, there's nothing there about incarcerating a corporation.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
19. Because the OP is about prosecuting a corporation.
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 01:35 PM
Jun 2015


If you prefer uninformed bluster, don't let me stop you.
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
22. yes rug, very good. See my previous post.
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 06:48 PM
Jun 2015

So you brought up incarceration simply to argue that you can't incarcerate a corporation. Excellent. You have scored a mighty blow against your own argument. Generally that is considered this:

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
26. How does that make you feel, a church that is a corporation?
Sat Jun 6, 2015, 07:49 PM
Jun 2015

I know I've got funny feelings about it.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
32. How does it make you feel about American Atheists Inc.?
Sun Jun 7, 2015, 12:30 PM
Jun 2015

Last edited Sun Jun 7, 2015, 03:25 PM - Edit history (1)

Welcome to capitalist society, where everything, including thought, is a commodity.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
38. I like mixed market economies.
Sun Jun 7, 2015, 03:17 PM
Jun 2015

Being able to sell good ideas has kept me in scotch and scones my entire adult life, so, I feel pretty good about it.

The RCC must too, since it's become the wealthiest private entity on the planet. I could live quite well off a rounding error in their yearly budget.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
41. Nobody really knows. Too many shell games in motion.
Sun Jun 7, 2015, 03:33 PM
Jun 2015

The actual wealth of the RCC is, generally, considered impossible to account. I hear they're working on finance transparency though.

(Heh)

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Minnesota archdiocese fac...