Religion
Related: About this forumFt. Hood shooting suspect must shave -- or be shaved, judge rules
By Molly Hennessy-Fiske
September 6, 2012, 12:52 p.m.
A military judge in Texas ruled Thursday that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist charged in the 2009 Ft. Hood shooting rampage, must be clean-shaven before his court martial, else he will be forcibly shaved.
Army regulations ban beards, but Hasan, 41, who is still receiving military pay and benefits, objected on religious grounds, arguing that as a Muslim it would be a sin for him to shave. He appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which last week ruled that Hasan's appeal was premature because the military judge handling his case had not issued a definitive order. The court sent the case back to that judge.
Col. Gregory Gross, the military judge at Ft. Hood, issued his order Thursday after a hearing to determine whether a federal religious freedom law applied to Hasan's case. Soldiers may be granted permission to grow beards for religious reasons, and six soldiers have been allowed to do so: a rabbi, two Muslim doctors and three Sikhs, according to Army records.
But Gross ruled that the defense hadn't proved that Hasan grew a beard for sincere religious reasons, a Ft. Hood spokesman told the Los Angeles Times.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-fort-hood-nidal-hasan-beard-20120906,0,1344954.story?track=rss
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)The relevant portion starts on page 15.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)He will be found guilty beard or no.
rug
(82,333 posts)Religious belief or no, he's gone round the bend.
I hate show trials.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)Think about it.
He dedicated years to his training and to the military. He was a psychiatrist. He had a secure future after the military.
At one point he organized his life around these goals. In a flash, he committed mass murder which guaranteed his own, immediate or eventual, death. It's classic homicidal and suicidal ideation which was acted on.
You're probably thinking it was the result of eligious belief but I disagree. This type of destruction is more consistent with illness than belief. They are examing this interplay for DSM-V.
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleid=1109021
catbyte
(34,376 posts)If he's still in the military--which it seems as if he is--then he's SOL. Too damn bad. Why wasn't the beard an issue before the killing spree?
It sounds like he's just suing to alleviate boredom.