Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 04:11 PM Sep 2012

Ft. Hood shooting suspect must shave -- or be shaved, judge rules

By Molly Hennessy-Fiske
September 6, 2012, 12:52 p.m.

A military judge in Texas ruled Thursday that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist charged in the 2009 Ft. Hood shooting rampage, must be clean-shaven before his court martial, else he will be forcibly shaved.

Army regulations ban beards, but Hasan, 41, who is still receiving military pay and benefits, objected on religious grounds, arguing that as a Muslim it would be a sin for him to shave. He appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which last week ruled that Hasan's appeal was premature because the military judge handling his case had not issued a definitive order. The court sent the case back to that judge.

Col. Gregory Gross, the military judge at Ft. Hood, issued his order Thursday after a hearing to determine whether a federal religious freedom law applied to Hasan's case. Soldiers may be granted permission to grow beards for religious reasons, and six soldiers have been allowed to do so: a rabbi, two Muslim doctors and three Sikhs, according to Army records.

But Gross ruled that the defense hadn't proved that Hasan grew a beard for sincere religious reasons, a Ft. Hood spokesman told the Los Angeles Times.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-fort-hood-nidal-hasan-beard-20120906,0,1344954.story?track=rss

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
5. Frankly, I don't know why they don't consider at insanity defense.
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 07:57 PM
Sep 2012

Religious belief or no, he's gone round the bend.

I hate show trials.

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
8. Probably around the time he determined to commit mass murder.
Fri Sep 7, 2012, 10:22 AM
Sep 2012

Think about it.

He dedicated years to his training and to the military. He was a psychiatrist. He had a secure future after the military.

At one point he organized his life around these goals. In a flash, he committed mass murder which guaranteed his own, immediate or eventual, death. It's classic homicidal and suicidal ideation which was acted on.

You're probably thinking it was the result of eligious belief but I disagree. This type of destruction is more consistent with illness than belief. They are examing this interplay for DSM-V.

http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleid=1109021

catbyte

(34,376 posts)
2. Sorry, but he gave up a lot of rights when he joined the military.
Thu Sep 6, 2012, 04:18 PM
Sep 2012

If he's still in the military--which it seems as if he is--then he's SOL. Too damn bad. Why wasn't the beard an issue before the killing spree?

It sounds like he's just suing to alleviate boredom.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Ft. Hood shooting suspect...