Religious Education Should Not Be An Oxymoron

[cbayer]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-negy-phd/religion-education-_b_1886897.html

Charles Negy, Ph.D.Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Central Florida

Posted: 09/17/2012 3:50 pm

I have to wonder what the rest of the world thinks about the recent outbreaks of violence in Middle Eastern and other Muslim countries, supposedly in response to an amateur video that lampoons the Muslim icon, Mohammad. I'd also be curious to know the rest of the world's thoughts about the individuals who produced the video that sparked the violence.

For years I've been lecturing to college students about the perils of zealotry and in believing things for which there is no evidence. It never ceases to amaze me how passionate (to put it lightly) so many people are about their beliefs -- even beliefs that appear to be unsupported by evidence. The "My religion is the real religion" mentality (which I call religious bigotry) has never contributed to world peace. For example, the video that depicts Mohammad unfavorably is a classic example of religious bigotry. Was it necessary to make a video to purposely denigrate a dissimilar religion? Moreover, the Muslims who have attacked innocent Americans (e.g., our embassy personnel) for the actions of other Americans unambiguously exemplify racism. Religious bigotry mixed with racial bigotry almost always is a recipe for disaster.

Some suggest that a solution to these problems is to educate children about the importance of religious tolerance. I suppose that would be a nice start for minimizing social conflicts based on religion. But I think there is even a better solution to these problems. Why not provide children with a religious education? Explain to children that many people have different ideas or perspectives about the origin of life, why we're here, the afterlife, and so on. And parents could take their children to a different place of worship (temples, mosques, churches, and so on) each month to learn about the perspectives held by the followers of diverse religions in the world. Parents also can teach children about the importance of asking for credible evidence that would support the beliefs and tenets of the religions. And after exploring the array of religious faiths, parents can encourage their children to decide for themselves, when they feel like it, which religion, if any, they want to embrace. And parents can tell their children that if they conclude that there is no merit to any of the religious faiths, the parents will respect their choice to be a non-believer. To a reasonable person, that is what religious education is.

However, that is not the type of religious education most people provide to their children. For most, educating their children about religion entails taking their children, weekly, monthly, or yearly to the parents' place of worship exclusively. The children are instructed repetitively about the veracity of the religion held by the parents. And if the children were to inquire about other religions, in all likelihood, they are told the other religions are less valid or are even falsehoods. So, it should be of no surprise that the vast majority of adults embrace the same religion as their parents (which, typically, is the same religion embraced by their particular culture or region in the world). It is not accurate to assert that most people choose their faith.

more at link

[E_Pluribus_Unitarian]

1. I would probably advise a different order...

Teach the critical thinking first, then expose them to the particular beliefs of the world's religions. The baseline of questioning and of "epistemological examination" of human claims of ultimate truth should be in place first, seems to me.

[cleanhippie]

2. BINGO! That's it exactly. Learning critical thought and skepticism first is paramount.

As well as creating an atmosphere where questioning authority is not only encouraged, it is celebrated. IMO, this is where the major religions lose, they do not allow the questioning of authority, or critical thought to be applied to the teachings.

I think this leads to an even bigger problem as well; the lack of critical thought is brought into adulthood, making people more susceptible to nonsense that comes from authority.

[pinto]

3. Good point that comparative religious education would help foster tolerance. I would include

agnosticism, atheism and "no opinion" in that scenario. Insularity breeds distrust and intolerance, imo.

[dimbear]

4. You could teach chilluns critical thinking. The only winner would be secularism.

I'm for it.