Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 03:03 PM Jan 2013

Black holes growing faster than expected

Stuart Gary
ABC

Existing theories on the relationship between the size of a galaxy and its central black hole are wrong according to a new Australian study.

The discovery by Dr Nicholas Scott and Professor Alister Graham, from Melbourne's Swinburne University of Technology, found smaller galaxies have far smaller black holes than previously estimated.

Central black holes, millions to billions of times larger than the Sun, reside in the core of most galaxies, and are thought to be integral to galactic formation and evolution.

However astronomers are still trying to understand this relationship.

more
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2013/01/17/3671551.htm

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Black holes growing faster than expected (Original Post) n2doc Jan 2013 OP
Thanks n2doc! This needs more investigation.. Permanut Jan 2013 #1
Uhm... Neoma Jan 2013 #2
"Close" is extremely relative. jeff47 Jan 2013 #3
Well, black holes are not vacuum cleaners. longship Jan 2013 #4
Good to know. Neoma Jan 2013 #5
I am a huge Bad Astronomy fan. longship Jan 2013 #6

Permanut

(5,608 posts)
1. Thanks n2doc! This needs more investigation..
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 03:21 PM
Jan 2013

I propose that we send five of our finest members of the House Science Committee out to one of these black holes to confirm the findings. I nominate the following:

Lamar Smith
Paul Broun
Jim Sensenbrenner
Dana Rohrabacher
Mo Brooks

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
3. "Close" is extremely relative.
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 04:23 PM
Jan 2013
This one is 24,000 light years away.

Which is "close" in cosmic terms. But still really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really, really far away.

longship

(40,416 posts)
4. Well, black holes are not vacuum cleaners.
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 04:58 PM
Jan 2013

They have the exact same gravity that a star of the same mass. If the sun were a black hole of the same mass the planets would orbit just the same as they do now.

There is nothing special about a black hole except it is much more compressed and it has an event horizon. Now, you don't want to go anywhere near that event horizon. But, it is close in. Things outside the event horizon only see the black hole's mass, as if it's a normal star.

I've simplified things quite a bit but that's the basic way it is.

So, I am not worried about black holes.

Neoma

(10,039 posts)
5. Good to know.
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 05:11 PM
Jan 2013

Just reminds me of Death from the Skies by Philip Plait PH.D. But I never got through the whole book yet.

longship

(40,416 posts)
6. I am a huge Bad Astronomy fan.
Thu Jan 17, 2013, 05:19 PM
Jan 2013

Phil Plait's Blog is great.
Bad Astronomy

He also has a TEDx talk here:


It's about asteroid collisions.

Just in case you didn't know.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Black holes growing faste...