Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumNearly all marine fish came from freshwater ancestors
Im sure that most of us think that marine fish evolved in the sea, but a new paper by Greta Vega and John Wiens in the Proceedings of the Royal Society (B) says that that just aint so. The vast majority of them evolved from ancestors who lived in fresh water (themselves derived from marine ancestors) and then re-invaded the seajust as marine mammals evolved from terrestrial mammals whose distant ancestors were aquatic.
As Vega and Wiens point out, compared to the land, the sea is biologically depauperate: marine habitat covers 70% of the Earths surface but contains only 15-25% of Earths species. It gets worse if you count habitable space: since the ocean is three-dimensional, Vega and Wiens claim that it contains 90-99% of the volume of the habitable biosphere.
...
My own guess, which is also that of Vega and Wiens, is that geographic barriers, which are the first step in most speciation events, are simply less common, or arise less frequently, in open water than in terrestrial habitats (riverine fish, of course, are geographically isolated in river systems). Its telling that the greatest diversity in the ocean is found in the Indo-Pacific, which Vega and Wiens describe as geographically complex, limiting dispersal and facilitating the formation of new species.
Vega and Wiens try to resolve this issue by doing a DNA-based phylogeny of the actinopterygians (the ray-finned fish, so called because of the bony struts in their fins). Ray-finned fish are by far the most numerous of all fishabout 96% of them. What they found was surprising: heres the phylogeny of different actinopterygian groups and the number of species in each group , with the colors indicating where they live (red is freshwater, blue marine, and mixed colors indicating that members of the group occupy both habitats. Notice that the three basal groups, Polypteriformes, Chondrostei, and Amiiformes, are all exclusively freshwater
...
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/nearly-all-marine-fish-came-from-freshwater-ancestors/
As Vega and Wiens point out, compared to the land, the sea is biologically depauperate: marine habitat covers 70% of the Earths surface but contains only 15-25% of Earths species. It gets worse if you count habitable space: since the ocean is three-dimensional, Vega and Wiens claim that it contains 90-99% of the volume of the habitable biosphere.
...
My own guess, which is also that of Vega and Wiens, is that geographic barriers, which are the first step in most speciation events, are simply less common, or arise less frequently, in open water than in terrestrial habitats (riverine fish, of course, are geographically isolated in river systems). Its telling that the greatest diversity in the ocean is found in the Indo-Pacific, which Vega and Wiens describe as geographically complex, limiting dispersal and facilitating the formation of new species.
Vega and Wiens try to resolve this issue by doing a DNA-based phylogeny of the actinopterygians (the ray-finned fish, so called because of the bony struts in their fins). Ray-finned fish are by far the most numerous of all fishabout 96% of them. What they found was surprising: heres the phylogeny of different actinopterygian groups and the number of species in each group , with the colors indicating where they live (red is freshwater, blue marine, and mixed colors indicating that members of the group occupy both habitats. Notice that the three basal groups, Polypteriformes, Chondrostei, and Amiiformes, are all exclusively freshwater
...
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2012/02/16/nearly-all-marine-fish-came-from-freshwater-ancestors/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1630 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nearly all marine fish came from freshwater ancestors (Original Post)
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2012
OP
xchrom
(108,903 posts)1. interesting. nt
hunter
(38,316 posts)2. Sharks and cephalopods, maybe?
And untold parasites...
The oceans were a pretty tough neighborhood.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)3. Lobe-finned fish, too.
Coelecanths were common in the oceans during the Mesozoic.