Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Europe's Extremely Large Telescope vs SydneyOpera House (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Jan 2015 OP
Damn, that thing is big. Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #1
Is this one going into the Atacama as well? n/t Jeff Murdoch Jan 2015 #2
Outside of Vegas Ichingcarpenter Jan 2015 #5
we're building mc'mansions in Murica olddots Jan 2015 #3
The US Webb space telescope will be awesome too Ichingcarpenter Jan 2015 #4
Yes! William Seger Jan 2015 #7
I can hardly wait for the RGT ... eppur_se_muova Jan 2015 #6
They cancelled the Overwhelmingly Large Telescope jakeXT Jan 2015 #8
Notice the human to scale on right bottom? Ichingcarpenter Jan 2015 #10
more humans jakeXT Jan 2015 #11
And they had to blow up the mountaintop jakeXT Jan 2015 #9
With telescopes, size matters. Thor_MN Jan 2015 #12
When I see yet another one of these I keep wondering why we are not building them in orbit Bearware Jan 2015 #13

William Seger

(10,778 posts)
7. Yes!
Sat Jan 24, 2015, 01:23 PM
Jan 2015

In terms of both scientific knowledge and awesome beauty, I believe Hubble has been the most productive and significant scientific instrument ever built, bar none, and Webb is a big next step. I can hardly wait! I'm really happy that we haven't gotten so, um, Republican that we stop funding "big science" projects.

Bearware

(151 posts)
13. When I see yet another one of these I keep wondering why we are not building them in orbit
Mon Jan 26, 2015, 01:12 AM
Jan 2015

Is it a mind set or is there some overwhelming physics reason we have not started building extremely large telescopes (from radio to x-ray) in orbit?

It takes a huge amount of money and effort to get a large telescope in orbit - a lot of which goes into just making it so it can survive the launch. Why are we not launching the raw materials and potentially semi-autonomous robots to build ultra-low mass telescopes in a micro gravity and high vacuum environment? If something in a design doesn't work, modify it in orbit or melt it down and turn it into a new design in orbit.


Having a telescope in an atmosphere forces all sorts of huge limitations on it's capabilities and availability.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Europe's Extremely Large ...