Science
Related: About this forumVideo: The solar system to scale
EarthSky
by Deborah Byrd in Blogs, Videos » Science Wire, Space
At first I thought I wouldnt watch this, because its 7 minutes long. But then I did watch it, and Im glad I did, because its a beautiful and touching depiction of the relationship between solid matter and empty space in our solar system. As the producers of the film Wylie Overstreet and Alex Gorosh point out, that relationship isnt well understood by most of us. Its impossible to capture in all the illustrations weve seen of our planets and sun because the planets are just so minuscule in contrast to the vast space of our own solar system, our local neighborhood of space. Any illustrations youve seen on paper or your computer screen just havent captured the matter-to-space relationship as it truly is.
Thats why these producers went to a dry lakebed in Nevada to make their film.
More
http://earthsky.org/space/video-the-solar-system-to-scale?utm_source=EarthSky+News&utm_campaign=4415294f04-EarthSky_News&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_c643945d79-4415294f04-393525109
Skinner
(63,645 posts)Thanks for posting.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
There are people who think that all of the planets orbit the sun on a single plane.
Instead, it's more like the electrons orbiting a nucleus of an atom.
If our solar system were an atom, we'd violate the octet rule, having an odd set of electrons.
.
longship
(40,416 posts)So, to a good approximation they orbit in a single plane, and nothing like electrons in an atom.
Just ask any astronomer.
My best to you.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... and if I'm not mistaken, the fact that Pluto's orbit does not conform to the ecliptic is one of the reasons it got demoted to "Sorta Planet-like Thingamajig," to employ the technical jargon.
longship
(40,416 posts)The barycenter of Pluto/Charon is outside of Pluto.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... I'll take your word for it.
Forgive me, I'm in a playful mood today after a go-round with some folks in another thread that have serious anger management issues.
Please elaborate on "Barycenter" and Pluto's orbit; I am genuinely interested in learning something I didn't know.
longship
(40,416 posts)I am just a old scope hack. And playful is fine.
Barycenter is the center of mass between two objects. It is the point around which the objects orbit. If it lies outside both objects, it means that neither object is really primary. Charon is so large compared to Pluto, and so close, that the center of mass is between the two instead of within Pluto. The two objects dance around each other rather than one really orbiting around the other. E.G., For the Earth/Moon, the barycenter is within the Earth. The barycenter of the Sun/Earth is within the Sun.
Also, Pluto's orbit is highly elliptical and at a considerable angle to the ecliptic, the approximate plane of the other planets' orbits. It also dips within the orbit of Neptune for part of its orbit.
I hope this helps.
My best to you. (Love your toons, BTW)
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)And I love learning something new, even at my advanced age. Thanks for taking the time to explain it.
My best to you as well!
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Electrons "orbit" in orbitals, not orbits.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 18, 2015, 03:27 PM - Edit history (1)
Planets obit more or less in the same plane, within a few degrees, with the exception of Pluto, which you know is no longer considered a planet.
Why? Angular momentum.
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/our-solar-system/57-our-solar-system/planets-and-dwarf-planets/orbits/242-why-do-all-the-planets-orbit-in-the-same-plane-intermediate
Just as the Milky Way does...
And the Universe? Yep...
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/174427-astrophysicists-create-the-first-accurate-map-of-the-universe-its-very-flat-and-probably-infinite
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)I loves all dat scientifical shit! No, seriously, the staggering dimensions of space are awesome to contemplate.
Well done!
idahoblue
(377 posts)It was over half of my daily commute. I hope they do it again as it is gone after replacing.
Vincardog
(20,234 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)But we scaled down to fit in a football field.
(My Dad taught the class)
IHateTheGOP
(1,059 posts)The universe is , almost entirely, black emptyness, and yet the number of suns is staggering.
gvstn
(2,805 posts)It wasn't perfect about showing how big space is,
I remember a movie where one of the astronauts doing some repair on their spaceship, lost their tether and started floating out into Space. That is when you realize how big and cold space really is. It is both terrifying and mind-boggling.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Thank you...
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)K/R
I remember having a conversation with my dad when I was child. Altho0ugh he was only a high school graduate, he was very well read on science. I asked him about how small one would have to make the Sun to make a scale model of the solar system that would fit inside a building. He kept answering me with distances that were unimaginably long the smaller I made the Sun. By the time I asked where Pluto would be if the Sun were the size of an atom in the living room, he told me Pluto would be about the end of the block.
I though about that discussion as I watched this.
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)Pack the combatants on a ship and show them our blue marble, from near lunar orbit.
This is the reason science scares fundamentalists, We actually are that insignificant.
Would we hear the complaints of a single bacteria on one grain of sand in the Sahara?
fasttense
(17,301 posts)That's a good way of putting it.
It takes a bucket load of arrogance to think you are a concern of the universe.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)That's a good word.