Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jim__

(14,075 posts)
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:05 PM Mar 2016

The moon thought to play a major role in maintaining Earth's magnetic field

From phys.org:

[center][/center]
[center]The gravitational effects associated with the presence of the Moon and Sun cause cyclical deformation of the Earth's mantle and wobbles in its rotation axis. This mechanical forcing applied to the whole planet causes strong currents in the outer core, which is made up of a liquid iron alloy of very low viscosity. Such currents are enough to generate the Earth's magnetic field. Credit: Julien Monteux and Denis Andrault.[/center]
[hr]
The Earth's magnetic field permanently protects us from the charged particles and radiation that originate in the sun. This shield is produced by the geodynamo, the rapid motion of huge quantities of liquid iron alloy in the Earth's outer core. To maintain this magnetic field until the present day, the classical model required the Earth's core to have cooled by around 3,000° C over the past 4.3 billion years. Now, a team of researchers from CNRS and Université Blaise Pascal1 suggests that, on the contrary, its temperature has fallen by only 300° C. The action of the moon, overlooked until now, is thought to have compensated for this difference and kept the geodynamo active. Their work is published on 30 march 2016 in the journal Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

The classical model of the formation of Earth's magnetic field raised a major paradox. For the geodynamo to work, the Earth would have had to be totally molten four billion years ago, and its core would have had to slowly cool from around 6800° C at that time to 3800° C today. However, recent modeling of the early evolution of the internal temperature of the planet, together with geochemical studies of the composition of the oldest carbonatites and basalts, do not support such cooling. With such high temperatures being ruled out, the researchers propose another source of energy in their study.

The Earth has a slightly flattened shape and rotates about an inclined axis that wobbles around the poles. Its mantle deforms elastically due to tidal effects caused by the moon. The researchers show that this effect could continuously stimulate the motion of the liquid iron alloy making up the outer core, and in return generate Earth's magnetic field. The Earth continuously receives 3700 billion watts of power through the transfer of the gravitational and rotational energy of the Earth-moon-sun system, and over 1,000 billion watts is thought to be available to bring about this type of motion in the outer core. This energy is enough to generate the Earth's magnetic field, which together with the moon, resolves the major paradox in the classical theory. The effect of gravitational forces on a planet's magnetic field has already been well documented for two of Jupiter's moons, Io and Europa, and for a number of exoplanets.

more ...
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The moon thought to play a major role in maintaining Earth's magnetic field (Original Post) Jim__ Mar 2016 OP
Which, among a few other things, would explain why we have not found any evidence of intelligence -none Mar 2016 #1
No, there are probably other intelligent species in the universe but considering cstanleytech Apr 2016 #2

-none

(1,884 posts)
1. Which, among a few other things, would explain why we have not found any evidence of intelligence
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 03:28 PM
Mar 2016

life out there.
We may be more unique than we realize.

cstanleytech

(26,286 posts)
2. No, there are probably other intelligent species in the universe but considering
Fri Apr 1, 2016, 10:20 AM
Apr 2016

the size of it we probably just arent close to any of them currently.
Sure there might have been some nearby at one time but most species only last for a finite number of years and then they go extinct so given the age of the galaxy let alone the universe itself the odds of us finding any nearby currently advanced species are just pretty low.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The moon thought to play ...