Science
Related: About this forumWhy did Greenlands Vikings disappear?
Archaeologists still wonder today. No chapter of Arctic history is more mysterious than the disappearance of these Norse settlements sometime in the 15th century. Theories for the colony's failure have included everything from sinister Basque pirates to the Black Plague. But historians have usually pinned most responsibility on the Norse themselves, arguing that they failed to adapt to a changing climate. The Norse settled Greenland from Iceland during a warm period around 1000 C.E. But even as a chilly era called the Little Ice Age set in, the story goes, they clung to raising livestock and church-building while squandering natural resources like soil and timber. Meanwhile, the seal-hunting, whale-eating Inuit survived in the very same environment.
Over the last decade, however, new excavations across the North Atlantic have forced archaeologists to revise some of these long-held views. An international research collective called the North Atlantic Biocultural Organisation (NABO) has accumulated precise new data on ancient settlement patterns, diet, and landscape. The findings suggest that the Greenland Norse focused less on livestock and more on trade, especially in walrus ivory, and that for food they relied more on the sea than on their pastures. There's no doubt that climate stressed the colony, but the emerging narrative is not of an agricultural society short on food, but a hunting society short on labor and susceptible to catastrophes at sea and social unrest.
Historian Poul Holm of Trinity College in Dublin lauds the new picture, which reveals that the Greenland Norse were "not a civilization stuck in their ways." To NABO archaeologist George Hambrecht of the University of Maryland in College Park, "The new story is that they adapted but they failed anyway."
--- Snip (much more follows) ---
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/11/why-did-greenland-s-vikings-disappear
dhol82
(9,420 posts)Bet there are a bunch of Norse genes in the mix.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,283 posts)when those genes came in.
hedda_foil
(16,479 posts)The rest were absorbed into the local population.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,283 posts)Yes, they might have left, and died at sea, but there's no sign of it. It would be unlikely if that was the principle reason for the disappearance of the colony, but that those left behind never wrote down anything about a sudden increase of deaths at sea. There's no record of the settlers appearing anywhere else.
And the Norse were the local population. The previous American-Indian culture to inhabit Greenland, the 'Dorset' culture, had disappeared several centuries before the Norse arrived to find it uninhabited. The 'Thule' culture, ancestral to today's inhabitants, arrived after that, but inhabited areas further to the north, at that time.
dhol82
(9,420 posts)Not sure but can't they do an analysis of DNA or Mitochondrial DNA to eliminate the recent input to their genome?