Science
Related: About this forumTime Can Actually Flow Backward, Physicists Say
Stav Dimitropoulos - 12h ago
Isaac Newtons picture of a universally ticking clock more or less sums up how we understand time: the arrow of time only moves forward, cruelly robbing us of the chance to revisit our past.
Not everyone takes that for granted though, as evidenced by Albert Einstein, whose 1905 theory of special relativity stated that time is an illusion that moves relative to an observer. Today, physicists like Julian Barbour, who has written a book on the illusion of time, say change is real, but time is not; time is only a reflection of change. And just last week, a team of physicists published a new paper suggesting that quantum systems can move both forward and backward in time.
To understand why scientists previously established that time knows only one directionforwardwe need to examine the second law of thermodynamics. It states that within a closed system, the entropy of the system (that is, the measure of disorder and randomness within the system) remains constant or increases. If our universe is a closed loop, curled up like a ball, its entropy can never decrease, meaning the universe will never return to an earlier point. But what if the arrow of time looked at phenomena where entropy changes are small?
Take the case of a gas in a vessel, says Giulia Rubino, a postdoctoral research fellow at the University of Bristol, and lead author of the new paper that appears in Communications Physics. Lets suppose that at the beginning, the gas occupies only half of the vessel. Then imagine that we remove the valve that confined it within half of the vessel, so that the gas is now free to expand throughout the vessel.
More:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/time-can-actually-flow-backward-physicists-say/ar-AAWuywv?li=BBnbfcL
Lisa0825
(14,487 posts)brush
(53,778 posts)going back.
bahboo
(16,337 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,528 posts)Caroline Delbert - 7h ago
Scientists believe there could be an anti-universe somewhere out there that looks like the mirror image of our own universe, reciprocating almost everything we do. If this theory holds true, it could explain the presence of dark matter.
First, some background: the Big Bang is a collective term that includes a variety of theories studied by cosmologists, the scientists who try to rewind the clock as close to the very beginning of the universe as possible. Most agree that matter exploded forth, but there are different opinions on, for example, whether the temperature was extremely hot or absolute-zero cold at that initial moment.
There are also disagreements about what may have happened prior to the bang itself. Could it be that what we call the Big Bang was the inflection point of an even bigger bounce in progress? Think of the point when you bounce on the trampoline and your feet almost touch the ground beneaththen imagine only seeing the subsequent bounce upward; its meaningless without the first, downward half of the bounce!
Dark matter is, if such a thing exists, maybe even more perplexing to scientists than the Big Bang. Thats because dark matter is a key piece that helps to complete an unclear puzzle the question of what forms the universe around us today, not billions of years ago. Dark matter forms the bulk of the matter in the universe, but weve never been able to see it anywhere.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/scientists-say-there-s-an-anti-universe-running-backward-in-time/ar-AAWudyz
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)I think we've known that for awhile...at our macro level, not so much, or at least no evidence for it yet.
Jerry2144
(2,101 posts)On a Friday afternoon. Time feels like it stops or goes backwards
Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)StarryNite
(9,444 posts)For instance, what is consciousness?
LudwigPastorius
(9,140 posts)These guys propose that there are microscopic structures in our cells that function as quantum computers, and that consciousness arises from them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction
Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
Duppers This message was self-deleted by its author.
LudwigPastorius
(9,140 posts)and positing that time is flowing both forward and backward at the quantum level, why not just say that the flow of time doesn't exist until it is observed (or measured)?