Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,623 posts)
Sat Aug 13, 2016, 05:13 AM Aug 2016

New insights on Great Lakes Late Precontact period monuments

New insights on Great Lakes Late Precontact period monuments

Posted on August 10, 2016




Mounds and circular earthwork enclosures in Michigan (entire geospatial database created through archival research with early state archaeological records). Image: University of New Hampshire



Merging an innovative modelling technique with old-fashioned sleuthing, researchers from the University of New Hampshire have shed new light on the mystery of pre-contact archaeological monument sites in Michigan, even though 80 percent no longer exist.

The study, published recently in the journal PNAS (open access), provides an important new geospatial approach for archaeologists and other cultural heritage professionals who have grappled with the fact that many significant ancient monuments have been lost forever to modern development.

Case study

Meghan Howey, associate professor of anthropology, and Michael Palace, associate professor of Earth and geospatial science, both of UNH, along with Crystal McMichael of the University of Amsterdam, set out to better understand the roles of two different kinds of earthen monuments in Michigan that have been subject to high rates of modern destruction. Their focus was on burial mounds and circular earthwork mounds and enclosures dating to the Late Precontact period of 1,000 – 1,600 A.D. Earthen mounds and enclosures are common across the eastern U.S. and they have long been subject to misguided and popular speculation. Because of this, it is important to study these monumental constructions systematically to understand their social significance in the lives of the past indigenous communities who built them.

“Our goal was to build a case study to help identify which spatial and environmental variables were important to the placement of these earthen monuments across Michigan’s landscape,” said Howey, who is the James H. Hayes and Claire Short Hayes Professor of the Humanities. “Understanding how monuments reconfigure landscapes and affect societal development is a grand challenge in archaeology.”

More:
http://www.pasthorizonspr.com/index.php/archives/08/2016/new-insights-on-great-lakes-late-precontact-period-monuments

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Anthropology»New insights on Great Lak...