Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 01:42 PM Nov 2012

Just so you know who we're dealing with...

"As a result of my recent ministry on the Democratic Underground website (DU), I
was able to develop a simple critical thinking exercise to help atheists "come
out" regarding what they explicitly and/or implicitly believe or don't believe.

It appears to have been quite effective with the DU atheists, so I am presenting
it here for those who may wish to work through the exercise, step by reasonable
step."

(Emphasis mine)

...and then he goes on to copy that whole stupid Major/Minor premise nonsense.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maury_and_Baty/message/29450

"DISCLAIMER!: The Maury_and_Baty list is not connected with any church. Its founder, Robert Baty, is a member of the church of Christ."

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maury_and_Baty/

Just couldn't resist finding out a little more about the interloper in our midst.

I'm sure he won't mind. He's SO proud of everything he says! (He must be because he says it over and over and over and ... ... ... )
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just so you know who we're dealing with... (Original Post) FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 OP
He owes me a bullshit detector. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #1
yeah, he pinned mine, too Warpy Nov 2012 #12
With which atheist was that sophomoric sophistry even close to "effective"? dmallind Nov 2012 #2
Exactly. FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 #3
Does he post here in AA? JNelson6563 Nov 2012 #4
LOL! It's RLBaty! RLBaty Nov 2012 #5
Yes, we see you. nt rrneck Nov 2012 #6
Yes, I'm watching you watching me! RLBaty Nov 2012 #7
Self promotion. rrneck Nov 2012 #11
So who is it JNelson6563 Nov 2012 #10
Julie, Julie, Julie! RLBaty Nov 2012 #13
Could you first demonstrate this "effective" approach? dmallind Nov 2012 #15
Been there, done that! It's your turn... RLBaty Nov 2012 #16
Where? Prove it. Link to a thread that demonstrated this "effective" approach dmallind Nov 2012 #26
See posts 5 & 7 FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 #8
Regarding posts #5 & #7 of this thread! RLBaty Nov 2012 #9
"no DU students have enrolled!" FiveGoodMen Nov 2012 #14
I suggest you take your delusions, go away and come back when you've grown up. mr blur Nov 2012 #23
No "DU students" have enrolled because your "exercise" is a giant POS. cleanhippie Nov 2012 #29
Wow, we all fell into his expertly constructed trap! trotsky Nov 2012 #17
No trap; just a little open, honest conversation from this side of the monitor! RLBaty Nov 2012 #18
Your "exercise" is the equivalent of sitting on the couch watching TV. trotsky Nov 2012 #19
Trotsky, be the first to show your friends here how easy it is! RLBaty Nov 2012 #20
Ok, you're done spamming. JNelson6563 Nov 2012 #21
Just passing through, saw the post about RLbaty banned elsewhere...he seems to be a died-in-the-wool Katashi_itto Nov 2012 #22
The pathology of these types of people EvolveOrConvolve Nov 2012 #24
It appears to have been effective? Curmudgeoness Nov 2012 #25
A WILD RLBATY APPEARS! OriginalGeek Nov 2012 #28
Stop yelling at me!!! Curmudgeoness Nov 2012 #34
lol, Pokemans might have been a little after your time OriginalGeek Nov 2012 #36
Your assumption is correct. Curmudgeoness Nov 2012 #37
Anyone understand what he's trying to get at? Bradical79 Nov 2012 #27
It seems to be a bizarre attempt to 'prove' what atheists 'believe' muriel_volestrangler Nov 2012 #30
Ohhhhh. Why didn't he just say that Curmudgeoness Nov 2012 #35
Anyone understand what he's trying to get at? AlbertCat Nov 2012 #40
He's baaaaack uriel1972 Nov 2012 #31
Oh my stars and fucking garters! deucemagnet Nov 2012 #33
I suggested a while back that this person be banned from this group. Warren Stupidity Nov 2012 #32
Elvis has left the building n/t kdmorris Nov 2012 #38
And he left kicking and screaming... EvolveOrConvolve Nov 2012 #39
ROFL... apt assessment :) n/t kdmorris Nov 2012 #41
And I was so excited for the opportunity to educate the poor wayward child! trotsky Nov 2012 #42

Warpy

(111,266 posts)
12. yeah, he pinned mine, too
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 05:45 PM
Nov 2012

with springs coming out and a little wisp of smoke curling up.

It is incredible, the arrogance of such people.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
2. With which atheist was that sophomoric sophistry even close to "effective"?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 02:00 PM
Nov 2012

I have more erm.... faith.... in you lot than that.

JNelson6563

(28,151 posts)
10. So who is it
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 05:23 PM
Nov 2012

that you have convinced with your sparkling intellect? Your clever method of making atheists see the light?

Just curious who you've had this success with.

Please answer quickly since, now that your purpose is known, you may or may not be posting in AA much longer.

Julie

 

RLBaty

(335 posts)
13. Julie, Julie, Julie!
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 05:49 PM
Nov 2012

The light is on for you at my place, and will remain so.

I look forward to your successful completion of the Atheist 101 exercise:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maury_and_Baty/message/29450

Others are welcome as well; there's plenty of classroom space and open, honest participants can't help but score a passing grade.

Others, not so much!

Sincerely,
Robert Baty

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
15. Could you first demonstrate this "effective" approach?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 06:25 PM
Nov 2012

You claimed you had one and that it worked here. Show us an example.

 

RLBaty

(335 posts)
16. Been there, done that! It's your turn...
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 06:41 PM
Nov 2012

...to openly, honestly deal with those six, simple, fundamental steps in the critical thinking exercise with emphasis on atheism.

See you (and others) in class, or not:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maury_and_Baty/message/29450

I will be glad to discuss your grade(s) and any disagreement you may have regarding the effectiveness of the exercise upon your completion of the exercise.

Sincerely,
Robert Baty

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
26. Where? Prove it. Link to a thread that demonstrated this "effective" approach
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 10:43 PM
Nov 2012

You claimed that it was effective with *DU* atheists.

The day I need to learn from the likes of you is the day I kill myself.

 

mr blur

(7,753 posts)
23. I suggest you take your delusions, go away and come back when you've grown up.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:22 PM
Nov 2012

You have nothing to teach anyone here. 40 years ago I started a Philosophy degree - we'd have left you behind in the first week.

Try Freeperland, they'd welcome you over there and the standard of discourse is pitched at just about your level.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
29. No "DU students" have enrolled because your "exercise" is a giant POS.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 01:00 PM
Nov 2012

You do realize that people are laughing AT you, right?

 

RLBaty

(335 posts)
18. No trap; just a little open, honest conversation from this side of the monitor!
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 06:47 PM
Nov 2012

Too bad y'all have been unable to put up even one to requite my love and interests, but the light remains on for y'all should one or more of you decide to come out and work towards a successful completion of my simple, fundamental critical thinking exercise involving atheism.

See you there, or not:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maury_and_Baty/message/29450

Sincerely,
Robert Baty

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
19. Your "exercise" is the equivalent of sitting on the couch watching TV.
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 06:55 PM
Nov 2012

But good luck with your self-aggrandizement!

 

RLBaty

(335 posts)
20. Trotsky, be the first to show your friends here how easy it is!
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 07:01 PM
Nov 2012

The light is on, the classroom awaits:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Maury_and_Baty/message/29450

Come out, come out, Trotsky!

Or not!

I'll understand; really, I'll understand!

Sincerely,
Robert Baty
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
22. Just passing through, saw the post about RLbaty banned elsewhere...he seems to be a died-in-the-wool
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:02 PM
Nov 2012

Narcissist.

Just my personal observation.

Kudos for banning him. Although I'd make it permanent, that type never changes.

EvolveOrConvolve

(6,452 posts)
24. The pathology of these types of people
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 08:54 PM
Nov 2012

is very similar to the pathology of rapists. It's not about facts or understanding or honesty - it's about control and power.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
25. It appears to have been effective?
Thu Nov 8, 2012, 09:26 PM
Nov 2012

The other day, I did spend some time with that bullshit, and all I could come up with is "what the fuck is this guy talking about?"

To me, this is simple. There is no god. His dissertation was anything but simple. But maybe I am just not smart enough to keep up with that brainiac.

Effective would seem to me to mean that he had converted the atheists here at DU. Well, he may have confused this atheist, but he did not make me question my beliefs/non-beliefs.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
27. Anyone understand what he's trying to get at?
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 01:56 AM
Nov 2012

IF (A) man was able to originate the
> idea/concept of God through the power
> of imagination, as opposed to reason
> and/or revelation,
>
> THEN (B) man did originate the
> idea/concept of God through the power
> of imagination.

Not sure what part A means. Imagination as I understand it is not necessarily in opposition of reason, which I feel makes it a bad or poorly stated premise.

As for part B, just because someone is able to have done something doesn't mean he did it. So I guess the answer to step #1 would be no, though the poor premise makes the whole thing pretty meaningless (garbage in, garbage out as they say in the computer science world).

The only difference between the major and minor premise is that the minor premise is stated as fact rather than question, but the same issue apply to the minor premise as the major one.

Honestly, didn't read the other steps after that. If the first step is a failure, there's no reason to go onto the rest.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,319 posts)
30. It seems to be a bizarre attempt to 'prove' what atheists 'believe'
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 06:31 PM
Nov 2012

It goes something like this:

"here is a suggestion:
If humans could have made up God, then humans did make up God.
I claim atheists think humans could have made up God.
I claim atheists think humans did make up God.
Therefore I claim that atheists think that 'if humans could have made up God, then humans did make up God.'"

The last step, whatever atheists think, is nonsense. You cannot work back from that kind of conclusion of an argument to prove a premise of it. It is the equivalent of:

"here is a suggestion:
if a positive number is greater than 1, then that positive number is even.
4 is greater than 1.
4 is even.
Therefore if a positive number is greater than 1, then that positive number is even."

I suspect he would then attempt to say that atheists think they have proved that all ideas of gods were made up by humans, but that atheists are mistaken in their logic, therefore - God.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
35. Ohhhhh. Why didn't he just say that
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 08:08 PM
Nov 2012

instead of that dissertation that we all quit reading after (at least) the minor premise.

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)
31. He's baaaaack
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:04 PM
Nov 2012

This time in religion, where it belongs I guess.
His debate technique seems to be LALALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU you obviously agree with me and if you say you don't you are wrong.
I let him get under my skin, but my anger is slowly dissapating.

deucemagnet

(4,549 posts)
33. Oh my stars and fucking garters!
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:48 PM
Nov 2012

Classic! Thread has the potential to go down in history with the "Passion of the Christ" thread as one of the funniest ever. Trotsky nearly had me in tears!

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
32. I suggested a while back that this person be banned from this group.
Fri Nov 9, 2012, 07:22 PM
Nov 2012

My suggestion was rejected. It was and is obvious to me that he is a) spamming the board to promote his crap, and b) a dishonest actor.

Ah never mind, he is banned. Good riddance creep-troll.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
42. And I was so excited for the opportunity to educate the poor wayward child!
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 05:47 PM
Nov 2012

And his innocent, simplistic thoughts. Ah, the knowledge he could have gained at my knee! But 'twas not to be!

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Just so you know who we'r...