Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WillParkinson

(16,862 posts)
Mon Jun 4, 2012, 02:40 PM Jun 2012

Michigan Court Rules Against Atheism Sign

Michigan Court Rules Against Atheism Sign

A court has ruled that the Freedom From Religion Foundation had no right to place their sign amongst religious Christmas displays in the Warren, Michigan town hall. The sign was refused by the mayor, prompting the lawsuit. From the ruling:

[T]he Mayor sets forth permissible bases for denial — that the Sign was meant to counter the Nativity Scene, not celebrate the holiday season, and that the anti-religious language of the sign, in this context, could lead to a disruption of city business. There is nothing indicating the Mayor denied placement of the Sign solely in defense of religion; religion was simply not the appropriate subject-matter.

The sign reads: "At this season of the Winter Solstice, let reason prevail. There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds."

http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2012/06/michigan-court-rules-against-atheism.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michigan Court Rules Against Atheism Sign (Original Post) WillParkinson Jun 2012 OP
"..religion was simply not the appropriate subject-matter." Then sinkingfeeling Jun 2012 #1
"the anti-religious language of the sign ... could lead to a disruption of city business" trotsky Jun 2012 #2
Having literally grown up in the federal judiciary Rittermeister Jun 2012 #3

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
2. "the anti-religious language of the sign ... could lead to a disruption of city business"
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 11:27 AM
Jun 2012

Where have I heard that one before?

Hello, blasphemy laws. How DARE you say something that offends my religious sensibilities!

Rittermeister

(170 posts)
3. Having literally grown up in the federal judiciary
Tue Jun 5, 2012, 12:36 PM
Jun 2012

I have seen some amazingly scary stuff. Half these assholes make no pretense to enforce the constitution; personal bias will do nicely. The place is overrun with conservative Roman Catholics, who see Thomas More as an inspirational figure. Yay, let's place loyalty to the pope over loyalty to the American people.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Atheists & Agnostics»Michigan Court Rules Agai...