Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I may have eaten some GMO food today (Original Post) Orrex Mar 2015 OP
You're already dead Renew Deal Mar 2015 #1
And it is indistinguishable from regular normal life. arcane1 Mar 2015 #2
Most think they're in hell Renew Deal Mar 2015 #3
Don't tell them! arcane1 Mar 2015 #8
What the heck is that "epigenetic" and "gene expression" stuff, anyway? Archae Mar 2015 #4
Loser. Orrex Mar 2015 #5
Say what? Archae Mar 2015 #6
Check your PM Orrex Mar 2015 #7
Yeah, along with "quantum" and "Big Pharma." Archae Mar 2015 #9
PS: HuckleB Mar 2015 #10
Love it! Orrex Mar 2015 #12
Both are legitimate scientific terms. drm604 Mar 2015 #13
What else is new? Archae Mar 2015 #14
Based on your quantum malfeasance Beearewhyain Mar 2015 #11
Eventually, you will turn into a GMO/Human hybrid. Liberal Veteran Mar 2015 #15
I blame Jane Goodall. Orrex Mar 2015 #16
She has lost all credibility. Archae Mar 2015 #17
She studies primates not GMO's right? LostOne4Ever Mar 2015 #18
There are sometimes a scientist can actually know what he or she is talking about... Archae Mar 2015 #19
Funny that they ridicule Nye and DeGrasse-Tyson for daring to speak outside of their fields Orrex Mar 2015 #20
Just seems like the only time scientists talk outside their field LostOne4Ever Mar 2015 #21
Could you post a gluten-free version of this thread? Dr. Strange Mar 2015 #22
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
2. And it is indistinguishable from regular normal life.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 12:42 AM
Mar 2015

Whether that is Heaven or Hell depends on the individual DUer

Archae

(46,327 posts)
4. What the heck is that "epigenetic" and "gene expression" stuff, anyway?
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 12:46 AM
Mar 2015

I never heard of it before.

(Why is it I feel like it's going to be woo, like "quantum healing?&quot

Beearewhyain

(600 posts)
11. Based on your quantum malfeasance
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:02 AM
Mar 2015

It is clear that you have failed to maximize homeostasis while simultaneously decentralizing neuro pathways which, obviously, leads to heightened macro-aggressive negative symbiosis. In other words your humours are out of balance; find leeches stat!


(Stat is a medical term so you know you can trust my medical advice)

LostOne4Ever

(9,288 posts)
18. She studies primates not GMO's right?
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 04:22 AM
Mar 2015

And her PhD (she never earned a BS or masters...) is in animal behavior not gmo's?

I can't believe people would latch onto her as if she actually knew what she was talking about. Its like taking a famous baker's opinion on the best way to build a nuclear plant.



I guess when a group is desperate they will cling to anything or anyone to hide the fact that 85+% of scientists who actually study the issue think they are nuts.

Archae

(46,327 posts)
19. There are sometimes a scientist can actually know what he or she is talking about...
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 01:09 PM
Mar 2015

...outside their specialty.

Neil DeGrasse-Tyson is an astrophysicist, (I think he is,) and Bill Nye is an engineer.
And they are capable of relating a great deal of factual information on different sciences.

But when Linus Pauling, a nuclear physicist, tried his hand on nutrition, it was a disaster.

Likewise here with Jane Goodall, who studied chimpanzees, trying to sound like an authority on GMO's.

Orrex

(63,210 posts)
20. Funny that they ridicule Nye and DeGrasse-Tyson for daring to speak outside of their fields
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 01:28 PM
Mar 2015

But Goodall and Suzuki are sacrosanct because they believe that GMOs are teh evil.

LostOne4Ever

(9,288 posts)
21. Just seems like the only time scientists talk outside their field
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 05:51 PM
Mar 2015

And don't embarrass themselves is when they are agreeing with consensus.

The rest just seem to make jokes out of themselves like dr Hubble did when he tried to claim archaeopteryx was fake.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Skepticism, Science & Pseudoscience»I may have eaten some GMO...